• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Plane crash in China

Must be PLA missile test gone wrong and hit wrong target lah.
 
All Chinese airlines should revert to using their own COMAC Cxxx domestic made aircrafts instead. Why are they trusting Boeing and Airbus?
 
All Chinese airlines should revert to using their own COMAC Cxxx domestic made aircrafts instead. Why are they trusting Boeing and Airbus?
Then we'll get to see more plane crashes in tiong-cock, dumbass. :laugh:
 
Tiagong from the almost vertical nosedive at 9,000m/min, it is very likely to be an act of a human intervention, possibly by a suicidal pilot, just like the SilkAir flight which went down in Palembang.

 
Last edited:
All Chinese airlines should revert to using their own COMAC Cxxx domestic made aircrafts instead. Why are they trusting Boeing and Airbus?

Perhaps they are not confident of their own technology. :cautious:
 
All Chinese airlines should revert to using their own COMAC Cxxx domestic made aircrafts instead. Why are they trusting Boeing and Airbus?
may be deliberately sabotaged by comac spies working in eastern airlines.
 
Perhaps they are not confident of their own technology. :cautious:
Because they can only fly domestic routes as they cannot get International Certification for flying to other countries.
 
may be deliberately sabotaged by comac spies working in eastern airlines.
The black box should reveal more. Anyway, witnesses on the ground reported that it managed to ascend for a short while before nosediving vertically again to its eventual crash. Even if due to engine failures, the plane should likely crash in a normal descend manner. I suspect one of the pilot (or co-pilot) could be trying to overcome the first pilot from the suicidal attempt but eventually failed and that explains why there was the short period of ascend.

The other possibility to cause such a nosedive crash is due to the malfunction of the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), similar to the 737 Max, but this older model doesn't have this feature.
 
The black box should reveal more. Anyway, witnesses on the ground reported that it managed to ascend for a short while before nosediving vertically again to its eventual crash. Even if due to engine failures, the plane should likely crash in a normal descend manner. I suspect one of the pilot (or co-pilot) could be trying to overcome the first pilot from the suicidal attempt but eventually failed and that explains why there was the short period of ascend.

The other possibility to cause such a nosedive crash is due to the malfunction of the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), similar to the 737 Max, but this older model doesn't have this feature.
too much of a coincidence when boeing is about to get the 737 max approved for flights in prc.
 
The black box should reveal more. Anyway, witnesses on the ground reported that it managed to ascend for a short while before nosediving vertically again to its eventual crash. Even if due to engine failures, the plane should likely crash in a normal descend manner. I suspect one of the pilot (or co-pilot) could be trying to overcome the first pilot from the suicidal attempt but eventually failed and that explains why there was the short period of ascend.

The other possibility to cause such a nosedive crash is due to the malfunction of the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), similar to the 737 Max, but this older model doesn't have this feature.
This 737 is not fly by wire, so to dive like that means some sort of catastrophic failure due to poor maintenance. Or yes, pilot suicide ala silkair 185.
 
This 737 is not fly by wire, so to dive like that means some sort of catastrophic failure due to poor maintenance. Or yes, pilot suicide ala silkair 185.
Definitely a sabotage by Boeing. There is a chip hidden in all Boeing planes. CIA has worked with Boeing for decades. This is like the nuclear deployment red button. One simple instruction from Boeing can cause a total failure of navigation systems in any Boeing plane. I admit in this instance US 1: China 0
 
Passengers had heated arguments forced their way into the captain cockpit. That is what people has been discussing since the accident in Weibo
 
Definitely a sabotage by Boeing. There is a chip hidden in all Boeing planes. CIA has worked with Boeing for decades. This is like the nuclear deployment red button. One simple instruction from Boeing can cause a total failure of navigation systems in any Boeing plane. I admit in this instance US 1: China 0
bro, you have been consuming too much online conspiracy garbage liao!:biggrin:

But you could be right. I have lived long enough to know that nothing is what it seems. Believe no one, trust no one, take no prisoners.:cautious::biggrin:
 
Back
Top