• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP report card on governance

fanta

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
434
Points
18
Lets see how PAP score on the four broad attributes of Goh's governance:



<HR>
  • Accountability and Transparency
Failed! The Jinx just lost A$400 million to some milkman. Who is she accountable to? Why is she not fired? How many millions of dollars must we lose before we realize the Jinx is not doing the job right?

  • Capacity for long-term planning and execution
Failed! If there's long term planning, why stop at two and now the more the better? If there's long term planning, how come no iron grills on the toilet window? Now put iron grill, is it a little too late?

  • Social Justice and Harmony
Failed! If got social justice, why are there 2 different standards in Singapore? There is one standard for the elite, and another for the peasants? Yet, there is another one for FTs!

  • Culture of grooming talent for public service
Failed! If there is culture of grooming talent for public service, why do we need FTs like LBW?


<HR>



SM Goh on governance

For good governance, four broad attributes are needed, he says

By Caryn Yeo, For The Straits Times

ln-asia-factors.jpg

Mr Goh said a successful political system needed at least four broad attributes: accountability and transparency; capacity for long-term planning and execution; social justice and harmony; and a culture of grooming talent for public service. -- PHOTO: ASSOCIATED PRESS

HONG KONG - NO ONE political system can claim to be the best for generating sustained economic growth, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong said here yesterday.

But he said a successful political system needed at least four broad attributes: accountability and transparency; capacity for long-term planning and execution; social justice and harmony; and a culture of grooming talent for public service.

He addressed 500 leaders from Hong Kong's government, business, academic and media sectors at the Asia Society Hong Kong Centre's annual dinner. The centre is a branch of the Asia Society based in New York.

While the current global financial mess has spared no region, Mr Goh said he believed that 'when the dust settles, most emerging East Asian economies will be set to resume strong growth' and that the United States would still emerge first among equals.

'The main lesson I take away from the history of financial crises, in particular the 1997 Asian financial crisis and the present crisis, is that 'Asian triumphalism' and Western 'liberal historical determinism' are both not borne out by the empirical evidence.'

He pointed to Asian economic powerhouses India and China's vastly different political systems.

Under a one-party government, China has enjoyed average annual growth rates of close to 10 per cent, while India, the world's largest democracy, has also seen comparable growth rates.

Sustained growth was possible under different kinds of political systems, he said, as he described four broad attributes of successful political systems.

First, accountability and transparency were needed for long-term stability. Governments must govern with the consent of the governed, he said.

Second, governments must formulate policies for the long-term public good, even if these are unpopular in the short-term.

Third, there must be equal opportunities for citizens to compete and succeed. Only then can leaders enjoy wide support and ensure sustained growth.

Fourth is a culture of identifying and grooming talent for public service, to attract the best brains to join and work in the government.

Asked during the question-and-answer session about a lack of transparency in China, Mr Goh said that China had come a long way, but because it was a huge country, it could not move that quickly into an open system.

'Look at the Soviet Union: when they opened up too quickly, the Soviet Union collapsed. China saw that. Restructure the economy first, then they can slowly, at their own time, open up politically,' he said.

He arrived on Monday for a five-day working visit to Hong Kong and Macau. Yesterday morning, he met Secretary for Development Carrie Lam.

He and Mrs Goh were hosted to lunch by an old friend, Mr Tung Chee Hwa, former Hong Kong chief executive and now vice-chairman of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.

He will meet Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang today.

[email protected]
 
You got a point no doubt, but the principles outlined by GCT appear to make sense and to his credit he is not saying that the Asian Model is better than the Western Liberal Democracy Model.

Lets see how PAP score on the four broad attributes of Goh's governance:



<HR>
  • Accountability and Transparency
Failed! The Jinx just lost A$400 million to some milkman. Who is she accountable to? Why is she not fired? How many millions of dollars must we lose before we realize the Jinx is not doing the job right?

  • Capacity for long-term planning and execution
Failed! If there's long term planning, why stop at two and now the more the better? If there's long term planning, how come no iron grills on the toilet window? Now put iron grill, is it a little too late?

  • Social Justice and Harmony
Failed! If got social justice, why are there 2 different standards in Singapore? There is one standard for the elite, and another for the peasants? Yet, there is another one for FTs!

  • Culture of grooming talent for public service
Failed! If there is culture of grooming talent for public service, why do we need FTs like LBW?


