- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,143
- Points
- 113
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Serious PAP Kay Loong Court more than 50% discont God's Con Man Kong Hee Sentence, CB!
- Thread starter kangaroo.corpse
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,143
- Points
- 113
Re: Singapore Kangaroo Courts give discount to Foreigners and Rich people. CB law
just curious to know the Bill Size ( S$$$ ) incurred by all , eg AG , CAD etc...
are these payable by KH and his Team ?????
just curious to know the Bill Size ( S$$$ ) incurred by all , eg AG , CAD etc...
are these payable by KH and his Team ?????
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 35,575
- Points
- 113
Re: Singapore Kangaroo Courts give discount to Foreigners and Rich people. CB law
Altogether now!!! Huat ah!!!
Altogether now!!! Huat ah!!!
Re: Singapore Kangaroo Courts give discount to Foreigners and Rich people. CB law
do u know what is caesarean ?
do u know what is caesarean ?
Re: Singapore Kangaroo Courts give discount to Foreigners and Rich people. CB law
paid by all the CHC gong kia members lo
paid by all the CHC gong kia members lo
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 35,575
- Points
- 113
Re: Singapore Kangaroo Courts give discount to Foreigners and Rich people. CB law
Hmm... maybe you guys are right. CS normally maximum 3 times...
Hmm... maybe you guys are right. CS normally maximum 3 times...
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2013
- Messages
- 17,813
- Points
- 113
Re: Singapore Kangaroo Courts give discount to Foreigners and Rich people. CB law
this is why they say if u want to commit a crime,go big or go home.take the wolf of wall street for example,he conned out of over 300 million dollars,all he got was 2 years in a high class penitentiary resort.
dont go robbing a seven eleven or something like some stupid abangs,u are liable to get slapped with aggravated armed robbery and thrown into jail for six years.go rob a casino or something.its not crime doesnt pay,small crime doesnt pay.
this is why they say if u want to commit a crime,go big or go home.take the wolf of wall street for example,he conned out of over 300 million dollars,all he got was 2 years in a high class penitentiary resort.
dont go robbing a seven eleven or something like some stupid abangs,u are liable to get slapped with aggravated armed robbery and thrown into jail for six years.go rob a casino or something.its not crime doesnt pay,small crime doesnt pay.
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- Messages
- 970
- Points
- 28
Re: Singapore Kangaroo Courts give discount to Foreigners and Rich people. CB law
All of them reqested to delay serving jail by at least 2 weeks, reasons cited are to spend time with family and celebrate easter day. Like that, all those convicted by courts to go prison yesterday should entitle to the same treatment. Amos Yee should have requested to delay his jail term to spend time with his mother....
All of them reqested to delay serving jail by at least 2 weeks, reasons cited are to spend time with family and celebrate easter day. Like that, all those convicted by courts to go prison yesterday should entitle to the same treatment. Amos Yee should have requested to delay his jail term to spend time with his mother....
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2013
- Messages
- 17,813
- Points
- 113
Re: Singapore Kangaroo Courts give discount to Foreigners and Rich people. CB law
That's cause Amos Yee spit upon the loving embrace of Jesus Christ.
That's cause Amos Yee spit upon the loving embrace of Jesus Christ.
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2014
- Messages
- 174
- Points
- 0
It surely and seriously makes a mockery of the whole judicial system when they are entitled to so much indulgences over other CONVICTS.
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
- Messages
- 4,143
- Points
- 113
Re: Singapore Kangaroo Courts give discount to Foreigners and Rich people. CB law
Kh and team do the crimes of about s$50M /-. But if govt have to spend say s$50M of taxpayers'money
to put them behind bars then i worry.
Read some where those who do white collar con jobs have to put for govt's bill prosecution costs.
Kh and team do the crimes of about s$50M /-. But if govt have to spend say s$50M of taxpayers'money
to put them behind bars then i worry.
