The picture that emerged was one not quite the story that I heard and read growing up. In a nutshell, the Professor's account was that the people of Singapore wanted Lim Chin Siong as their leader but the British would not allow it and wanted Lee Kuan Yew instead.
Dear Scroobal
One just can't accept the fact that LKY used the British , rode the left, screwed the left faster using the british than the left could screw him through Chin Peng and the STC. His view of history is a romantic notion of an idealized LCS betrayed by an evil LKY in cahoots with the brits and the Tunku.
Chin Peng in his memoirs did admit indirectly to being in direct command and control of some elements in Singapore. The elements he named were however those which were already known. Interestingly enough whilst he was willing to name the entire chain of command in the whole of Penninsula Malaysia he left out Singapore as a black hole. I can't for one momement belief militarily or politically that in playing for keeps he did not have substantial influence in the SG of that era.
Locke
Dear Porifio
The one's who are in parliament and who are old enough perhaps respect LKY excessively to tell him that he is irrelevant and a dinosaur. The one's out of parliament hate and seek to destroy him politically and character wise. Those younger one's like me just want to tell him to FO and tend the garden but that voice is not heard.
Locke
They are holding back thinking that he will kick the bucket and it has been a long wait. Not out of respect but the backlash by cadre members (many who were born with undetactable blinkers and are loyal to a fault).Locke,
No one in the present PAP top hierachy has the balls to tell LKY the real objective truth i.e. when to STFU.
Earlier than Eu, one notable Singaporean who was the Communist leader in Singapore was Wee Mon Cheng who was then known by the surname Hu. He subsequently became ambassdor to Japan. Life is indeed a mystery.
Anyway Zaid Zahari is certainly a communist.
The declassified documents at British record office show otherwise. Harry Lee did not ride the "united front tiger" as claimed by LKY's paid scribes. LKY was the "chosen one", confirmed by his British handlers, including a British senior special branch officer in Singapore.
The departing British colonialists made "politics" dirty for Lim Chin Siong, the true leader of the people of Singapore. Harry Lee would have been HIStory if not for the British and the Malay aristocracy headed by the Tunku.
No one is "fixated". History is the barometer to understand the present and how to move into the future with confidence. Only those who spread falsehood, try to paint history as irrelevant to both the present and future.
Scroobal,
This is certainly an interesting nugget if it is indeed true.
Btw do you know who was the Commie double agent who was murdered while working for Eu, recall reading about it somewhere but can't quite remember the facts at the moment.
As for Lim Chin Siong & gang, oldie medic Singaporeans tell me of a time when Drs. Lim Hock Siew and Poh Su Kai encouraged young medics and nurses to join the 'Rakyat' and sweep the streets of Singapore, which did not go down to well with alot of the young medics who were more interested in getting into the nurses knickers
Cheers
Dear Scroobal
One just can't accept the fact that LKY used the British , rode the left, screwed the left faster using the british than the left could screw him through Chin Peng and the STC. His view of history is a romantic notion of an idealized LCS betrayed by an evil LKY in cahoots with the brits and the Tunku.
Locke
You must be referring to Lai, who Chin Peng took over from. He was the previous CPM leader for both Malaysia and Singapore and he resided in Singapore. He was of vietnamese extract.
Good observation and well put. Unfortunately Kim San's nephew Pang did not get the second chance that others got after an election's defeat.In short, LKY appears to have screwed and used anyone who was of any political use to him even his own loyal PAP old guard, save for his own immediate family and maybe Lim Kim San and those who died before he had the opportunity to screw them.
But then again politics is a dirty dangerous business, not for the idealists and righteous moralists who only see things in black and white.
You are right. He worked with the Japanese as well and he stole the party funds.Lai Te was a triple agent who sold out both the MCP and the Brits. On the run after he was exposed, he met his deserving fate in the hands of red agents in Thailand.
Lai Te was a triple agent who sold out both the MCP and the Brits. On the run after he was exposed, he met his deserving fate in the hands of red agents in Thailand.
Hey thanks for the clarification, this is indeed the chap that I had in mind
Was Mao a "successful leader"?
[Now back to your question about a "successful leader who is/was an idealist" ... Was Mao a "successful leader"?
Yes, but only up to 1956.