CCS: I earn more more money than you ever could and dont need to serve NS.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Once again caption this!
- Thread starter steffychun
- Start date
CCS: I earn more more money than you ever could and dont need to serve NS.
"hello soldier, want to me salute you first is it?!"
CCS: Soldier, did you vote for the PAP the last GE?
Soldier: Yes, Sir! Can I suggest something to you, minister?
CCS: Bo tai chi but don't tell me to kee chiu ok?
Soldier: With your salary, can you afford a better looking belt? Hermes for example. Dunhill also can. Not one from the night market, sir.
CCS: Are you the "Pui Kia" from Sammyboy Coffee shop??
Soldiers : NO Sir but I am an active member of the other Sammyboy Forum!
Soldiers : NO Sir but I am an active member of the other Sammyboy Forum!
Last edited:
you do reservist i earn your tax!
Insight Down South<input id="content_0_tagimaGuid" class="tagimaGuid" name="content_0$tagimaGuid" value="{FC0ECB2E-2D92-43D0-AAFE-B07B069FBE0D}" type="hidden"> Published: Saturday September 14, 2013 MYT 12:00:00 AM
Updated: Saturday September 14, 2013 MYT 8:37:33 AM
[h=2]Concern over NS numbers[/h]By SEAH CHIANG NEE
<!--[Sharing Panel + Print + Text Increase Decrease 1]--><!--StoryReviewCommonSharingPanel-->
<input class="text-increase" title="Increase Text" type="button"><input class="text-decrease" title="Decrease Text" type="button"><input class="print" title="Print" type="button"><!--SocialSharingBox-->
<tbody>
</tbody>
<!--/SocialSharingBox-->
<style type="text/css"> #gigya-share-vertical { margin: 0px 10px 10px 10px; }</style>
<!--/StoryReviewCommonSharingPanel-->
By 2030, only about half of the population will be core Singaporeans. Most of the rest will be foreigners, who will not be required to enlist for national service.
WITH a bigger 6.9 million population, Singapore’s dilemma over a declining reservist army will be over by 2030, shouldn’t it?
Theoretically, the answer is yes. Surely you can’t have one of the world’s most over-crowded cities that impose military service for all 18-year-old boys running short of soldiers.
Well, this city can and probably will. In fact, the arrival of more new citizens or permanent residents will probably not throw up a larger “people’s army” but create a bigger headache to defence planners.
The reason? By 2030 only about half of the population will be core Singaporeans, most of the rest being foreigners will not be required to enlist.
National service, which began in 1967, requires young citizens to enlist for two years and thereafter serve in the reservist army – going back for a brief in-camp training every year. (Since then, it has trained more than 300,000 reservists, who will become front-line soldiers in the event of a war.)
For many years now, this concept was badly affected by a falling birthrate and a high number of Singaporeans emigrating overseas.
In fact, each consecutive batch of recruits has got smaller.
For example, the first batch 45 years ago numbered 55,000 conscripts, but nowadays, the annual figure is close to around 27,000 – only half what it used to be.
This would include a few children of PRs and new citizens. But it’s more than just a numbers problem.
Few small and medium-size firms (which employ 60% of all workers) would want their employees to report for 10-20 days of in-camp training annually.
To avoid this, some managers are hiring foreigners who have no such duty. Particularly guilty are foreign bosses who do not see any usefulness of military training to their profits.
Recently a government White Paper was passed in Parliament which approved the admission of more migrants to push for a 6.9 million population.
The trouble is that the vast majority of some 553,000 PRs are here to make money and will eventually leave. Unlike citizens, PRs do not have to enlist, but their children do.
Most parents, however, try various means to prevent their sons from becoming reservists.
The annual reservist recalled has for years placed Singaporean workers in a disadvantaged position when competing against women and foreigners, who are free from military service.
In response to local complaints, the Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen announced in March the setting up of a special committee to try to improve the lives and careers of NS-men and their families.
It will discuss how to better reward those who have fulfilled their NS liabilities and increase support from various groups like families, employers, schools, PRs and new citizens.
Why would a vastly expanded population not significantly enlarge the reservist army?
A reason is that by 2030, the anticipated 6.9 million population will have greatly diluted the Singaporean core to just about half.
The other half will be foreigners who have not undergone national service. With Singaporeans bearing an uneven brunt of the defence duty, the crucial question is: “Will the reservist army defend a Singapore in which half the population are from abroad?”
It is hard to imagine how the government in 2030 can convince core Singaporeans to risk their lives to protect the newcomers, who actually compete against them for jobs?
It will severely test the resolve of our NS-men or even the workability of the concept of a citizens’ defence force. So far, most Singaporeans have grudgingly accepted NS with some grumblings against foreigners here and there. The majority just soldier on.
