• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

MRT killer sentenced to pay victims and families

GunsForHire

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Messages
70
Points
0

MRT killer sentenced to pay victims and families over NT$30 million


2015/08/07 21:25:27

201508070035t0001.jpg


CNA file photo

Taipei, Aug. 7 (CNA) The New Taipei City District Court Friday ordered Cheng Chieh (鄭捷), who killed four and wounded 22 in a Taipei mass rapid transit (MRT) train on May 21, 2014, to pay a total of NT$30.91 million (US$977,000) to 10 persons who are either victims or relatives of victims as compensation for their suffering.

Only 10 persons raised a civil suit against Cheng demanding compensation, because many victims and their families reckoned that Cheng's financial status would preclude him from paying the compensation.

The criminal court on March 7, 2015 sentenced Cheng, a university student in his early 20s, to death for manslaughter, while the civil division was still handling the civil suit filed by 10 persons, who demanded compensation for their losses in health and money, totaling NT$31.65 million.

The judge ruled that Cheng must pay the husband and two sons of Pan Pi-chu (潘碧珠), who died of a serious wound to the neck, a total of NT$16.66 million for medical and funeral expenses as well as compensation for their loss.

The seven other surviving victims who suffered differing degrees of wounds jointly filed the civil suit are supposed to receive compensation from Cheng, according to the court ruling.

Although the court will provide evidence of indebtedness to the victims and their families, it is highly unlikely that they will receive anything from Cheng, as the accused is said to have no property.

Meanwhile, Cheng has appealed to the High Court to review his death sentence.

(By H.S. Huang and Lillian Lin)



 
Back
Top