No news on Jason Neo case after more than 3 years

[Confuseous]

In 2011, a Young People’s Action Party (YPAP) member, Jason Neo, had posted a religiously and racially offensive caption to a photo which he uploaded on his Facebook page.

The posting showed a photo he had taken of a school bus with Malay children from Huda Kindergarten, in Woodlands, dressed in their uniform which includes traditional Malay headwear.

Yesterday (30 Mar 2015), TRE managed to contact Mr Abdul and asked if he had been contacted by the police over the case, since then. Mr Abdul told TRE that since the last letter he received from the police in Jan 2012, he has heard nothing. That is, more than 3 years have past and nothing is heard on the outcome of the investigation on Jason Neo.

Mr Abdul added that had an opposition member been involved, he is sure that the police would have acted “quickly and efficiently”.
Meanwhile, Amos Yee, a 17-year-old Singaporean who had posted a YouTube video criticising the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew, was arrested on 29 Mar (‘17-year-old Amos Yee arrested‘). In the video, he also made insensitive remarks about Christianity.

The 8-minute video, which went viral, was called: “Lee Kuan Yew Is Finally Dead!”. It was posted on Friday (27 Mar) and had been viewed more than 680,000 times.

At least 20 police reports have been lodged against Amos Yee since he posted the video on YouTube.

It remained to be seen how the police will be treating Amos Yee case.

http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/03/31/no-news-on-jason-neo-case-after-more-than-3-years/

 

[Faker]

His insult is many time worst than Amos.

 

[csi88]

Let's see whether the government will carry out our late Mr Lee style of governing.No cover up a clean n anti corruption government.Lets see what the police reply is pertaining to Jason's incident.

 

[winnipegjets]

There are lots of foreigners who have 'harrassed' sinkees with their offensive posts. Our government couldn't be bothered about it, thus sending the message that sinkees should be insulted and be subservient to foreigners.

Damn the PAP.

It is a matter of time before ordinary sinkees will treat the poodles as dogs and spit on them.

 

[Faker]

When Islam is insulted, section 298 is applied.
When Christianity is mildly insulted in a 8min video section 298 is applied.

But...

When taoism is insulted and run down, verbal warning only!
When buddiism is insulted and run down, verbal warning only!
When hinduism is insulted and run down, verbal warning only!

What is the authority made up of ?

 

[makapaaa]

Police queried on 4-year old case

http://sgfuck.org/mybb/Thread-Police-queried-on-4-year-old-case?pid=1037161#pid1037161
[TABLE="class: tborder, width: 0"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]Today 12:48 PM[/TD]
[TD] http://sgfuck.org/mybb/images/mobile/posted_0.gif Post: #1
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: trow1, align: center"] forum456 http://sgfuck.org/mybb/images/buddy_offline.gif
Senior Member

Posts: 1,784
Reputation: 5 [/TD]
[TD="class: trow1 td_postbody_classic"][TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD] the online citizen

http://www.***banned***.com/2015/03/police-queried-on-4-year-old-case-involving-ex-ypap-member/

A member of the public has posted a query with the Singapore Police Force (SPF) over a four-year old incident involving a former Young PAP (YPAP) member.

Mr Paul Chen, posting on the SPF’s Facebook page on Tuesday, was referring to the incident involving then YPAP member, Jason Neo, in 2011.

Mr Neo had posted online a photo he had taken of a school bus with Malay children from Huda Kindergarten, in Woodlands. The children were dressed in their uniform which includes traditional Malay headwear.

Mr Neo captioned the photo: “Bus filled with young terrorist trainees?”

His post went viral and caused a huge uproar of protests from many Singaporeans and members of the public.

Two PAP Members of Parliament who were also YPAP leaders had to later tender their apologies personally to the school.

Under public pressure, Mr Neo later resigned from the YPAP altogether.

He had also issued an “unreserved apology” to the Muslim community.

At least three police reports were made against Mr Neo then, and the police were reported to be investigating the incident.

However, as Mr Chen pointed out, it has been four years since and no updates from the authorities on the investigations seem to have been provided.

Mr Chen’s query with the SPF compared Mr Neo’s case with that of the more recent one involving 16-year old Amos Yee, who was charged on Tuesday for a video criticising Christianity and ridiculing former Singapore Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew.