Singaporeans have articulated for a review of NS training or a reduction of the service period but few have called for an end to it, realising its importance.
Last year, nearly 70% of Singaporeans polled by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) said that having a male child who had completed NS is an important characteristic of being ‘Singaporean’.
While he was in power, the founding leader Lee Kuan Yew, was conscious about factors that motivated NS-men to defend Singapore.
He concluded that owning a Housing Board flat was a crucial consideration. His rationale was that Singaporeans had to feel they were defending their own homes and families, not just fight to defend “Orchard Road (tourists) or Shenton Way (financial district)”.
Two months ago in an online discussion whether NS-men would defend a Singapore dominated by foreigners, a reservist soldier wrote a response online addressed “to rich foreigners living in Singapore”.
He said that outsiders were all impressed by what Singapore has to offer to wealthy foreigners.
These included safe streets, low crime and a safe environment to bring up a family and freedom to live a lavish lifestyle, he said.
“This security that you enjoy is not free and does not come easily.Singapore does not have a highly paid professional army.
“It is largely made up of part-time conscripts of ordinary Singaporean men. Hundreds of thousands of ordinary Singaporean men like myself shed blood, sweat and tears. Some have even lost their lives just to provide this security.”
“Will Singaporean NS-men like myself lay my life on the line to protect foreigners here? I’m afraid that’s a BIG NO! Why should we? Sorry but you and your family are on your own!I will only fight to protect my fellow Singaporeans. No more no less,” he said.
There is no indication that his views reflect those of the general body of reservists, but it is nevertheless disturbing.
It makes the defence minister’s forthcoming committee deliberations very important.
> The views expressed are entirely the writer’s own.
Updated: Saturday September 14, 2013 MYT 8:37:33 AM
[h=2]Concern over NS numbers[/h]By SEAH CHIANG NEE
<!--[Sharing Panel + Print + Text Increase Decrease 1]--><!--StoryReviewCommonSharingPanel-->
<input class="text-increase" title="Increase Text" type="button"><input class="text-decrease" title="Decrease Text" type="button"><input class="print" title="Print" type="button"><!--SocialSharingBox-->
<tbody> </tbody> | <iframe style="margin: 0px; left: 0px; top: 0px; width: 87px; height: 20px; visibility: visible; position: static;" id="I0_1379185770583" title="+Share" tabIndex="0" vspace="0" marginHeight="0" src="https://apis.google.com/_/+1/sharebutton?plusShare=true&bsv=o&width=&height=&annotation=bubble&action=share&hl=en&origin=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thestar.com.my&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thestar.com.my%2FOpinion%2FColumnists%2FInsight-Down-South%2FProfile%2FArticles%2F2013%2F09%2F14%2FConcern-over-NS-numbers.aspx&gsrc=3p&jsh=m%3B%2F_%2Fscs%2Fapps-static%2F_%2Fjs%2Fk%3Doz.gapi.en.kUo-aHM7lU0.O%2Fm%3D__features__%2Fam%3DAQ%2Frt%3Dj%2Fd%3D1%2Frs%3DAItRSTP1_dAOlIR2gqx5HMrgIB_Gx4xmjg#_methods=onPlusOne%2C_ready%2C_close%2C_open%2C_resizeMe%2C_renderstart%2Concircled%2Cdrefresh%2Cerefresh%2Conauth%2Conendinteraction%2Conload&id=I0_1379185770583&parent=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thestar.com.my&pfname=&rpctoken=13370089" frameBorder="0" allowTransparency="true" name="I0_1379185770583" marginWidth="0" scrolling="no" hspace="0" data-gapiattached="true"></iframe> |
<tbody> </tbody> | <iframe style="width: 107px; height: 20px;" class="twitter-share-button twitter-count-horizontal" title="Twitter Tweet Button" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.1379006964.html#_=1379185770365&count=horizontal&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thestar.com.my%2FOpinion%2FColumnists%2FInsight-Down-South%2FProfile%2FArticles%2F2013%2F09%2F14%2FConcern-over-NS-numbers.aspx&size=m&text=Concern%20over%20NS%20numbers&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thestar.com.my%2FOpinion%2FColumnists%2FInsight-Down-South%2FProfile%2FArticles%2F2013%2F09%2F14%2FConcern-over-NS-numbers.aspx" frameBorder="0" allowTransparency="true" scrolling="no" data-twttr-rendered="true"></iframe> |
<tbody>
</tbody>
<!--/SocialSharingBox-->
<style type="text/css"> #gigya-share-vertical { margin: 0px 10px 10px 10px; }</style>
<!--/StoryReviewCommonSharingPanel-->
By 2030, only about half of the population will be core Singaporeans. Most of the rest will be foreigners, who will not be required to enlist for national service.
