Open letter to PM Lee, all MPs & senior civil servants on Bullying of Roy Ngerng

[makapaaa]

[h=2]Open letter to PM Lee, all MPs & senior civil servants[/h]

May 24th, 2014 |

Author: Contributions

Lee Kuan Yew: 'We pay top money for top
talent.'


Apart from suing critics who are critical of your PAP administration, what
other talent and quality, may I ask, does your team possess?

See, on 23 January 2008, Channel News Asia reported MM Lee said the following
and I quote:

“We are transparent, we are not corrupt, and that gives an enormous advantage
for performance as well as investments. And we are meritocratic; we pay top
money for top talent, both local and foreign. In other words we have quality
people right on top,” said Mr Lee.
​

In short, MM Lee wanted us and the world to believe that Singapore had
quality people right on top since Singapore had paid top money for top
talent.

However, the performance of GIC, Temasek and CPF has been disappointing as
pointed out by Christopher Balding and Roy Ngerng.

It certainly does not go down well, at least not with me that Singapore had
quality people right on top as proclaimed by MM Lee even we were told that we
had paid top money for top talent. (Is Wong Can’t Sing a top talent and quality
people?)

It is even more disappointing and disgusting that none of the ministers, MPs
or super scale civil servants were able to rebut a rookie such as Roy Ngerng
without resorting to the old tricks of suing to prevent him from probing the CPF
matter which is of public interest to all Singaporeans.

Heck, didn’t MM Lee say that we had quality people right on top? So, why PAP
are all keeping quiet and not rebutting Roy Ngerng? Is it Roy is speaking the
truth? Too much loss by GIC and Temasek that CPF is now broke and not able to
meet its member drawn out?

For transparency sake, as claimed by MM Lee “We are transparent..” we, the
CPF members demand that the PAP administration comes clean on how our CPF is
managed and used and to answer all questions raised by Roy Ngerng, if not
Christopher Balding.

I, like the rest of other awakened and informed CPF members, are waiting for
the PAP administration to rebut and answer all questions raised by Roy
Ngerng.

But, don’t let us, the awakened and informed one, wait too
long.

A Cheated CPF
member

* Submitted by TRE reader.

 

[Tuayapeh]

Tarng ku ku".........

 

[god_zeus]

why lee kuan yew left side like melting, red red one...

 

[Tuayapeh]

why lee kuan yew left side like melting, red red one...

They had to slap the bastard to wake up him up from his senility..........



sooner or later liao .....better sooner than later.......

 

[sochi2014]

That is not a right way to treat a frail old man.

He no longer had the fighting spirit he used to have.

 

[po2wq]

That is not a right way to treat a frail old man.

He no longer had the fighting spirit he used to have.

continue paying a frail o man, who has not wat he used 2 haf, a million $ salary is a rite way? ...

 

[dumbo]

for a 60+ years old prime minister to ask for damages from a 25 year old kid who already apologized and took down the offending message is very shameful.

the kid already apologized and the old man still wants to destroy a kid. very vengeful...

 

[TeeKii]

That is not a right way to treat a frail old man.

He no longer had the fighting spirit he used to have.

Don't worry, Jesus will punish all of them. I'm with chew!

 

[laksaboy]

That is not a right way to treat a frail old man.

He no longer had the fighting spirit he used to have.

He still can muster up the spirit to talk shit. I'll believe 'frail' when I see his corpse.

 

[JHolmesJr]

for a 60+ years old prime minister to ask for damages from a 25 year old kid who already apologized and took down the offending message is very shameful.

the kid already apologized and the old man still wants to destroy a kid. very vengeful...

Its symbolic and meant to send a message to others who dont frame their criticism carefully.

 

[virus]

That is not a right way to treat a frail old man.

He no longer had the fighting spirit he used to have.

dun fark with him... wait he don his freddy cougar suit and drag his axe to meet you at hong lim park

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

Its symbolic and meant to send a message to others who dont frame their criticism carefully.

PinkyLoong has made it difficult for himself with this threat to sue. Pinky Loong asking for Roy to state the costs for the defamation is disingenuous as such costs are calculated by a judge. Not even Pinky Loong can decide this and yet Pinky Loong is demanding this from his adversary and for this amount to be made public. Roy should ask PinkyLoong how much he earns each month, for the past 10 years or for his time as PM so Roy can calculate the loss of income due to this so-called defamatory article. Roy also needs to know Pinky Loong's income to calculate the loss of face and to gauge the costs involved in Pinky Loong being psychologically hurt by the article.

