<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Property index and saga of the three-hump camel
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->SINGAPORE'S Private Property Market Index looks like a mutant three-hump camel, registering a 45 per cent bust from the second quarter of 1996, a 40 per cent boom from the fourth quarter of 1998, a 20 per cent bust from the second quarter of 2000 and a 58 per cent rise from the first quarter of 2004, with the latest figures in the second quarter of this year dropping back to below the second hump.
Yet National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan said on Sept 2 that 'as far as (private home) prices are concerned, we want to make sure... there is no excessive speculation'.
With a three-hump camel of boom-busts in 13 years, at what point is speculation deemed 'excessive'? When a slew of sub-sale advertisements appear on soft launch and when kettles are owned for more than five years, yet property ownership of less than five years may not be 'property trading', it makes a mockery of tax laws.
Currently in land-scarce Singapore, we have 4.84 million residents (6,814 people per sq km), with a 6.5 million target population in 40 years. As Central Provident Fund savings are largely locked in home ownership, residential real estate goes beyond Mr Market's wheeling and dealing. To draw a parallel, it is equivalent to rice harvests in Vietnam as an agro-economy - except we are in perpetual drought.
Mr Mah urges Three Thinks - 'think carefully, think long term, think about the unexpected' - before we buy property.
I did Three Thinks before buying a condominium unit. Now I cannot do even One Thing when my neighbours sell the roof over my head.
Property is all about location and timing. Retirement wealth is at stake. Can Mr Mah follow South Korean laws and do One Thing for Singaporeans: 'Sell one, return one' instead of 'Double the price or half the size' in collective property sales?
Tan Meng Lee (Ms)
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>
<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->SINGAPORE'S Private Property Market Index looks like a mutant three-hump camel, registering a 45 per cent bust from the second quarter of 1996, a 40 per cent boom from the fourth quarter of 1998, a 20 per cent bust from the second quarter of 2000 and a 58 per cent rise from the first quarter of 2004, with the latest figures in the second quarter of this year dropping back to below the second hump.
Yet National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan said on Sept 2 that 'as far as (private home) prices are concerned, we want to make sure... there is no excessive speculation'.
With a three-hump camel of boom-busts in 13 years, at what point is speculation deemed 'excessive'? When a slew of sub-sale advertisements appear on soft launch and when kettles are owned for more than five years, yet property ownership of less than five years may not be 'property trading', it makes a mockery of tax laws.
Currently in land-scarce Singapore, we have 4.84 million residents (6,814 people per sq km), with a 6.5 million target population in 40 years. As Central Provident Fund savings are largely locked in home ownership, residential real estate goes beyond Mr Market's wheeling and dealing. To draw a parallel, it is equivalent to rice harvests in Vietnam as an agro-economy - except we are in perpetual drought.
Mr Mah urges Three Thinks - 'think carefully, think long term, think about the unexpected' - before we buy property.
I did Three Thinks before buying a condominium unit. Now I cannot do even One Thing when my neighbours sell the roof over my head.
Property is all about location and timing. Retirement wealth is at stake. Can Mr Mah follow South Korean laws and do One Thing for Singaporeans: 'Sell one, return one' instead of 'Double the price or half the size' in collective property sales?
Tan Meng Lee (Ms)
