• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

McDonald and KFC assisting loanshark to harrass victims ?

YellowRibbon

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 3, 2009
Messages
496
Points
0
Loanshark can call these 2 to send delivery to the victim's address.

Imagine every half an hour from midnight to 6am, an order was made by loanshark to send delivery to the victim's address.

So is McDonalds and KFC indirectly harrassing the victims on behalf of the loanshark ?

Either the loanshark runs out of runners, or they are penniless to pay their runner so resort to this free-of-charge tactics ??

McDonalds and KFC replied that there is no way to block people from making an order to an address even though the number does not belongs to the owner.

There is no system in place to verify the delivery orders. They should do something as it is a waste of food and also waste of resources.

And indirectly harrassing a victim by providing a free service.

Can the riders also be classified as runners ?
 
Loanshark can call these 2 to send delivery to the victim's address.

Imagine every half an hour from midnight to 6am, an order was made by loanshark to send delivery to the victim's address.

So is McDonalds and KFC indirectly harrassing the victims on behalf of the loanshark ?

Either the loanshark runs out of runners, or they are penniless to pay their runner so resort to this free-of-charge tactics ??

McDonalds and KFC replied that there is no way to block people from making an order to an address even though the number does not belongs to the owner.

There is no system in place to verify the delivery orders. They should do something as it is a waste of food and also waste of resources.

And indirectly harrassing a victim by providing a free service.

Can the riders also be classified as runners ?

The reeiver of the food, can make a police report, & refuse to make payment, surely the fast food delivery orders have records of whom is making the orders, and the number can be obtained easily.
:D
 
The reeiver of the food, can make a police report, & refuse to make payment, surely the fast food delivery orders have records of whom is making the orders, and the number can be obtained easily.
:D

Yes, but you know all numbers associated with loansharks are not register by themselves. You can easily get a registered sim card at Geylang, Chinatown etc
 
Why can't they connect to Singtel and certify who is calling is actually staying at the resident?
 
Why can't they connect to Singtel and certify who is calling is actually staying at the resident?

That's the loophole the loansharks are taking. No verification by the fast food call center.

And best of all, its free.
 
Loanshark can call these 2 to send delivery to the victim's address.

Imagine every half an hour from midnight to 6am, an order was made by loanshark to send delivery to the victim's address.

So is McDonalds and KFC indirectly harrassing the victims on behalf of the loanshark ?

Either the loanshark runs out of runners, or they are penniless to pay their runner so resort to this free-of-charge tactics ??

McDonalds and KFC replied that there is no way to block people from making an order to an address even though the number does not belongs to the owner.

There is no system in place to verify the delivery orders. They should do something as it is a waste of food and also waste of resources.

And indirectly harrassing a victim by providing a free service.

Can the riders also be classified as runners ?

shouldnt the person receiving the food be happy? no need to make an order, someone will order for them. :D
 
Must be costing MacD & KFC a bomb in wasted food deliveries.

They must be working on a system to blacklist certain addresses from repeated deliveries. There's nothing more important than profits to large corporations :)
 
That's the loophole the loansharks are taking. No verification by the fast food call center.

And best of all, its free.

Have you ordered fast food before?

Order must provide Credit Card number before delivery!

So Loan shark use their own credit card?

:)
 
The reeiver of the food, can make a police report, & refuse to make payment, surely the fast food delivery orders have records of whom is making the orders, and the number can be obtained easily.
:D

Clever boy ~
 
Yes, but you know all numbers associated with loansharks are not register by themselves. You can easily get a registered sim card at Geylang, Chinatown etc

That means they should be rfid microchipped. So when the central government is informed of any social disturbance they can be traced and the police and military can both be called upon to immediately find and deal with them.

In some countries the elites have begun classifying hooligans as terrorists.
 
shouldnt the person receiving the food be happy? no need to make an order, someone will order for them. :D

Why happy ? Imagine every 15mins a delivery rider knock on your door ?

Have you ordered fast food before?

Order must provide Credit Card number before delivery!

So Loan shark use their own credit card?

:)

??? For your info, credit card is not needed. I am refering to phone order.. not internet order if that is what you mean.
 
Back
Top