• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Orchard Road did not flood by FT Foreign Talent Richard Hartung

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
13,160
Points
0
Orchard Road did not flood
by Richard Hartung
05:55 AM Jun 28, 2010

<--- http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC100628-0000053/Orchard-Road-did-not-flood


The real news last Friday was that Orchard Road did not flood. Even as headlines focused on floods in Bishan or Chai Chee and a fallen tree on the Central Expressway, what's really remarkable was that water flowed smoothly in the drains along Orchard Road.

It is not that the rain was not torrential. PUB said that once again this past week, just like the week before, 100mm of rain fell within about one hour. The big difference was that shops along Orchard Road stayed dry this time and shops in other parts of the island flooded.

What's also different is that there had been a sudden flurry of activity around the Orchard Road area over the past week.

After the Orchard Road flood, PUB chief executive Khoo Teng Chye said his agency would take action to prevent a recurrence and PUB got to work right away. A photo on Thursday showed gratings being installed in drains along Holland Road as part of improvements from there to the drains behind Tanglin Shopping Centre. Small bulldozers were used to clear debris, too.

After the Orchard floods, PUB's Mr Khoo also told the media that "we were, frankly, a little bit caught off-guard by what happened at Stamford Canal. But, of course, now that becomes a new hot spot."

Unfortunately, there are still more new hot spots now. Along with Bishan and Chai Chee, shops and roads flooded in Changi Road, Toh Tuck and other locations around the island. The Singapore Civil Defence Force even had to rescue children from a childcare centre in Telok Kurau.

The damage just from the two recent floods is tremendous. Losses were estimated at more than $6 million along Orchard Road on June 16 and at nearly $1 million or more on June 25, excluding the cost of rescue efforts and commuters' time traversing around the floods.

It is hard to estimate the cost of Singapore's tarnished reputation for efficiency and preparedness.

The key issue is what to do next.

The short-term solution seems easy. Since shops along Orchard Road did not get flooded again, cleaning drains and installing grates seems like a quick fix to handle massive amounts of water.

An immediate priority could be to focus on detecting similar problems and preventing them island-wide. Every day, Mr Khoo said, more than 360 contractors spread out across the island to maintain the drains.

Along with this regular maintenance, an urgent inspection of the drains would enable contractors to check flood-prone areas quickly, clean out clogged drains and install grates.

The floods seem to be more than a short-term problem though, and flood-prone areas may have expanded beyond the "only about 66 hectares" that the PUB currently estimates. More frequent heavy rain seems likely - though hopefully not every week - so developing a longer-term strategy seems better than simply jumping from one hot spot to the next.

Although PUB has not talked much about new longer term plans so far, planning in other countries provides constructive examples of what could be considered.

While the Netherlands has a bigger problem with water than Singapore, it provides one model. A Delta Committee undertook a detailed study, presented its findings in 2008 and said "its recommendations must be future-proof". The Netherlands plans to spend up to €1.6 billion ($2.7 billion) per year to strengthen dykes and prevent flooding.

Hong Kong, which gets 2.2m of rain per year, offers another example. It has a dedicated Drainage Services Department (DSD), with a budget of more than HK$1.8 billion ($322 million), that is tasked with providing "world-class wastewater and storm water drainage services". It regularly develops and improves its Drainage Master Plan and Flood Control Strategy Studies.

While Committees and Studies won't solve everything, convening experts to analyse current practices and developing a longer-term strategic plan could be prudent.

And even though Singapore's smaller size and not yet needing to build dykes means that it does not need a Netherlands-sized budget, reviewing the annual budgets here of $23 million for maintenance and $150 million for drainage improvement could be beneficial.

After one large flood along Bukit Timah last year and two big floods around the island already this year, doing more than business-as-usual could be appropriate.




The writer is a consultant who has lived in Singapore since 1992
 
GHAHAHHAHAHA

Another one sucking MIW's cocks

Good

Grant him another contract!!!
Give him another project to work on!!
 
wahlaneh...
yayacok alady dived in to clean up those longkang liao if still flooded then he must dive into ocean liao.
anyway, its like those expressways lor - they build here jam there build there jam here lor.
 
showimageCC.aspx


The public has high expectations of agencies like the PUB and NEA,
as well as the police and civil defence force to respond quickly to
flood-related incidents, but Singaporeans also need to learn to
cope with acts of God, says the author. WEE TECK HIAN
Copyright © MediaCorp Press Ltd
 

Woefully ill-prepared?

Is Singapore flood-prevention strategy inadequate?

by Eugene K B Tan
05:55 AM Jun 28, 2010

Is Singapore woefully ill-prepared to handle sudden, heavy downpours?

This must be a question on the minds of many as the island suffered flash floods in several areas last Friday - for the second time in 10 days.

Or are Singaporeans over-reacting and expecting too much of the Public Utilities Board (PUB) when it comes to flood prevention here?

It would be convenient to point the finger at the PUB. This is particularly so in light of its admission on June 17 that a debris-clogged drain in the Stamford Canal contributed to the flooding of Orchard Road during the first flash floods.

Further, it would be natural to ask if more can be done notwithstanding that PUB - after investing more than $2 billion to upgrade our drainage system - has reduced the size of our flood-prone areas from 3,200 hectares in '70s to 66 hectares today.

So, even with the Marina Barrage being operational, the increased occurrence of localised flooding is bound to drive demanding Singaporeans to say "not good enough".

While more can certainly be done to enhance the island's flood management capabilities, an equally important question that needs to be asked is whether doing so would be cost-effective, given that a zero tolerance of flooding is not at all realistic.

Would spending billions of dollars to prepare for a flash flood that occurs, say, once in 10 years with minimal damage be prudent expenditure?

