• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP:We'll engage netizen on our own turf

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgF noWrap align=right width="1%">rom: </TD><TD class=msgFname noWrap width="68%">kojakbt22 <NOBR>
icon.aspx
</NOBR> </TD><TD class=msgDate noWrap align=right width="30%">10:56 pm </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT noWrap align=right width="1%" height=20>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname noWrap width="68%">ALL <NOBR></NOBR></TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right> (1 of 6) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft width="1%" rowSpan=4> </TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>5050.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>Citizens will be engaged through Reach

</TD></TR><TR><TD><!-- headline one : end --></TD></TR><TR><TD>Official feedback unit will be the main platform for Government

</TD></TR><TR><TD><!-- Author --></TD></TR><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By Li Xueying, Political Correspondent
</TD></TR><TR><TD><!-- show image if available --></TD></TR><TR vAlign=bottom><TD width=330>
ST_IMAGES_P1BLURBS10-WCV.jpg

</TD><TD width=10>
c.gif
</TD><TD vAlign=bottom>
c.gif

Rear-Admiral (NS) Lui (centre) thinks bloggers may not want the Government on their websites, but Dr Lee (right) did not rule out such e-engagement in future. -- ST PHOTO: LAU FOOK KONG
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

THE Government will engage citizens online more actively - but on its own turf.

Reach, its official feedback unit, will become the main platform through which it will interact with netizens.
Responding to individual blogs and forum postings - a recommendation by the Advisory Council on the Impact of New Media on Society (Aims) - will require a huge amount of resources and be 'extremely difficult', said Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts Lee Boon Yang.
But he underlined the Government's commitment to e-engagement.
Asked about Aims' call for the Government to be more open in engaging with the diversity of views on the Internet, he said: 'This mindset change has already taken place; the Government is fully into e-engagement.' For instance, ministries are using tools such as Facebook.
He added: 'But we are in the early days and we will continue to work on it; we will continue to improve on it.'
So Reach will be given more resources and beefed up.
Its chairman Amy Khor promised this: All views left on its portal will be read, will likely be responded to - and could possibly even lead to changes 'if the idea is good'.
Another aspect of its appeal is this: 'The interested citizen will be able to see just from one portal - rather than from different websites at different ministries, what the Government is consulting on, what are the current hotly-debated issues, and what his involvement can be or what he could contribute in terms of policymaking, in terms of bringing about change,' she added.
At the same time, Reach will look at closing the feedback loop by formally recognising well thought-out suggestions.
But is the Government preaching merely to the converted - those who would go to its website? What about the disenfranchised clicking and typing elsewhere?
Responding, Senior Minister of State for Information, Communications and the Arts Lui Tuck Yew said: 'The question really is, with that group, should we intrude on their space? Would they welcome such an intrusion? Maybe the way to do it is to provide a platform where if they choose to, they can at least start that process of engagement.'
Added Dr Lee: 'Websites are springing up by the thousands every minute. It's just not possible for Government to go out there and reach (out) to every website.'
But he said the Government will, from now, reply to letters sent online to the mainstream media if this is warranted.
And recognising that ministries and agencies need to have a deeper understanding of the new media, it will invest in training its employees in this.
Aims chairman Cheong Yip Seng said that overall, the measures are a major step forward, and will 'lead to greater use of the new media for discussion between the Government and its people'.
However, on the decision to use Reach as its main platform, he said: 'I'm not 100 per cent convinced that the Government needs to be this cautious - there are reasoned and constructive views online although in my view, the bulk of online chatter is not worth responding to.
'But maybe with greater online experience they will engage this group.'
Added blogger Gerald Giam: 'No one is expecting the Government to respond to all blogs. But this should not prevent them from responding to some blogs, particularly those of serious socio-political bloggers who make cogent and rational suggestions in their posts.
'It is true that not all bloggers welcomed the Government's voice on their private blogs, but there are some that do welcome a response.'
Yesterday, Dr Lee did not close the door on this possibility: 'Once we acquire this capability, we have more experience, better knowledge of the key players in new media that are active in their debates and discussions, we will consider which are the ones that have the standing, that have the objectivity and the accountability to provide a platform on which Government should also engage. 'Over time, we hope we will be reaching not just those people who want to be reached, but also communicate with all Singaporeans interested to know the facts behind various government policies and issues debated in the public domain.'
[email protected]

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

newyorker88

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hahaha, provided that people want to read what they write.

Welcome more clinton666 and likes of his here. That is how the gov responds to millions out there.
 

Zeitgeist

Alfrescian
Loyal
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iBywRYQiZ4M&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iBywRYQiZ4M&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 

PAPsupporter

Alfrescian
Loyal
Reach is a registered site for all political means. The great PAP wanted to understand more about Singaporeans in order to improve and grow to greater success.
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually, this is one thing I agree partly with the PAP government.

It isn't possible when everyone starts their own channels and expect the government to enter and engage - we will merely end up with a lot of attention seekers taking up taxpayers' money, which is only just that bit better that the PAP taking up taxpayers' money and not doing anything about some things.
 

cass888

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually, this is one thing I agree partly with the PAP government.

It isn't possible when everyone starts their own channels and expect the government to enter and engage - we will merely end up with a lot of attention seekers taking up taxpayers' money, which is only just that bit better that the PAP taking up taxpayers' money and not doing anything about some things.

Yeah, e.g. a certain Thomas Loh who insists that the banking industry owes him a living.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
Actually, this is one thing I agree partly with the PAP government.

It isn't possible when everyone starts their own channels and expect the government to enter and engage - we will merely end up with a lot of attention seekers taking up taxpayers' money, which is only just that bit better that the PAP taking up taxpayers' money and not doing anything about some things.

hmm... do correct me if i'm mistaken, for a moment i thought Ms. Chua L. H. thought that contents in the internet ought to be taken with a pinch of salt... why would the PAP interested be interested in engaging Netizens then? :eek:
 
Top