The AK47 was cheaper, and if Russia didn't want to sell it to you, China had knockoffs. Besides, there are more cool videos of the AK47 in action rather than the SAR 80/88 or even the SAR-21...
My opinion though, is that money can be spent better on other things other than yet another rifle, for example powered armor.
<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/DqQloLvpWFA?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/DqQloLvpWFA?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="390"></embed></object>
My opinion though, is that money can be spent better on other things other than yet another rifle, for example powered armor.
<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/DqQloLvpWFA?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/DqQloLvpWFA?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="390"></embed></object>
The SAR80 was my issued weapon for the last year of my NS. It was not that bad but it did have the following negatives:
- It is heavier than the M16
- Although it had fewer parts for field stripping than the M16, I understand from my QM friend that it was more complicated than the M16 for armoury maintenance
- Its bang was loud
- It did not have a carrying handle and and at that time, we were not issued with the combat slings that we have now - this made it very awkward to carry in a non-tact situation
- Its aethetics was zero, and did not make up for it with a distinct profile like the M16, AK47, FAMAS, Steyr AUG or even Galil
- Most importantly, we didn't know why we had to change from the M16 - other than marginally greater accuracy, there was no improvement and it was not considerably cheaper either.
On the plus side, I didn't get the impression that its IA rate was any worse than the M16. When held in the shooting position, it was very comfortable. And the recoil was low, courtesy of two guide springs and rods placed in the line of the barrel.
In these ways at least, I'm not sure it was worse than the AK47. Incidentally, the bolt assembly was fashioned after the AK47 to take advantage of its reliability and economy.