“I would like to applaud SPF for the swift action against Amos Yee who made insensitive remarks against the religious in his youtube video which he posted some days ago,” Mr Yee told the police. “I understood that one of the charges he faced is section 298 of penal code…”

“I do understand the rationale behind this charge,” Mr Chen said. “However, there is another case which happened more than 3 years ago which involved a former YPAP member who made a racist remark on Muslim kids. I am sure his remarks hurt a lot of Muslim feelings. A few police reports were made against Jason Neo the person who made the remarks but as of now, there is no feed back from the I/O.”

He was referring to the police officer in charge of the Neo case.

“My question is, how come the time taken by the SPF to take action against these two persons [Yee and Neo] is so much different considering both of them committed the same crime under section 298 penal code (if i understand the penal code correctly)?”

Mr Chen concluded:

“I believe in the professionalism of SPF in carry out their duties fairly and equally regardless of who committed the crime. Looking forward to your reply soon.”

You can read his post on the SPF Facebook page here.

“If Amos Yee is being charged under section 298 penal code, then I am sure all the more Jason Neo should be charged under this code too,” Mr Chen told The Online Citizen (TOC).

“Jason Neo racist remarks are worse than what Amos has said.”
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

 

[Faker]

To SPF: Amos Yee is charged! What about the case of YPAP’s Jason Neo?

Report from TR EMERITUS....
http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/04/01/to-spf-what-about-the-case-on-ypap-jason-neo/

Dear Sir,

I would like to applaud SPF for the swift action against Amos Yee who made insensitive remarks against the religious in his YouTube video which he posted some days ago. I understood that one of the charges he faced is section 298 of penal code which stated

“Whoever, with deliberate intention of wounding the religious or racial feelings of any person, utters any word or makes any sound in the hearing of that person, or makes any gesture in the sight of that person, or places any object in the sight of that person, or causes any matter however represented to be seen or heard by that person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 3 years, or with fine, or with both.”

I do understand the rational behind this charge. However, there is another case which happened more than 3 years ago which involved a former YPAP member who made a racist remark on Muslim kids. I am sure his remarks hurts a lot of Muslim feelings. A few police reports were made against Jason Neo the person who made the remarks but as of now, there is no feed back from the I/O.

My question is, how come the time taken by the SPF to take action against these two person is so much different considering both of them committed the same crime under section 298 penal code (if i understand the penal code correctly)?

I believe in the professionalism of SPF in carry out their duties fairly and equally regardless of who committed the crime. Looking forward to your reply soon.

Thanks a lot.

Paul Chan

 

[Leongsam]

Re: To SPF: Amos Yee is charged! What about the case of YPAP’s Jason Neo?

This proves how important it is to be in the good books of the PAP.

That's why I always say publicly that the PAP is the best even though I might actually think otherwise.

 

[KuanTi01]

Re: To SPF: Amos Yee is charged! What about the case of YPAP’s Jason Neo?

This proves how important it is to be in the good books of the PAP.

That's why I always say publicly that the PAP is the best even though I might actually think otherwise.

Seriously, it's been more than 3 years and Jason Yeo's case still under investigations. Must be a very complicated case to prosecute; at least when compared to Amos Yee's case! Not enough CSI forensic evidence is it?

 

[Leongsam]

His insult is many time worst than Amos.

Should be ".... many times WORSE....".

"Worse" is comparative.

"Worst" is superlative.

For more information, click on the links in my signature.

 

[soIsee]

Well Jason was telling the truth, so was Amos.

But what will happen to them is not the truth telling.

But what sort of truth, coming from who. LoL

 

[jw5]

Re: To SPF: Amos Yee is charged! What about the case of YPAP’s Jason Neo?

They need Grissom to return. DB is not getting it done.

Seriously, it's been more than 3 years and Jason Yeo's case still under investigations. Must be a very complicated case to prosecute; at least when compared to Amos Yee's case! Not enough CSI forensic evidence is it?

 

[gongkia]

Re: To SPF: Amos Yee is charged! What about the case of YPAP’s Jason Neo?

If they don't charge Jason Neo, will sinkie riot?

 

[virus]

Re: To SPF: Amos Yee is charged! What about the case of YPAP’s Jason Neo?

At the same time anton casey also boh taji n pornsak has not servdd ns

 

[virus]

Re: To SPF: Amos Yee is charged! What about the case of YPAP’s Jason Neo?

Seriously, it's been more than 3 years and Jason Yeo's case still under investigations. Must be a very complicated case to prosecute; at least when compared to Amos Yee's case! Not enough CSI forensic evidence is it?

Thats because jason neo bugger is a borrible mutherfarker worst then ello