- Joined
- Feb 20, 2010
- Messages
- 2,818
- Points
- 48
https://tw.news.yahoo.com/看錯1個0-銀行女副理匯1千萬變1億-客戶多領9千萬-095412511.html
看錯1個0…銀行女副理匯1千萬變1億 客戶多領9千萬
TVBS新聞網
2.7k 人追蹤
林保宏
2018年8月27日 下午9:37
一名銀行女副理把客戶的匯款數字看錯，導致對方溢領9千萬。(示意圖／TVBS)
一名任職於台北富邦銀行的陳姓女副理，日前在複核客戶的匯款資料時，不小心看錯數字，把1千萬匯成1億元；隨然隔天客戶就把多出的9千萬匯回，但陳女仍遭公司懲戒，年度考績打成乙等。她不服處分並自認遭到羞辱，向公司提出求償100萬並撤銷懲處；但法官認為陳女是資深主管，分辨存提款單的數字是銀行員的基本能力，因此駁回上訴。
陳女主張，她本來是松南分行的副理，表現也十分良好，2010年調到南港分行，但考績卻被打成甲等，年終獎金少領了25萬元。
另外陳女還表示，南港分行業務量大，2013年5月她在處理一間企業客戶的匯款單時，當時客戶填單要取款「1千萬元」，她的部屬黃姓專員拆寫成2張各「500萬元」的匯款委託單時，不小心寫錯變成「5000萬元」。她依內部流程複核時，卻沒發現客戶的取款憑條比取款金額少1個0，導致多匯給客戶9千萬。客戶隔天隨即退回溢領的金額，她自認沒造成公司形象和實質財務上的損失。
陳女還聲稱，公司為了要逼她離職，不但將她2013年度考績打成乙等，除了影響晉升還無法領到50萬元的年終獎金，因此提告請求撤銷懲處外，另請求50萬元的精神撫慰金。
對於陳女的控訴，台北富邦則認為，陳女當時的確並未確實複核客戶的匯款內容，導致出現溢匯9千萬的重大疏失，公司按照員工獎懲辦法進行懲處，實屬正當行使懲戒權而非刻意羞辱打壓。
法院一審時判決陳女敗訴，她不服上訴高院，但法官認為難以認定陳女遭到不當打壓或侮辱；另外溢匯一事，1億元和1千萬元的阿拉伯數字中有幾個「0」，對於行員而言是辨別的基礎能力，陳女作為資深主管，卻發生重大誤判，屬於不可原諒的重大疏失，她卻還稱說情節不嚴重，更推卸責任是「工作負荷過重」不應懲處，高院因此駁回上訴。
Wrong by a 0... Bank female vice governor 10 million to 100 million customers more than 90 million
TVBS News Network
Lin Baohong
August 27, 2018
A female bank assistant misreads the customer's remittance figures, causing the other party to overtake 90 million. (schematic / TVBS)
A female deputy, who is working at Taipei Fubon Bank, recently checked the customer's remittance information and accidentally misread the number and remitted 10 million yuan to 100 million yuan; 90 million remitted, but Chen is still being disciplined by the company, and the annual performance appraisal is scored as B. She refused to accept the punishment and confessed to being humiliated. She filed a claim of 1 million and rescinded the company. However, the judge considered that Chen was a senior supervisor. The identification of the deposit slip was the basic ability of the banker and therefore rejected the appeal.
Chen Nuo advocated that she was originally the assistant manager of Songnan Branch. She also performed very well. In 2010, she was transferred to Nangang Branch, but her performance appraisal was scored as A, and the year-end bonus was less than 250,000 yuan.
In addition, Chen also said that the Nangang branch had a large business volume. When she was processing a remittance slip for a corporate client in May 2013, the client had to withdraw the money by “10 million yuan”, and her subordinate Huang Xing commissioner broke into 2 When each of the "5 million yuan" remittance orders was made, it was accidentally written into "50 million yuan." When she reviewed the internal process, she did not find that the customer's withdrawal slip was one less than the withdrawal amount, resulting in more than 90 million remittances to the customer. The customer immediately returned the amount of the overdraft, and she did not believe that the company's image and substantial financial losses.
Chen also claimed that in order to force her to leave, the company not only changed her 2013 performance appraisal into B, but also could not receive the 500,000 yuan year-end bonus except for the promotion. Therefore, the request for revocation of punishment was also requested, and another request was 500,000 yuan. The spirit of soothing gold.
Regarding Chen’s complaint, Taipei Fubon believes that Chen did not actually review the client’s remittance content at the time, resulting in a major loss of 90 million overflows. The company’s punishment in accordance with employee rewards and punishments is a legitimate exercise of disciplinary power. Non-deliberate humiliation and suppression.
When the court ruled that the woman lost the case in the first instance, she refused to accept the appeal of the High Court, but the judge found it difficult to determine that the woman was improperly suppressed or insulted. In addition, there were several "100" in the Arabic figures of 100 million yuan and 10 million yuan. For the staff, it is the basic ability to distinguish. Chen, as a senior supervisor, has a major misjudgment and is a major injustice. She also said that the plot is not serious, and the responsibility is that the workload is too heavy. Punished, the High Court rejected the appeal.