<HR>



com[/EMAIL]
 
I vomited my breakfast reading GCT's theory and than I calmed myself immediately. We all know that talking theory is cheap but in practice you see the speaker doing otherwise and forced or rather falsed us to believe what they did is good. Did we not hear what LKY said about MP's pay? in theory they should serve the community and not greed but in practice if we do not pay them astronomical salary it does not work. So theory is for the peasant to digest and practical is for the Papee pocket.
 
67 and all white hair oredi. Look older and more haggard than Tony. BS ruins your life.
 
Lets see how PAP score on the four broad attributes of Goh's governance:



<HR>
  • Accountability and Transparency
Failed! The Jinx just lost A$400 million to some milkman. Who is she accountable to? Why is she not fired? How many millions of dollars must we lose before we realize the Jinx is not doing the job right?

  • Capacity for long-term planning and execution
Failed! If there's long term planning, why stop at two and now the more the better? If there's long term planning, how come no iron grills on the toilet window? Now put iron grill, is it a little too late?

  • Social Justice and Harmony
Failed! If got social justice, why are there 2 different standards in Singapore? There is one standard for the elite, and another for the peasants? Yet, there is another one for FTs!

  • Culture of grooming talent for public service
Failed! If there is culture of grooming talent for public service, why do we need FTs like LBW?


<HR>



SM Goh on governance

For good governance, four broad attributes are needed, he says

By Caryn Yeo, For The Straits Times

ln-asia-factors.jpg

Mr Goh said a successful political system needed at least four broad attributes: accountability and transparency; capacity for long-term planning and execution; social justice and harmony; and a culture of grooming talent for public service. -- PHOTO: ASSOCIATED PRESS

HONG KONG - NO ONE political system can claim to be the best for generating sustained economic growth, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong said here yesterday.

But he said a successful political system needed at least four broad attributes: accountability and transparency; capacity for long-term planning and execution; social justice and harmony; and a culture of grooming talent for public service.

He addressed 500 leaders from Hong Kong's government, business, academic and media sectors at the Asia Society Hong Kong Centre's annual dinner. The centre is a branch of the Asia Society based in New York.

While the current global financial mess has spared no region, Mr Goh said he believed that 'when the dust settles, most emerging East Asian economies will be set to resume strong growth' and that the United States would still emerge first among equals.

'The main lesson I take away from the history of financial crises, in particular the 1997 Asian financial crisis and the present crisis, is that 'Asian triumphalism' and Western 'liberal historical determinism' are both not borne out by the empirical evidence.'

He pointed to Asian economic powerhouses India and China's vastly different political systems.

Under a one-party government, China has enjoyed average annual growth rates of close to 10 per cent, while India, the world's largest democracy, has also seen comparable growth rates.

Sustained growth was possible under different kinds of political systems, he said, as he described four broad attributes of successful political systems.

First, accountability and transparency were needed for long-term stability. Governments must govern with the consent of the governed, he said.

Second, governments must formulate policies for the long-term public good, even if these are unpopular in the short-term.

Third, there must be equal opportunities for citizens to compete and succeed. Only then can leaders enjoy wide support and ensure sustained growth.

Fourth is a culture of identifying and grooming talent for public service, to attract the best brains to join and work in the government.

Asked during the question-and-answer session about a lack of transparency in China, Mr Goh said that China had come a long way, but because it was a huge country, it could not move that quickly into an open system.

'Look at the Soviet Union: when they opened up too quickly, the Soviet Union collapsed. China saw that. Restructure the economy first, then they can slowly, at their own time, open up politically,' he said.

He arrived on Monday for a five-day working visit to Hong Kong and Macau. Yesterday morning, he met Secretary for Development Carrie Lam.

He and Mrs Goh were hosted to lunch by an old friend, Mr Tung Chee Hwa, former Hong Kong chief executive and now vice-chairman of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference.

He will meet Hong Kong Chief Executive Donald Tsang today.

[email protected]

The usual PAP hyperbole targeted at overseas audience not conversant with what is going on under a fascist dictatorship.
 
Someone from the audience asked GCT what sort of FT Singapore was looking for, and GCT replied "any FT to help Singapore grow and develop except crooked FT":D

The usual PAP hyperbole targeted at overseas audience not conversant with what is going on under a fascist dictatorship.
 
talk rot... just steamroll over singaporeans will do... and cut the bullshit of good governance... if what goh says is the truth... then there is no need to gerrymander and pervert the electoral rules in favor of the pap...
 
Back
Top