- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
- Messages
- 1,371
- Points
- 0
It has to in the early stages of development. Democracy is fine but that has led to distratrous results
Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, even Indonesia, all doing reasonably well.
It has to in the early stages of development. Democracy is fine but that has led to distratrous results
It has to in the early stages of development. Democracy is fine but that has led to distratrous results
Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, even Indonesia, all doing reasonably well.
Talk about dealing in absolutes..
South Koreas had an autocratic regime supported by the US. It had anti liberal policies until the 80s and 90s before limited liberalisation occurred.
Same goes for Taiwan. Early Taiwan was no more a regime than that of the PRC. Policies were not that of laissez faire economy
After their economies were well developed, both Taiwan and South Korea embrace full democracy, particularly the civil and political rights for the citizens.
Both continue to do well, with vibrant and creative societies.
define full democracy. No country has full democracy. Active government intervention is needed.
Separation of powers among the Executive, Judiciary and Parliament, with independent media, independent judiciary, rule of law, freedom of expression, freedom of assemblies, civil, political, social, cultural and economic rights etc.
Can lead to too many factions vying for power. As in the case of Singapore. Too many political parties.
It will eventually lead to two dominant parties.
In the case of S'pore, with an independent media and judiciary and civil and political rights, more able men and women will participate in the political process thus leading to one strong and big opposition party utimately.
That's your dream not reality.
That's your fear not reality.
Your dream. Dream on. with your no policy SDP/NSP/SPP/WP/RP
S'pore does not exist in a vacuum and has an obligation to follow international practices sooner or later.
Hard to say what interntional pratices are. Democracy is not the end state as Fukuyama said it to be
International pratices as to freedom of expression, assemblies, independent judiciary, independent media, civil and political rights.
And who follows those? The US where citizens can call all PRC spies? Where anti Iraq war activists were investigated by the FBI? Where media stations are slanted to be pro Republican and pro Democrat.
UK, US, HK, Taiwan, South Korea etc and countless other democratic countries all adhere to democratic practices.
There is a spectrum of views in the US media. US citizens can read all they want and draw their own conclusions.