Re: M Ravi: Law minister understanding of HK basic law is seriously flawed
Typical Sinkie talking through his nose again!
I have lost interest in point by point rebuttals oredi, but let me do it now just for the fun of it!
The protest is a cover up for independence. A section of Hongkies think like the tail wagging the dog. Make no mistake. China cannot be intimidated. As long as Hong Kong is not a sovereign country, it has no say on what political system it likes. It's parent is China. Hong Kong could well be just a province.
The part in bold is total bullshit. It treats as non-existent, the Sino-British Declaration, which is a treaty between two sovereign nations and the Basic Law is part of that agreement. China may say that she doesn't want to honour the Treaty of Nanking because it was signed at gunpoint, but nobody forced her to sign the Sino-British Declaration or to declare that it will be "one country, two systems" for at least fifty years after the handover. The China of 1982, year in which the Declaration was signed, recovering from the effects of the Cultural Revolution, still very poor and backward both economically and militarily, agreed to those terms for pragmatic reasons. Whatever her reasons, she has to honour those terms and that means universal suffrage which is specifically stated in the Basic Law - true and not fake.
If it continues to push its agenda of universal suffrage, it has to wait. China will catch up to it in its time. To do so now is stupid and henceforth, this is not a protest. It is a rebellion. But rebel for what purpose? Hong Kong can never be self-sufficient. U.K and its British empire is history. USA will be non-existent in 50 years time. Don't be an idiot to democracy. True democracy means no government, but it is only a bloody concept. In real life, there can be no true democacy.
Again, the part in bold is TOTAL BULLSHIT. Watch this video and learn the difference.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFXuGIpsdE0
No government is NOT democracy, it is ANARCHY. It is not a form of government, but a means to an end, a tool for troublemakers to get what they want. All modern democracies are what is called REPRESENTATIVE democracy and not direct democracy. That is why not any Tom, Dick or Ah Kow can make a speech in Parliament.
USA will certainly be around in 50 years, China as a single entity is not so certain, after all most Chinese regard it as a civilisation rather than a country. USA does not have any separatist elements, China has many - Xinjiang, Tibet, etc. China has been broken up before many times in its history. In fact that is the typical situation between dynasties. The USA only had ONE civil war, China had countless civil wars and rebellions.
Patience is not always a virtue, in some situations it is a sin. Affluence does not automatically guarantee that democracy will emerge nor what adulterated form will be adopted. It never ceases to amaze me how CCP documents and essays always claim the party to be democratic. The Democratic Republic of Korea (North Korea) is democratic? The People's Republic of China answers to the people?
Of course Hong Kong cannot be self-sufficient. Neither can Singapore. In fact many small countries are in the same condition, but that is no excuse for being spineless. Even large countries like China will suffer a lot of pain if they try to isolate themselves from the global economy.
You think China will allow Hong Kong to have a total free hand in choosing its Chief Executive, when its own CCCP politburo does not run this way? Fat hope lah.
Hello have you been following the news? NOBODY is asking for total free hand in choosing the CE. What the CCP has insisted is CE candidates be limited to TWO and each must have the backing of at least half of a nominating committee of 1,200 dominated by CCP cronies. That is what the Hongkies are rejecting since only Beijing sanctioned candidates will be able to get the votes of at least 600 of these fat cats. They want an alternative method and several have been proposed. They are angered by the fact that the report submitted by the HK government to Beijing claimed that a majority of Hongkies support Beijing's proposal and glaringly omitted to mention that 800,000 people participated in the civil referendum and expressed their preference for civil nomination and not nomination by a committee stuffed with Beijing loyalists. It's like Ass Loon holding a fake National CONversation and then claiming that the majority of Sinkies want the island to infested with more FTs. Sinkies can take these sort of LIES and continue to vote for these sort of LIARS as long as they have char kway teow for $3 but Hongkies and many other peoples of this world cannot - THAT IS THE BOTTOM LINE.