• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious No One's MP Oppie Leong Whines On FB That General Tan Don't Let Him Ask Questions In Parliament! What A Whining Asshole!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
1646659455223.png



SINGAPORE: Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin reminded Members of Parliament on Monday (Mar 7) of how proceedings are conducted, after a Non-constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) posted on Facebook that the "the Speaker didn’t even give me the chance" to speak in the House.

NCMP Leong Mun Wai (PSP) said in a comment on his Facebook page: "Now I’m at the budget debate for the Ministry of Manpower. Following from Minister Tan See Leng’s ... 'red herring' comments last Friday, I have a number of clarifications to make. But the Speaker didn’t even give me the chance. I will show you the video later when the volunteer has done it for me."

He added below: "Completely ridiculous!"


Mr Leong was referring to an earlier exchange at the end of the Ministry of Manpower's (MOM) Committee of Supply (COS) debate on Monday when he requested to ask more questions but was told by the Speaker that the time was up.

COS debates are when the House considers each ministry’s request for funds and votes on it.

After clarifications from a number of MPs on MOM's COS speeches, Mr Tan asked Mr Desmond Choo (PAP - Tampines) to make concluding remarks.

Mr Leong interjected, and said: "Chairman, point of order, chairman, I would still like to ask questions."

Mr Tan said: "Time's up. Mr Desmond Choo, please proceed."

But Mr Leong persisted and said: "Chairman, I said there are still questions. The debate is not over when there are still questions."

To which, Mr Tan replied: "Mr Leong, we are moving on."


Shortly after this exchange, Mr Leong posted the comments on Facebook.

Parliament proceeded to the Ministry of Education's COS debate, after which Mr Tan made his statement.

He pointed out to MPs that there are allotted times for proceedings in Parliament, and that there may not be time for all the questions and clarifications from members.

"I'm sure members understand how the process works. I'm not here to speculate the intent and purpose of various member's postings, but I thought it was opportune for me to refresh everyone's memories about how this ought to work, and why," said Mr Tan.

He explained that of the time given for each ministry's COS session, 40 per cent is for "cuts", usually a symbolic S$100 off the ministry's budget that MPs use to raise their concerns about the ministry's plans and programmes.

Mr Tan said that 50 per cent of the time would comprise response time from the ministries and 10 per cent of the time is allocated for clarifications from MPs.

The times for each COS session is sent out before the Parliament sitting, and the time when each ministry's debate is supposed to end is called the "guillotine time".

He explained that of the time given for each ministry's COS session, 40 per cent is for "cuts", usually a symbolic S$100 off the ministry's budget that MPs use to raise their concerns about the ministry's plans and programmes.

Mr Tan said that 50 per cent of the time would comprise response time from the ministries and 10 per cent of the time is allocated for clarifications from MPs.

The times for each COS session is sent out before the Parliament sitting, and the time when each ministry's debate is supposed to end is called the "guillotine time".


The Speaker said that the debate on the respective ministries will end once the guillotine times are reached, so that Parliament can proceed with other business, and members can file a parliamentary question if they have more queries for the ministry.

He said: "I know many of you would like to ask clarifications and we're not always able to accommodate them and many of you text me grumbling about why, how come you've got an important question to ask, but you can't ask. I hope that you bear with me for that."

He also explained that when the time for clarifications has ended, the chairman can extend the debate to the guillotine time at his discretion, which is what happened with the MOM debate.

He also clarified that he tries to give different MPs from various parties opportunities to speak. Listing all the MPs who raised clarifications during MOM's COS, he pointed out that Mr Leong was not the only one who did not get to say his piece before the guillotine time.

Other MPs, including Mr Edward Chia (PAP - Holland-Bukit Timah), Mr Melvin Yong (PAP - Radin Mas) and Mr Leon Perera (WP - Aljunied), as well as NMP Ms Janet Ang, also did not get to ask their questions.

Mr Tan added: "I thought as a matter of record it would be useful to just state this. I would not pretend nor do I wish to speculate as to why comments are made, but I thought this might be useful to remind all members of how the process works."
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/sin...huan-jin-leong-mun-wai-debate-cos-mom-2544836
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
View attachment 136744

SINGAPORE: Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin reminded Members of Parliament on Monday (Mar 7) of how proceedings are conducted, after a Non-constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) posted on Facebook that the "the Speaker didn’t even give me the chance" to speak in the House.

NCMP Leong Mun Wai (PSP) said in a comment on his Facebook page: "Now I’m at the budget debate for the Ministry of Manpower. Following from Minister Tan See Leng’s ... 'red herring' comments last Friday, I have a number of clarifications to make. But the Speaker didn’t even give me the chance. I will show you the video later when the volunteer has done it for me."

He added below: "Completely ridiculous!"

Mr Leong was referring to an earlier exchange at the end of the Ministry of Manpower's (MOM) Committee of Supply (COS) debate on Monday when he requested to ask more questions but was told by the Speaker that the time was up.