WITH a bigger 6.9 million population, Singapore’s dilemma over a declining reservist army will be over by 2030, shouldn’t it?
Theoretically, the answer is yes. Surely you can’t have one of the world’s most over-crowded cities that impose military service for all 18-year-old boys running short of soldiers.
Well, this city can and probably will. In fact, the arrival of more new citizens or permanent residents will probably not throw up a larger “people’s army” but create a bigger headache to defence planners.
The reason? By 2030 only about half of the population will be core Singaporeans, most of the rest being foreigners will not be required to enlist.
National service, which began in 1967, requires young citizens to enlist for two years and thereafter serve in the reservist army – going back for a brief in-camp training every year. (Since then, it has trained more than 300,000 reservists, who will become front-line soldiers in the event of a war.)
For many years now, this concept was badly affected by a falling birthrate and a high number of Singaporeans emigrating overseas.
In fact, each consecutive batch of recruits has got smaller.
For example, the first batch 45 years ago numbered 55,000 conscripts, but nowadays, the annual figure is close to around 27,000 – only half what it used to be.
This would include a few children of PRs and new citizens. But it’s more than just a numbers problem.
Few small and medium-size firms (which employ 60% of all workers) would want their employees to report for 10-20 days of in-camp training annually.
To avoid this, some managers are hiring foreigners who have no such duty. Particularly guilty are foreign bosses who do not see any usefulness of military training to their profits.
Recently a government White Paper was passed in Parliament which approved the admission of more migrants to push for a 6.9 million population.
The trouble is that the vast majority of some 553,000 PRs are here to make money and will eventually leave. Unlike citizens, PRs do not have to enlist, but their children do.
Most parents, however, try various means to prevent their sons from becoming reservists.
The annual reservist recalled has for years placed Singaporean workers in a disadvantaged position when competing against women and foreigners, who are free from military service.
In response to local complaints, the Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen announced in March the setting up of a special committee to try to improve the lives and careers of NS-men and their families.
It will discuss how to better reward those who have fulfilled their NS liabilities and increase support from various groups like families, employers, schools, PRs and new citizens.
Why would a vastly expanded population not significantly enlarge the reservist army?
A reason is that by 2030, the anticipated 6.9 million population will have greatly diluted the Singaporean core to just about half.
The other half will be foreigners who have not undergone national service. With Singaporeans bearing an uneven brunt of the defence duty, the crucial question is: “Will the reservist army defend a Singapore in which half the population are from abroad?”
It is hard to imagine how the government in 2030 can convince core Singaporeans to risk their lives to protect the newcomers, who actually compete against them for jobs?
It will severely test the resolve of our NS-men or even the workability of the concept of a citizens’ defence force. So far, most Singaporeans have grudgingly accepted NS with some grumblings against foreigners here and there. The majority just soldier on.
Singaporeans have articulated for a review of NS training or a reduction of the service period but few have called for an end to it, realising its importance.
Last year, nearly 70% of Singaporeans polled by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) said that having a male child who had completed NS is an important characteristic of being ‘Singaporean’.
While he was in power, the founding leader Lee Kuan Yew, was conscious about factors that motivated NS-men to defend Singapore.
He concluded that owning a Housing Board flat was a crucial consideration. His rationale was that Singaporeans had to feel they were defending their own homes and families, not just fight to defend “Orchard Road (tourists) or Shenton Way (financial district)”.
Two months ago in an online discussion whether NS-men would defend a Singapore dominated by foreigners, a reservist soldier wrote a response online addressed “to rich foreigners living in Singapore”.
He said that outsiders were all impressed by what Singapore has to offer to wealthy foreigners.
These included safe streets, low crime and a safe environment to bring up a family and freedom to live a lavish lifestyle, he said.
“This security that you enjoy is not free and does not come easily.Singapore does not have a highly paid professional army.
“It is largely made up of part-time conscripts of ordinary Singaporean men. Hundreds of thousands of ordinary Singaporean men like myself shed blood, sweat and tears. Some have even lost their lives just to provide this security.”
“Will Singaporean NS-men like myself lay my life on the line to protect foreigners here? I’m afraid that’s a BIG NO! Why should we? Sorry but you and your family are on your own!I will only fight to protect my fellow Singaporeans. No more no less,” he said.
There is no indication that his views reflect those of the general body of reservists, but it is nevertheless disturbing.
It makes the defence minister’s forthcoming committee deliberations very important.
> The views expressed are entirely the writer’s own.
that is why you should kick out the PAP
Similar threads