More TVBS reports
Net exchange small fresh meat sweet shout "姊姊" Mature woman seasickness lost 10,000 yuan
Fraud! Women trapped in "Net Love Fans"
Hotline you and me! Call to guess who I am, the uncle was almost deceived 800,000
看錯1個0…銀行女副理匯1千萬變1億 客戶多領9千萬
TVBS新聞網
2.7k 人追蹤
林保宏
2018年8月27日 下午9:37
一名銀行女副理把客戶的匯款數字看錯，導致對方溢領9千萬。(示意圖／TVBS)
一名任職於台北富邦銀行的陳姓女副理，日前在複核客戶的匯款資料時，不小心看錯數字，把1千萬匯成1億元；隨然隔天客戶就把多出的9千萬匯回，但陳女仍遭公司懲戒，年度考績打成乙等。她不服處分並自認遭到羞辱，向公司提出求償100萬並撤銷懲處；但法官認為陳女是資深主管，分辨存提款單的數字是銀行員的基本能力，因此駁回上訴。
陳女主張，她本來是松南分行的副理，表現也十分良好，2010年調到南港分行，但考績卻被打成甲等，年終獎金少領了25萬元。
另外陳女還表示，南港分行業務量大，2013年5月她在處理一間企業客戶的匯款單時，當時客戶填單要取款「1千萬元」，她的部屬黃姓專員拆寫成2張各「500萬元」的匯款委託單時，不小心寫錯變成「5000萬元」。她依內部流程複核時，卻沒發現客戶的取款憑條比取款金額少1個0，導致多匯給客戶9千萬。客戶隔天隨即退回溢領的金額，她自認沒造成公司形象和實質財務上的損失。
陳女還聲稱，公司為了要逼她離職，不但將她2013年度考績打成乙等，除了影響晉升還無法領到50萬元的年終獎金，因此提告請求撤銷懲處外，另請求50萬元的精神撫慰金。
對於陳女的控訴，台北富邦則認為，陳女當時的確並未確實複核客戶的匯款內容，導致出現溢匯9千萬的重大疏失，公司按照員工獎懲辦法進行懲處，實屬正當行使懲戒權而非刻意羞辱打壓。
法院一審時判決陳女敗訴，她不服上訴高院，但法官認為難以認定陳女遭到不當打壓或侮辱；另外溢匯一事，1億元和1千萬元的阿拉伯數字中有幾個「0」，對於行員而言是辨別的基礎能力，陳女作為資深主管，卻發生重大誤判，屬於不可原諒的重大疏失，她卻還稱說情節不嚴重，更推卸責任是「工作負荷過重」不應懲處，高院因此駁回上訴。
Wrong by a 0... Bank female vice governor 10 million to 100 million customers more than 90 million
TVBS News Network
Lin Baohong
August 27, 2018
A female bank assistant misreads the customer's remittance figures, causing the other party to overtake 90 million. (schematic / TVBS)
A female deputy, who is working at Taipei Fubon Bank, recently checked the customer's remittance information and accidentally misread the number and remitted 10 million yuan to 100 million yuan; 90 million remitted, but Chen is still being disciplined by the company, and the annual performance appraisal is scored as B. She refused to accept the punishment and confessed to being humiliated. She filed a claim of 1 million and rescinded the company. However, the judge considered that Chen was a senior supervisor. The identification of the deposit slip was the basic ability of the banker and therefore rejected the appeal.
Chen Nuo advocated that she was originally the assistant manager of Songnan Branch. She also performed very well. In 2010, she was transferred to Nangang Branch, but her performance appraisal was scored as A, and the year-end bonus was less than 250,000 yuan.
In addition, Chen also said that the Nangang branch had a large business volume. When she was processing a remittance slip for a corporate client in May 2013, the client had to withdraw the money by “10 million yuan”, and her subordinate Huang Xing commissioner broke into 2 When each of the "5 million yuan" remittance orders was made, it was accidentally written into "50 million yuan." When she reviewed the internal process, she did not find that the customer's withdrawal slip was one less than the withdrawal amount, resulting in more than 90 million remittances to the customer. The customer immediately returned the amount of the overdraft, and she did not believe that the company's image and substantial financial losses.
Chen also claimed that in order to force her to leave, the company not only changed her 2013 performance appraisal into B, but also could not receive the 500,000 yuan year-end bonus except for the promotion. Therefore, the request for revocation of punishment was also requested, and another request was 500,000 yuan. The spirit of soothing gold.
Regarding Chen’s complaint, Taipei Fubon believes that Chen did not actually review the client’s remittance content at the time, resulting in a major loss of 90 million overflows. The company’s punishment in accordance with employee rewards and punishments is a legitimate exercise of disciplinary power. Non-deliberate humiliation and suppression.
When the court ruled that the woman lost the case in the first instance, she refused to accept the appeal of the High Court, but the judge found it difficult to determine that the woman was improperly suppressed or insulted. In addition, there were several "100" in the Arabic figures of 100 million yuan and 10 million yuan. For the staff, it is the basic ability to distinguish. Chen, as a senior supervisor, has a major misjudgment and is a major injustice. She also said that the plot is not serious, and the responsibility is that the workload is too heavy. Punished, the High Court rejected the appeal.
More TVBS reports
Net exchange small fresh meat sweet shout "姊姊" Mature woman seasickness lost 10,000 yuan
Fraud! Women trapped in "Net Love Fans"
Hotline you and me! Call to guess who I am, the uncle was almost deceived 800,000