Pinky Loong will have to state his incomes as GIC chairman and PM and all other salaries that he receives and state the incomes of all PAP MPs related to the handling of the CPF and taxpayers monies. Pinky Loong has gone on record as declaring that he will fix the opposition and reward his supporters. Pinky Loong must show that that statement of his has not been brought into fulfilment. Roy's article may have been premised by Pinky Loong's statement that he will reward his supporters. Since the CPF is a very large component of Pinky Loong's care, it can be seen as a fair statement to ask that Pinky Loong be more transparent on the CPF. There is also the case of how an engineer with little or no experience in fund management can be chosen to head one of our two state-owned funds, which is connected to our CPF. Pinky Loong will for sure prove his adversary wrong and provide us with all the information we need.

Roy will ask PM for his salary which should be made known since he is a public servant, a PM. Roy will then provide a satisfactory answer as to the PMs query for costings for the defamatory article. Pinky Loong will then proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that his statement to reward his supporters was made only to the extent that his supporters will received free toilet paper when visiting his residence and that no public funds was or will ever be used to reward his supporters.

Pinky Loong has a lot to answer to. Roy has correctly channelled the CPF issue into the limelight. I am assured that Pinky Loong will provide all the necessary
information so that he will not be seen as deliberately making opaque the difficult issues that surround him due to his statement of rewarding supporters. By leaving matters opaque Pinky Loong may be seen by others as a deliberate attempt to tempt his adversaries into making notices that can be seen as being defamatory.

 

[batman1]

The more greedy and ruthless he wants damages from Roy,the sooner he would be struck by cancer relapse.Retribution to the evil bastard.

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

The more greedy and ruthless he wants damages from Roy,the sooner he would be struck by cancer relapse.Retribution to the evil bastard.

AssLoong will embarrass himself and ensure his own downfall in 2016. Roy has done only 10% of damage. AssLoong will double the damage on hiw own. If this transgender continues to be PM after 2016 then you should all migrate. There is no point of return as FTs are already number 1 and more will be squeezed from Singaporeans.

 

[virus]

The more greedy and ruthless he wants damages from Roy,the sooner he would be struck by cancer relapse.Retribution to the evil bastard.

i rather he and his jinxjang gang kena cursed and killed in plane crash.

 

[Hans168]

for a 60+ years old prime minister to ask for damages from a 25 year old kid who already apologized and took down the offending message is very shameful.

the kid already apologized and the old man still wants to destroy a kid. very vengeful...

stupid ass shooting his own foot..........

 

[Equalisation]

AssLoong will embarrass himself and ensure his own downfall in 2016. Roy has done only 10% of damage. AssLoong will double the damage on hiw own. If this transgender continues to be PM after 2016 then you should all migrate. There is no point of return as FTs are already number 1 and more will be squeezed from Singaporeans.

Betul !

If not mistaken, as it is now, there is one citizen for every one foreigner !:o

 

[kingrant]

I will state $1 as the figure for the costs. Take it or leave it.

PinkyLoong has made it difficult for himself with this threat to sue. Pinky Loong asking for Roy to state the costs for the defamation is disingenuous as such costs are calculated by a judge. Not even Pinky Loong can decide this and yet Pinky Loong is demanding this from his adversary and for this amount to be made public. Roy should ask PinkyLoong how much he earns each month, for the past 10 years or for his time as PM so Roy can calculate the loss of income due to this so-called defamatory article. Roy also needs to know Pinky Loong's income to calculate the loss of face and to gauge the costs involved in Pinky Loong being psychologically hurt by the article.

Pinky Loong will have to state his incomes as GIC chairman and PM and all other salaries that he receives and state the incomes of all PAP MPs related to the handling of the CPF and taxpayers monies. Pinky Loong has gone on record as declaring that he will fix the opposition and reward his supporters. Pinky Loong must show that that statement of his has not been brought into fulfilment. Roy's article may have been premised by Pinky Loong's statement that he will reward his supporters. Since the CPF is a very large component of Pinky Loong's care, it can be seen as a fair statement to ask that Pinky Loong be more transparent on the CPF. There is also the case of how an engineer with little or no experience in fund management can be chosen to head one of our two state-owned funds, which is connected to our CPF. Pinky Loong will for sure prove his adversary wrong and provide us with all the information we need.

Roy will ask PM for his salary which should be made known since he is a public servant, a PM. Roy will then provide a satisfactory answer as to the PMs query for costings for the defamatory article. Pinky Loong will then proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that his statement to reward his supporters was made only to the extent that his supporters will received free toilet paper when visiting his residence and that no public funds was or will ever be used to reward his supporters.

Pinky Loong has a lot to answer to. Roy has correctly channelled the CPF issue into the limelight. I am assured that Pinky Loong will provide all the necessary
information so that he will not be seen as deliberately making opaque the difficult issues that surround him due to his statement of rewarding supporters. By leaving matters opaque Pinky Loong may be seen by others as a deliberate attempt to tempt his adversaries into making notices that can be seen as being defamatory.