Re: Lesson Learnt from Columbarium Fiasco - NEVER AGAIN 1-Party Rule!
"The officers assessing the tender just assumed that it must be a company affiliated to some religious organisation and, because they made the highest bid, it was awarded to them."
Dear Mr Khaw, the people in your ministry ASSUME things? My primary school teacher told me that when we assume, we make an ASS of U and Me!
He also drew the distinction between the operation of a commercial columbarium and an "incidental columbarium", which is a service provided by religious organisations.
Dear Mr Khaw, stop all this nuancing and playing with words, semantics etc. Your ministry farked it up as usual, and now blame all sorts of things; why you you blame the haze for your cock-talk too?
He said the ministry will ensure the land is restored to the original plan for a Chinese temple, and that it is in discussion with Eternal Pure Land on how that can be achieved.
Dear Mr Khaw, my interpretation is that you are going back on your words, never mind what you said in parliament? And change your mind after the elections, like the lies you told about means testing for hospital charges BEFORE and AFTER the elections?
"Having reached such a situation, I'll find a way to try to unwind this. The key point is for that Sengkang site, we want the Chinese temple and we will deliver that, for that Sengkang site we do not want a commercial columbarium and we won't have one."
Dear Mr Khaw, I am impressed by your 'strong' words - if only I can trust you, the way I trust you on your $8 heart operation!