• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PeeRs Have 2 Years Advantage Over Sporns!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR>No CPF advantage for PRs over S'poreans
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->I REFER to the letter by Madam Lim Siew Imm ('CPF disadvantage', Dec 20), suggesting that CPF contribution rates for permanent residents (PRs) be pegged to those of Singaporeans. The employer's CPF contribution rates for a PR are 4 per cent and 9 per cent in the first and second years respectively after obtaining PR status. From the third year onwards, both the employee and the employer have to pay the full CPF contribution rates.
The phased increase in CPF contribution rates does not give the PR a competitive advantage. On the contrary, because of the employer CPF contribution, the employee may become more expensive to his employer when he becomes a PR. By phasing in the increase, the employer will have time to adjust to the additional CPF contribution to manage the impact on his overall wage cost. Likewise, the PR employee will also have time to adjust to the reduction in take-home pay as a result of his contribution to CPF.
To help Singaporeans and companies manage the impact of the economic downturn, the Government has already introduced a range of measures, including the Tripartite Guidelines on Managing Excess Manpower and the Skills Programme for Upgrading and Resilience (Spur). In this regard, there is no need to adjust the CPF contribution rates for PRs. We thank Madam Lim for her suggestion.
Julia Ng (Ms)
Deputy Director, Corporate Communications
for Permanent Secretary
Ministry of Manpower
 

Cestbon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This complaint PR must be urgent to by property if not sure Madam LIm will not complaint.
 

annexa

Alfrescian
Loyal
1 PR work 2 years then run road.2 PRs ok. But every year how many become PR, work 2 years and run road? Like this our pay will forever be low even when gahmen increase HDB price, transport price etc! VOTE THEM OUT!
 

DerekLeung

Alfrescian
Loyal
Singaporeans would rather vote off the government then to have more PRs here taking over the show for everyone !
 
Top