Read some where those who do white collar con jobs have to put for govt's bill prosecution costs.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2013
- Messages
- 17,813
- Points
- 113
theres bigger lashback from hurting the feelings of the christian community then some pissant convict no one cares about.30 percent of sinkie chinks are christians,thats a large number we are talking about.
this is what democracy is all about..... pandering to the majority,pandering to ur voter base,pandering to the religious groups,the special interest groups,the minorities(not just race,it can be the elderly or gender or sexual orientation) so u can win elections and stay in power,u think democracy is about whats right or wrong?its the same here in singapore as in america.
thats why they say democracy is the ugliest invention ever,
Majority rule. The only method that can turn even a mistake into truth.(sinkies rather believe a lie than the truth(or their own version of the truth like trump tards).)
A formula of building blocks that pursues conspiring instead of happiness.(70 percent would rather conspire and die together than lose face and admit they were wrong.)
Our inequality. Our unfair equation.
What can truly be said as something humanity has invented in mathematical history is probably this and only this.
And, this is the ugliest formula in human history.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2011
- Messages
- 6,483
- Points
- 113
discounted sentence is derisory. hope KH eill do time nonetheless,no special cell, hope he repent in jail.
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2014
- Messages
- 3,304
- Points
- 63
City Harvest appeal: AGC is considering whether it is possible to take further steps, says Shanmugam
SINGAPORE - The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) is considering whether it is possible to take further steps on the City Harvest Church case and will decide by early next week, said Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam on Saturday (Apr 8).
All six church leaders convicted of criminal breach of trust got their sentences reduced by a three-judge panel under the appeal verdict released a day earlier.
In November 2015, the six, including church founder Kong Hee, were handed jail terms ranging from 21 months to eight years in the largest case of misuse of charitable funds in Singapore history.
All six appealed against their conviction, while the AGC appealed against the sentences for being too low.
Mr Shanmugam, who was at a racial and religious harmony event in Toa Payoh on Saturday, said: "The media is reporting that the matter is over, that this is final. Not quite. The matter is not over yet."
He told reporters that the Government agreed with the AGC's view that the original sentence was too low.
Church founder Kong Hee was originally handed an eight-year jail sentence, which was reduced to 3 1/2 years on Friday. The other five church leaders also had their jail terms reduced after the court, in a split 2-1 decision, found them guilty of a less serious charge of criminal breach of trust.
Referring to three High Court judges and one State Court judge who heard the case, Mr Shanmugam said that in terms of judges, two judges had thought that the sentences should stay or be raised. Another two judges thought the sentences should be lower, which resulted in the eventual decision to reduce the sentence.
The key reason was that the church directors were not considered to be agents, as laid out under Section 409 of the Penal Code which deals with criminal breach of trust. The judges thus found them guilty of a reduced charge of criminal breach of trust.
Said Mr Shanmugam: "From the Government's point of view, this reasoning, this legal reasoning has serious implications in other cases, including corruption cases and our zero-tolerance approach for the future.
"We will have to consider as a matter of policy what other steps to take because we cannot relax our stand on that," he said, citing as examples where directors take bribes. The minister said he had "asked AGC to advise whether we need to do anything".
But he also sounded a note of caution as he said:"I can understand that people have different views on the High Court judgment." Mr Shanmugam said that while people have a right to have their views on the judgment, they should be careful about abusing judges personally or "casting improper ulterior motives" on the judgments.
"The reasoning is there, they set it out, we agree, disagree, and from a Government point of view if we disagree then we always consider what we do. If necessary we legislate through Parliament," he said.
The six church leaders had channelled $24 million from CHC's building fund into sham bonds in music production company Xtron and glass-maker Firna. They used the money to fund the singing career of Kong's wife, Ms Ho Yeow Sun, as part of the Crossover Project, a church mission which they said was to evangelise through Ms Ho's music.
Later, another $26 million was used to cover up the sham bond investments.
Mr Shanmugam said he has "also noted the court's comments on the way the matter was handled by the prosecution".
The High Court had, in its judgment, commented on how the prosecution had run its case.
The court noted that the prosecution had not focused on any gain to third parties due to the church leaders' actions, even though this may have been suggested in the charges.
While the prosecution did attempt to touch on the gains by Kong's wife, Ms Sun, this point was not raised in its written submissions for the appeal and was also not raised before the Judge.
"In the circumstances, we approach the sentencing in this case as one without any element of wrongful gain or personal financial benefit, either direct or indirect," said the judgment.
