• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Opposition-bashing in "Opposition unity" forum

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
i agree. i concur that. wholeheartedly.

but are the PAP apologists, are they flies, mosquitoes, and hornets which will harass the PAP mongrel dogs? or are they the PAP's dog accessories such as rubber dog teethers???

My dear sir, they are all we have! We have to make do with that when we go to the polls. Otw, let there be a thorough and proper shakeout, a sort of social Darwinism, so only the real McCoys of hornets, the mosquitoes, fleas, flies etc. survive and emerge fitter and stronger to take on the PAP. Then, get your act together, for the people's sake! If there is any intellectual life and political acumen in all of you, show us, the people! There's little precious time to be bashing each other's heads here. The PAP is laughing all the way to the booths.
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
My dear sir, they are all we have! We have to make do with that when we go to the polls. Otw, let there be a thorough and proper shakeout, a sort of social Darwinism, so only the real McCoys of hornets, the mosquitoes, fleas, flies etc. survive and emerge fitter and stronger to take on the PAP. Then, get your act together, for the people's sake! If there is any intellectual life and political acumen in all of you, show us, the people! There's little precious time to be bashing each other's heads here. The PAP is laughing all the way to the booths.

Any opposition party needs to convince voters that they are worth voting for more than PAP. To say you are the real opposition to vote for, others are PAP apologist opposition, even if you succeed in convincing, you are just 5% more than the rest. You get 30%, others 25%, still lose. Someone still needs to get it.
 

char_jig_kar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sure, sure. Harbans Singh acted alone. He wasn't leader of a now defunct party. The man who tried to oust 2 sec gens also acted alone.

- did harbans singh close rank with PAP?

- now, did i show u something substantial that YSL and WP close rank with the PAP?
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
- did harbans singh close rank with PAP?

- now, did i show u something substantial that YSL and WP close rank with the PAP?

I think people has said that YSL made a mistake but there were others whose mistakes benefitted the PAP more. Of course, your target is the WP, so why would you care about the POV of others.
 

char_jig_kar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Any opposition party needs to convince voters that they are worth voting for more than PAP. To say you are the real opposition to vote for, others are PAP apologist opposition, even if you succeed in convincing, you are just 5% more than the rest. You get 30%, others 25%, still lose. Someone still needs to get it.

u don't get it. if spore don't have the people to check on the PAP govt, then Spore has gotta buckle up. thats all. but we cant PRETEND that we have the people to check on the PAP. thats just delusional.
 

char_jig_kar

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think people has said that YSL made a mistake but there were others whose mistakes benefitted the PAP more. Of course, your target is the WP, so why would you care about the POV of others.

no, its about PAP apologist. are they PAP apologist, YSL and WP? obvious isn't it? they close rank with the PAP.
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
u don't get it. if spore don't have the people to check on the PAP govt, then Spore has gotta buckle up. thats all. but we cant PRETEND that we have the people to check on the PAP. thats just delusional.

Sure, go ahead. Support your fav opposition party to the full. Who's stopping you?
 

char_jig_kar

Alfrescian
Loyal
My dear sir, they are all we have! We have to make do with that when we go to the polls. Otw, let there be a thorough and proper shakeout, a sort of social Darwinism, so only the real McCoys of hornets, the mosquitoes, fleas, flies etc. survive and emerge fitter and stronger to take on the PAP. Then, get your act together, for the people's sake! If there is any intellectual life and political acumen in all of you, show us, the people! There's little precious time to be bashing each other's heads here. The PAP is laughing all the way to the booths.

they are all we have... look... didn't we laugh at the PAP gahmen when they form committee to check on themselves? for example, Wong Kang Seng, he formed a committee to check on the security lapse incident? and the committee are people he pick, some of the people are under him? something like that?

now, what difference is it, by getting PAP apologist to check on PAP?? PAP apologist find the PAP agreeable most of the time. they are like brothers. so isn't it problematic to have PAP apologist to check on the PAP???
 

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
No other period in Singapore's recent history has there been a better feeding ground for Oppposition politics. If the very disparate and disunited Opposition camp who have always claimed they want to make a difference to the lives of the people, and make the Opposition concept a reality, then if they can't now, WHEN?

