• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

MM Lee: we are very careful about who becomes a citizen... pls put up with FTs...

kojakbt

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why should we listen to him ? Who is he and what so great about him ?

He thinks he is the "father" of modern Singapore, hence, people must listen to him.... HAHAHA!

p.s. he conveniently dropped all refs to the other old guards like Goh Keng Swee, Rajaratnam, Toh Chin Chye etc when talking about building Singapore...
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Business Times - 14 Nov 2009

Sino-Env given 30 days to tackle governance issues

Tough action follows summary dismissal of financial controller

By LYNETTE KHOO

THE Singapore Exchange has given Sino-Environment Technology 30 days to address issues raised by its independent directors (IDs) or face delisting after the IDs hit out at the company's summary dismissal of its financial controller.

In a letter to the company, SGX has also required the company to report to the exchange after 14 days from the date of the letter, which was Nov 13, on its actions to rectify the issues raised.

This unprecedented move came after the IDs informed the exchange that they have not been consulted on this dismissal and expressed concern over a 'clear failure of corporate governance within the company'.

Sino-Environment had disclosed on Tuesday that it has summarily dismissed financial controller Raynauld Liang Wee Leong 'on the grounds of misconduct and breach of duties'.

The IDs challenged this yesterday, saying that 'at no time have they encountered or been given any evidence of any misconduct or breach of duties on the part of the financial controller, as alleged in the announcements'.

They also stressed that they were not consulted on the summary dismissal, which should have been a matter for decision by the board and that they view the dismissal as unlawful.

The IDs noted that Mr Liang has carried out his duties in the best interest of the company. With his dismissal, the group will, in effect, be without a CFO.

Last month, it emerged that PwC had identified 'certain questionable cash transactions and matters' which may have a significant impact on the financial position of the company.

Mr Liang, on the instructions of the audit committee, lodged a report with the Commercial Affairs Department and the relevant authorities in China on the findings of the auditors.

The IDs requested on Oct 24 that chairman and CEO Sun Jiangrong resign but he refused. They again wrote to Mr Sun and the other two executive directors on Nov 5 to step down but they did not.

SGX yesterday expressed concern over the state of affairs at Sino-Environment, citing a breach of listing rule 103, that requires directors of an issuer to act in the interests of shareholders as a whole.

'In view of the seriousness of the developments in the company, the exchange urges all the directors to take urgent steps to ensure that any remaining assets and operations of the company is safeguarded and act in the interest of shareholders as a whole.'

Securities Investors Association (Singapore) (SIAS) has also weighed in on this issue. The investor watchdog noted that the actions of the executive directors have 'seriously compromised' shareholders' interest and called on the executive directors to step down immediately. It also urged shareholders to organise an EGM to oust the executive directors to ensure that the board is functional again.

'The position taken by the IDs not only seriously questions the credibility of the executive directors but also their ability to continue in office,' SIAS said.

http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/sub/news/story/0,4574,359459,00.html?

Another example of careful vetting by this world class place -this time of a foreign company listing here.
How many PRC companies have been in the spotlight for the wrong reasons?

Somebody from the world class universities here should make a study of the damage they have caused and point out the person/persons responsible and
to be held accountable for inviting them to list here.
 
Top