Mr Shanmugam said that he had asked the new Attorney-General Lucien Wong and deputy Attorney-Generals to look into the matter.
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapo...rce=Facebook&xtor=CS1-10#link_time=1491634523
SINGAPORE - The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) is considering whether it is possible to take further steps on the City Harvest Church case and will decide by early next week, said Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam on Saturday (Apr 8).
All six church leaders convicted of criminal breach of trust got their sentences reduced by a three-judge panel under the appeal verdict released a day earlier.
In November 2015, the six, including church founder Kong Hee, were handed jail terms ranging from 21 months to eight years in the largest case of misuse of charitable funds in Singapore history.
All six appealed against their conviction, while the AGC appealed against the sentences for being too low.
Mr Shanmugam, who was at a racial and religious harmony event in Toa Payoh on Saturday, said: "The media is reporting that the matter is over, that this is final. Not quite. The matter is not over yet."
He told reporters that the Government agreed with the AGC's view that the original sentence was too low.
Church founder Kong Hee was originally handed an eight-year jail sentence, which was reduced to 3 1/2 years on Friday. The other five church leaders also had their jail terms reduced after the court, in a split 2-1 decision, found them guilty of a less serious charge of criminal breach of trust.
Referring to three High Court judges and one State Court judge who heard the case, Mr Shanmugam said that in terms of judges, two judges had thought that the sentences should stay or be raised. Another two judges thought the sentences should be lower, which resulted in the eventual decision to reduce the sentence.
The key reason was that the church directors were not considered to be agents, as laid out under Section 409 of the Penal Code which deals with criminal breach of trust. The judges thus found them guilty of a reduced charge of criminal breach of trust.
Said Mr Shanmugam: "From the Government's point of view, this reasoning, this legal reasoning has serious implications in other cases, including corruption cases and our zero-tolerance approach for the future.
"We will have to consider as a matter of policy what other steps to take because we cannot relax our stand on that," he said, citing as examples where directors take bribes. The minister said he had "asked AGC to advise whether we need to do anything".
But he also sounded a note of caution as he said:"I can understand that people have different views on the High Court judgment." Mr Shanmugam said that while people have a right to have their views on the judgment, they should be careful about abusing judges personally or "casting improper ulterior motives" on the judgments.
"The reasoning is there, they set it out, we agree, disagree, and from a Government point of view if we disagree then we always consider what we do. If necessary we legislate through Parliament," he said.
The six church leaders had channelled $24 million from CHC's building fund into sham bonds in music production company Xtron and glass-maker Firna. They used the money to fund the singing career of Kong's wife, Ms Ho Yeow Sun, as part of the Crossover Project, a church mission which they said was to evangelise through Ms Ho's music.
Later, another $26 million was used to cover up the sham bond investments.
Mr Shanmugam said he has "also noted the court's comments on the way the matter was handled by the prosecution".
The High Court had, in its judgment, commented on how the prosecution had run its case.
The court noted that the prosecution had not focused on any gain to third parties due to the church leaders' actions, even though this may have been suggested in the charges.
While the prosecution did attempt to touch on the gains by Kong's wife, Ms Sun, this point was not raised in its written submissions for the appeal and was also not raised before the Judge.
"In the circumstances, we approach the sentencing in this case as one without any element of wrongful gain or personal financial benefit, either direct or indirect," said the judgment.
Mr Shanmugam said that he had asked the new Attorney-General Lucien Wong and deputy Attorney-Generals to look into the matter.
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapo...rce=Facebook&xtor=CS1-10#link_time=1491634523
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2014
- Messages
- 3,304
- Points
- 63
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2016
- Messages
- 3,723
- Points
- 113
If only they had brought the Horse into the fray.
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 37,364
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2016
- Messages
- 35,356
- Points
- 113
Choor Singh....he will cane all of them, including Serina...
Replace Serina with this bitch.
How the fuck is this Wukong whore a christian and a pastor, those fucking worshippers are fucking blind, this whore is satan's whore, she doesn't even need to disguise her whoreiness, every inch of her is a slut, a cheap fucking slut.
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2016
- Messages
- 2,405
- Points
- 83
I thought high court is the last appeal already?
still can appeal and reappeal?
what is the max times?
