Ong Ye Kung’s ‘rebuttal’ shows how jiak liow bee PAP is

[chittychitty]

I refer to “Ong Ye Kung to Louis Ng: Generalisations tar public service ‘with same brush’”. CNA

PAP MP Louis Ng had earlier said that there is “a general consensus that people will get into trouble if they speak up in the public service”. This is a fact which every Singaporean knows.

Even retired public servant like Ngiam Tong Dow was forced to clarify after he made these comments about PAP elites:

CNA: “Ong Ye Kung on Thursday (Mar 1) issued a sharp rebuttal to Member of Parliament Louis Ng’s comments…”

The joke is Ong’s “rebuttal” is merely a denial without any supporting evidence that the majority of civil servants do not fear speaking up.

Ong has not provided instances of public officers speaking their minds strongly without getting into trouble.

Instead, Singaporeans are expected to believe that “employee engagement surveys and systems in place which recognizes officers” have produced a culture of fearless public officers.

Continuing with his what-public-servants-should-do “rebuttal”, Ong encouraged public servants to “inform their permanent secretary or the head of civil service or even have a word with me” if their “immediate superior is not supportive”. But what will likely happen is the employee will subsequently be marked by the immediate superior and his career hentak kaki.

More at https://www.prolificcrap.com/forum/...ung-s-rebuttal-shows-how-jiak-liow-bee-pap-is

 

[bobby]

What's the problem?

Half of the civil servants are non Singaporeans anyway.

 

[po2wq]

... The joke is Ong’s “rebuttal” is merely a denial without any supporting evidence ...

wen dey tel ya there's no white horse, den it has 2 b there's no white horse ...

 

[steffychun]

same old PAP since 1965

 

[Pek Kim Lui]

wen dey tel ya there's no white horse, den it has 2 b there's no white horse ...

but got black sheep.

 

[bobby]

People almost forgot...this Ong bugger was voted out in Aljunied GRC in 2011 but managed to sneak in via Sembawang GRC in 2015.

A potential PM candidate?

 

[whoami]

People almost forgot...this Ong bugger was voted out in Aljunied GRC in 2011 but managed to sneak in via Sembawang GRC in 2015.

A potential PM candidate?

Same like tat Anal doctor too

 

[bobby]

Same like tat Anal doctor too

We all know that the GRC is a big fiasco and that's why we get this sort of MPs into parliament ridding air-con bus.

All thanks to Mah Bow Tan losing to Chiam See Tong.....

 

[halsey02]

wen dey tel ya there's no white horse, den it has 2 b there's no white horse ...

Of course there is no white horse, it was black in the first place...the 70% are not only colour blind, they are black & white blind also. They say, white is black..the 70% nod, yes sir!, black is white... the 70% nod, yes sir!

Only the 70% are bloody fools...you think the evil serpents..oops! civil servants, dare speak, what is true to the heart & true to every one hearts?

The Civil Servants living near me are all c$%$%$% suckers, you find them in the all the RC's like "brood of vipers".

 

[mojito]

I refer to “Ong Ye Kung to Louis Ng: Generalisations tar public service ‘with same brush’”. CNA

PAP MP Louis Ng had earlier said that there is “a general consensus that people will get into trouble if they speak up in the public service”. This is a fact which every Singaporean knows.

Even retired public servant like Ngiam Tong Dow was forced to clarify after he made these comments about PAP elites:

CNA: “Ong Ye Kung on Thursday (Mar 1) issued a sharp rebuttal to Member of Parliament Louis Ng’s comments…”

The joke is Ong’s “rebuttal” is merely a denial without any supporting evidence that the majority of civil servants do not fear speaking up.

Ong has not provided instances of public officers speaking their minds strongly without getting into trouble.

Instead, Singaporeans are expected to believe that “employee engagement surveys and systems in place which recognizes officers” have produced a culture of fearless public officers.

Continuing with his what-public-servants-should-do “rebuttal”, Ong encouraged public servants to “inform their permanent secretary or the head of civil service or even have a word with me” if their “immediate superior is not supportive”. But what will likely happen is the employee will subsequently be marked by the immediate superior and his career hentak kaki.

More at https://www.prolificcrap.com/forum/...ung-s-rebuttal-shows-how-jiak-liow-bee-pap-is

How to prove there is no God you tell me? Similarly it cannot be proven that civil servants dare not speak up. Louis Ng should apologize for making such baseless statements in court, err... parliament. Say sorry now!