A Deeper Dive into 5Gs Various Health Concerns
https://5gradiation.net/
Over the past couple of years, more and more data has started to suggest that 5G radiation is a source of concern when it comes to long-term human health. For example, there currently exist more than five hundred published research articles that clearly showcase a link between 5G-based RFR exposure and human cellular damage. In fact, a group of 240 scientists who recently went through these studies found the results put forth by these papers to be quite alarming (i.e. the health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMFs)) so much so that they ended up signing a collective appeal (International EMF Scientist Appeal) calling for stricter exposure laws.
In their appeal, the scientists clearly mentioned that that constant exposure to 5G radiation can increase the risk of cancer, cellular stress, genetic damage in living organisms. Not only that, some of the other concerns put forth by the committee in relation to this technology include:
–It can potentially change the structural and functional capacity of the human reproductive system.
–It can result in various learning and memory deficits.
–Force the onset of various neurological disorders
–Adversely impact the general well-being of humans.
If that wasn’t enough, the studies go on to show that the potential damage could extend well beyond just humans, since 5G also has the capability to negatively impact plants as well as animals.
Also, it bears mentioning that the aforementioned group of scientists is not composed of some crazy radicals but rather individuals who have collectively published a whopping 2,000+ papers on EMF radiation in professional journals. And while the group is not seeking to get a ban on 5G tech, they are contending that the FCC (as well as other similar organizations) needs to adjust its current exposure limits — especially when there is so much scientific evidence to support the notion that 5G can have a negative impact on human life.
Another group called ‘5G Appeal’ too has been working towards a similar goal. The group (which consists of 250 scientists and medical doctors) has been asking authorities to stop the deployment of 5G as well as demanding more research towards the safety of 5G.
Despite all the evidence put forth by the above-mentioned groups, the FCC has failed to update its existing radiation limits even though Germany’s ICNIRP has taken the latest data into consideration and adjusted their safety limits based on this new research. Not only that, even the WHO has recognized the potential dangers of RFR and labeled it as a “possible carcinogenic agent for humans”. Last but not least, a study from the United States National Toxicology Program (NTP) has clearly shown that two years of continuous exposure to cell phone RFR resulted in a substantial increase in cancer-related issues in male rats and damaged DNA in rats and mice of both sexes.