Every political party leader is undeniably an egoistic fellow if not an egomaniac. So I think a lot of hurdles related to personnas, their super-egos emotional and political baggage has to be cleared aside if one wishes to see a more united fortified Opposition front. This perhaps may be too ideal.

The next best alternative is probably to meet and take a holistics approach and work out the grand electoral strategy, who and where to stand, to capitalise on the discontented ground to the last mile. If they can't agree under a single banner,at least agree to disagree and maximise their individual's potential by matching their strengths to their home grounds , capture the GRC or ward, and go on to Parliament to continue the fight. No matter that they may have entered by different paths, each should rise to the occasion to expose, to query, to challenge, and to ultimately hammer the PAP to the ground.
 

char_jig_kar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sure, go ahead. Support your fav opposition party to the full. Who's stopping you?

no. i think u misunderstood me.

i am not hung up in supporting SDP. i am not a member, i am not a fanatic of SDP. maybe the next GE, SDP candidate appear in my area, and i find him too laid back, and i don't like his attitude, and i will not vote him. even though he's a SDP.

but i stand by this: PAP apologist check on PAP, that, doesn't work.
 

char_jig_kar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Put it this way then, the choice YSL had is between PAP and another PAP apologist. He made his choice the same way you will make right?

huh? wat are u having now? marijuana salad?

i had said that I will not vote for the PAP. and i will boycott my vote if the candidate sound too much like a PAP.

YSL could have void his vote if his choice is between PAP and PAP apologist. he voted for the PAP when the choice is between PAP and SDP.
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
no. i think u misunderstood me.

i am not hung up in supporting SDP. i am not a member, i am not a fanatic of SDP. maybe the next GE, SDP candidate appear in my area, and i find him too laid back, and i don't like his attitude, and i will not vote him. even though he's a SDP.

but i stand by this: PAP apologist check on PAP, that, doesn't work.

Did I say you support the SDP? I am saying, if you don't want "PAP apologists" to get elected, support those you think are not. Make them look better than PAP. Try your luck to make them look better than anything outside PAP, whether they are "apologist" or not, maybe you will strike 4D.
 

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
they are all we have... look... didn't we laugh at the PAP gahmen when they form committee to check on themselves? for example, Wong Kang Seng, he formed a committee to check on the security lapse incident? and the committee are people he pick, some of the people are under him? something like that?

now, what difference is it, by getting PAP apologist to check on PAP?? PAP apologist find the PAP agreeable most of the time. they are like brothers. so isn't it problematic to have PAP apologist to check on the PAP???

Going by yr logic, you are exactly falling for LKY's argument that there is no party better than the PAP, if every Opp is one of their clones!! You will be conceding the argument that all roads lead to Rome, since to you, inevitably every one of the Opp ended up thinking, talking, breathing, living PAP?

So what are you saying?
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
huh? wat are u having now? marijuana salad?

i had said that I will not vote for the PAP. and i will boycott my vote if the candidate sound too much like a PAP.

YSL could have void his vote if his choice is between PAP and PAP apologist. he voted for the PAP when the choice is between PAP and SDP.

If YSL voted for SDP, would he be an "SDP apologist"?
 

char_jig_kar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Going by yr logic, you are exactly falling for LKY's argument that there is no party better than the PAP, if every Opp is one of their clones!! You will be conceding the argument that all roads lead to Rome, since to you, inevitably every one of the Opp ended up thinking, talking, breathing, living PAP?

So what are you saying?

what are u saying? why is it all Oppositions will end up like the PAP??
 

char_jig_kar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Did I say you support the SDP? I am saying, if you don't want "PAP apologists" to get elected, support those you think are not. Make them look better than PAP. Try your luck to make them look better than anything outside PAP, whether they are "apologist" or not, maybe you will strike 4D.

yea. thats what i am gonna. support people that i like.

and if its a PAP vs PAP apologist, well, i guess i could just stay home and enjoy the day off.
 

Perspective

Alfrescian
Loyal
no, that made him acting like a Opposition candidate should be. supporting fellow Opposition.

Don't make me spill my sides. You earlier POVs doesn't make anyone think that you see WP as an opposition, so why would you bother that they support a "fellow opposition".
 
Top