• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Mdm Chang: Ridiculous to say I was Dr Chou’s mistress!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/09/15/mdm-chang-ridiculous-to-say-i-was-dr-chous-mistress/

[h=2]Mdm Chang: Ridiculous to say I was Dr Chou’s mistress![/h]

dmca_protected_sml_120n.png
PostDateIcon.png
September 15th, 2014 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Editorial




yang-yin.jpg
Former PRC tour guide Yang Yin is currently embroiled in a
tussle over the $40 million assets of 87-year-old widow Chung Khin Chun. Mdm
Chung’s niece, Hedy Mok, has initiated court proceedings to revoke Mr Yang’s
guardianship of her aunt’s assets, alleging that Mr Yang has manipulated her
aunt to give him control over them.

In an affidavit filed by Mr Yang earlier, he defended himself to say that Mdm
Chung, who has no children, took a liking to him and asked him to be her
grandson in 2008 when he was a tour guide in China, for Mdm Chung and her
friend, 84-year-old Mdm Chang Phie Chin.

In his affidavit, he also accused Mdm Chang, who used to live in the bungalow
with Mdm Chung, of sharing “an extremely close relationship” with the widow’s
husband before he died in 2007. He even offered to reveal photographs of their
relationship in court.

Mdm Chang refuted Mr Yang’s statement and gave her rebuttal which was
published in the media today (15 Sep).

Mdm Chang slammed Mr Yang’s assertions that she was a mistress of the Mdm
Chung’s late husband. She said it was “ridiculous” that her relationship with
the late Dr Chou Sip King was being questioned.

Mdm Chang said that her friendship with Mdm Chung and Dr Chou started more
than 50 years ago. She first got to know the couple after visiting Dr Chou’s
clinic at Serangoon in 1958 as a patient.

She quickly hit it off with Mdm Chung as both of them are Hakkas. In fact,
they found out that both their grandfathers were from the same district in the
Guangdong province. Mdm Chang, who is single and does not have any siblings,
treats Mdm Chung as her older sister. Mdm Chang said, “Until today, we speak to
each other in Hakka. She is like an older sister to me.”


Apart from her common Hakka dialect with Mdm Chung, Mdm Chang said she shared
a love for travelling with the couple. From 1989 to 2001, they travelled to
China, Thailand and India.

“Both Dr Chou and his wife loved to see the scenic views of mountains and sea
in China,” revealed Mdm Chang. They stayed in separate hotel rooms during the
vacations, she said.

After Mdm Chang’s retirement from teaching in 1985, she would often visit the
couple at their bungalow to chit-chat.

In 2005, Dr Chou’s health deteriorated and he asked Mdm Chang to live with
them at their bungalow. He hoped that Mdm Chang would keep his wife company as
they were childless and his condition will not last long. Mdm Chang moved into
the bungalow and 2 years later, Dr Chou passed away.


Mdm Chang said that she continued to live in the bungalow, keeping the elder
Mdm Chung company. After Dr Chou passed away, Mdm Chung and Mdm Chang went for a
holiday trip to Beijing the following year in 2008. That was when Mdm Chung met
Mr Yang. Mdm Chang had known Mr Yang earlier from a previous tour.


After Mr Yang moved in with them in 2009, things started to change in the
house. Mr Yang “acted as if he owned the house, bossing the maids and driver
around rudely”, Mdm Chang said, adding that he eventually “ordered” certain
people, including neighbours, not to visit Mdm Chung.


Mdm Chang further related that Mr Yang fired one of Mdm Chung’s maids. The
maid had told her that Mdm Chung had to ask the maid for money to buy food as
Mdm Chung was afraid to ask Mr Yang.


Later, Mdm Chang herself also moved out of the house because of Mr Yang’s
behaviour. Also, she added that Mdm Chung would not heed her warnings about Mr
Yang.


Mdm Chang now feels responsible for Mdm Chung’s current predicament because
she was the one who had originally arranged for Mr Yang to be their tour guide
in 2008.

“If I didn’t introduce them, all these things wouldn’t have happened,” she
said with a sigh. “After all this is over, if my best friend still accepts me, I
don’t mind moving back to live with her. She is, after all, my only sister.”
 
The famous Tiong traits reveal themselves in their full glory. ;)

1) 死鸭子嘴硬

2) 恶人先告状

When confronted with the facts, they will still deny any wrongdoing, and will retaliate by accusing others of their wrongdoings.

No wonder he was found mingling with the PAP grassroots people. Birds of a feather flock together. ;)
 
The famous Tiong traits reveal themselves in their full glory. ;)

1) 死鸭子嘴硬

2) 恶人先告状

When confronted with the facts, they will still deny any wrongdoing, and will retaliate by accusing others of their wrongdoings.

No wonder he was found mingling with the PAP grassroots people. Birds of a feather flock together. ;)

Let me add 3) translated to english:

3) Thief shout catch thief!
 
The court case civil or crimminal?

Bro GD, can advise?
 
The famous Tiong traits reveal themselves in their full glory. ;)

1) 死鸭子嘴硬

2) 恶人先告状

When confronted with the facts, they will still deny any wrongdoing, and will retaliate by accusing others of their wrongdoings.

No wonder he was found mingling with the PAP grassroots people. Birds of a feather flock together. ;)

I think it is a common trick during law suit people will find things to counter sue. Even without legal suit, if evil people find you speaking bad things about them that are the truth; they will also do the same to fabricate malicious lies like accusing you to be mistress to harm you to remove the thorn. I believe the truth will always prevail in the end. But there are some stupid people who actually believe these malicious lies and help spread them.
 
Alamak! I hope it can also be criminal! The bloody swindler should not be let off back to China easily.

Can be criminal if it can be proven he forged signatures/documents for the purpose of cheating.
 
Falsifying documents is criminal. But I doubt the embarrassed incompetent bastards will take any form of action. Which is why we must kick them out
 
Back
Top