Similarly, while transport security must be enhanced because of the recent vandalism of an SMRT train, we do not expect our public transport operators to ring fence their depots like Fort Knox.

More pertinently, is our flood prevention strategy due for an overhaul in light of evolving changes?

I am not a climate researcher and two major floods in 10 days maybe an inadequate basis to attribute Singapore's evolving vulnerability to climate change.

However, while scientific evidence may be ambivalent, it has become clearer that global warming has increased the frequency of extreme rains and annual rainfall. The possibility of global- and micro-climate changes affecting Singapore should not be discounted.

We should see the flash floods as an opportunity for a thorough review of how climate change is affecting Singapore.

Such a review could also help to address real and relevant issues related to transforming Singapore into a liveable and sustainable city.

After all, most of the island is not more than 15m above sea level, with our business district, airport and container ports lying no more than 2m above sea level.

Being highly urbanised means the drainage system has to cope with the bulk of the rainfall - more so during an intense downpour coinciding with a high tide.

Do our topographical and urban realities mean that we should recalibrate our expectations? Is 100mm of rainfall in an hour a norm we should prepare for?

Do we need to re-look or even overhaul our flood prevention and alleviation framework in light of likely changes to the weather patterns? Beyond the hardware and infrastructure, are we doing enough to upgrade our mindsets to deal with the ever-changing climate situation?

As the Orchard-Scotts Roads flood demonstrated, the Stamford Canal could have easily coped with the deluge, but it did not.

A confluence of factors conspired to make the heavy rain that morning so damaging: Two intense rainstorms within a two-hour period, a blocked canal drain, and the deployment of stand-by contractors and staff to other hotspots which were assessed to be more likely to flood.

The management of older buildings like Lucky Plaza could have been better prepared to cope as well.

There is no doubt that the public has high expectations of the authorities.

The PUB and National Environment Agency are expected to provide timely and detailed flood advisories. Other agencies such as the police and civil defence force need to respond quickly to flood-related incidents, traffic jams, road diversions, fallen trees and the like.

Having said that, Singaporeans must also learn to cope with acts of God. Extreme events happen despite the best of pre-emptive efforts. It seems that expecting the entire island to be made immune from floods is, perhaps, asking too much.



The writer is assistant professor of law at the School of Law, Singapore Management University
 
Flooding once every 10 years that causes minimal damage is probably acceptable. But what we have observed is two episodes of flooding in two WEEKS! I've problems with that especially when our ministers pay themselves those obscene salaries. We must have one of the lowest rates of return in this aspect.

Second, things have got worse with the huge spending on infrastructure, not better. Previously, we needed many hours of heavy rain which coincided with a spring tide to flood. Now, flooding occurs after one to two hours of rain, regardless of tide.
 
Flooding once every 10 years that causes minimal damage is probably acceptable. But what we have observed is two episodes of flooding in two WEEKS! I've problems with that especially when our ministers pay themselves those obscene salaries. We must have one of the lowest rates of return in this aspect.

Second, things have got worse with the huge spending on infrastructure, not better. Previously, we needed many hours of heavy rain which coincided with a spring tide to flood. Now, flooding occurs after one to two hours of rain, regardless of tide.

wahlaneh...
nowsday they build more buildings n dig more tunnels without redirecting or improving on drainage systems mah.
 
wahlaneh...
nowsday they build more buildings n dig more tunnels without redirecting or improving on drainage systems mah.

Build so many flats in Sengkangs but roads like fark . No better nor faster .

Imagine Sengkang so dense but the traffic like shit !
 
after so many eons of useless campaigns of anti littering - long kangs all still clogged. I still see China-men spitting and throwing rubbish everywhere (yes, I specifically said China-men becos they are the main fucking culprits).

then when flood comes, blame this blame that. Now blame people for littering to clog the drains...fuck lah, cannot step up the cleaning frequency ? Cannot impose stiffer punishments for littering? Impose caning for those caught littering- sure will scare people off. Some more, caning does not use up "living" space in the jails...
 
Fark the PAP man for bringing Chinamen who spitt and Indian men holding hands !
 
Looks like the PAP is now mounting a counter offensive designed to re-molding Sporeans expectations.

We are now told to adjust & accept to the new reality, The PAP can't do everything :rolleyes:

If Sporeans are expected to lower their expectations of what the PAP can do, then it's only fair that the PAP should lower their salaries to real world levels.
 
They adopt the Singhaha styles, no wonder integrating so well.

Promise you the sky, create great expectations to justify sky high salaries, create cock and bull stories to congratulate themselves and when promises dont materialize.....cock and bull stories and excuses..... if that also fail, then manage expectations......if all else fail, blame the consumer for being unreasonable and asking for too much.:mad:

Sounds familiar?

Looks like the PAP is now mounting a counter offensive designed to re-molding Sporeans expectations.

We are now told to adjust & accept to the new reality, The PAP can't do everything :rolleyes:

If Sporeans are expected to lower their expectations of what the PAP can do, then it's only fair that the PAP should lower their salaries to real world levels.
 
Fawning

–verb (used without object)
1.
To exhibit affection or attempt to please, as a dog does by wagging its tail, whining, or cringing.
2.
(of a dog) to behave affectionately.
3.
to seek notice or favor by servile demeanor: The courtiers fawned over the king.
4.
To seek favor or attention by flattery and obsequious behavior.
 
what changes recently? there must be a cause, but they dun tell us the truth.
 
Build so many flats in Sengkangs but roads like fark . No better nor faster .

Imagine Sengkang so dense but the traffic like shit !

wahlaneh...
they keep building higher n lower but never dig deeper n wider thats why lor.
 
Back
Top