COS debates are when the House considers each ministry’s request for funds and votes on it.

After clarifications from a number of MPs on MOM's COS speeches, Mr Tan asked Mr Desmond Choo (PAP - Tampines) to make concluding remarks.

Mr Leong interjected, and said: "Chairman, point of order, chairman, I would still like to ask questions."

Mr Tan said: "Time's up. Mr Desmond Choo, please proceed."

But Mr Leong persisted and said: "Chairman, I said there are still questions. The debate is not over when there are still questions."

To which, Mr Tan replied: "Mr Leong, we are moving on."

Shortly after this exchange, Mr Leong posted the comments on Facebook.

Parliament proceeded to the Ministry of Education's COS debate, after which Mr Tan made his statement.

He pointed out to MPs that there are allotted times for proceedings in Parliament, and that there may not be time for all the questions and clarifications from members.

"I'm sure members understand how the process works. I'm not here to speculate the intent and purpose of various member's postings, but I thought it was opportune for me to refresh everyone's memories about how this ought to work, and why," said Mr Tan.

He explained that of the time given for each ministry's COS session, 40 per cent is for "cuts", usually a symbolic S$100 off the ministry's budget that MPs use to raise their concerns about the ministry's plans and programmes.

Mr Tan said that 50 per cent of the time would comprise response time from the ministries and 10 per cent of the time is allocated for clarifications from MPs.

The times for each COS session is sent out before the Parliament sitting, and the time when each ministry's debate is supposed to end is called the "guillotine time".

He explained that of the time given for each ministry's COS session, 40 per cent is for "cuts", usually a symbolic S$100 off the ministry's budget that MPs use to raise their concerns about the ministry's plans and programmes.

Mr Tan said that 50 per cent of the time would comprise response time from the ministries and 10 per cent of the time is allocated for clarifications from MPs.

The times for each COS session is sent out before the Parliament sitting, and the time when each ministry's debate is supposed to end is called the "guillotine time".

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/sin...huan-jin-leong-mun-wai-debate-cos-mom-2544836

TCJ = Tangy Cunt Juice :biggrin:
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Oppie Leong apologises for defaming General Chuan-Jin! Majulah PAP!


1646747810123.png


SINGAPORE: Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Leong Mun Wai (PSP) apologised on Tuesday (Mar 8) evening for a post and comments on Facebook accusing the Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin of not letting him speak in Parliament.

Mr Leong has also taken down the post and comments, complying with a request from Deputy Leader of the House Zaqy Mohamad.

At the close of the Parliament sitting on Tuesday, Mr Leong made a personal explanation as to why he put up the comments and post on Facebook.

He said that during the Manpower Ministry's Committee of Supply debate, he had hoped to ask Manpower Minister Tan See Leng "a very important point" about the "displacement of Singaporean PMETs (professionals, managers, executives, and technicians)".

"It was not my intent to impugn the Speaker or the parliamentary processes but in my social media post I was trying to highlight that some amount of discretion and flexibility with the standing orders will go a long way in enhancing our discussion in this House," he said.

He apologised, saying: "But today, I would like to sincerely and unreservedly apologise to the Speaker and this House for my Facebook comments of 12.52pm and 12.53pm on Mar 7, 2022, and the video I posted at 6.55pm on Mar 7, 2022, and the statements therein which impugn the Speaker and the processes of the Parliament."

Mr Leong added that he took the post down at 5.30pm on Tuesday, withdrew what he said in them, and undertook "not to repeat such words".

"I acknowledge that I did not set out all the facts in my post and thus gave a misleading impression," he said.

He also confirmed that he would post the apology on Facebook.

After the apology, Mr Zaqy said that Parliament has developed a set of procedures and practices to guide MPs on debating important issues that affect Singapore and Singaporeans "in an effective and efficient manner".

He highlighted that in other jurisdictions, there are examples where such procedural rules are used to prevent or frustrate the government of the day from carrying out its proper functions.

"It would be completely contrary to our interests for this to occur in this House. The rules have been designed and finetuned over the years and have worked in ensuring that important issues to us are brought up before the House and robustly debated, or allowing business to be completed without undue delay," he said.

Mr Zaqy added that more than 600 "cuts" - a symbolic way for MPs to raise their concerns about a ministry's plans and programmes - were filed at this year's Committee of Supply debates.

"We're looking at more than 50 hours of debate. So I don't think anyone can reasonably say that the Budget was not extensively debated. There are also avenues for issues to be raised in subsequent sittings," he said.

"I therefore hope that members would bear this in mind and remember that we are all representatives of this House, and we should resist any attempt to lower the standing or dignity of this House."

He added that all MPs "play a part in ensuring that robust debate" can take place in Parliament and that it "remains a trusted and respected institution".

He concluded by saying that he accepted Mr Leong's apology.

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/sin...rry-parliament-cos-debate-budget-2022-2548851
 
Top