MARUAH shoots back at government!

[BuiKia]

This letter was sent to ST Forum on 2 May 2013, but was not published.

To:
The Editor
Forum Page
The Straits Times

Dear Sir,

We refer to the joint statement by the Ministry of Manpower and Ministry of Home Affairs (“Joint Response to Media Queries on Statements by NGOs/individuals and Former SMRT Driver He Junling”, 26 April 2013.) The statement accuses the NGOs and individuals involved in the SMRT drivers’ case of “hindering the investigation while continuing to cast aspersions on the integrity of the police.” It also claims that the NGOs and individuals have exploited vulnerable foreign workers for their own political ends.

We are troubled that the government sees the involvement of civil society in pushing for greater transparency as casting aspersions on the integrity of the police and “working for their own political ends.”

MARUAH seeks clarity on the government’s definition on “political ends” and would like to know how asking questions on processes of investigations has cast aspersions on the integrity of the police. We believe that transparency is key to confidence-building and dialogue between the government and civil society, essential for a healthy democracy. More will be achieved with greater clarity from the government to clear doubts and assure that individuals in police custody are accorded proper protection, which is important to both the government and to civil society groups.

It is also part of Singapore’s constitution that guarantees Singapore citizens the rights to freedom of speech and expression, and association. Rather than taking an adversarial tone and seeing civil society as the political opposition, we call on the government to respect and in time also welcome such non-partisan citizen engagement on the major issues that concern our country.

We hope Singapore will continue to evolve and become a mature society where differing points of view can be discussed openly and honestly, without acrimony.

Ms Braema Mathi
President
MARUAH

 

[enterprise2]

This letter was sent to ST Forum on 2 May 2013, but was not published.

To:
The Editor
Forum Page
The Straits Times

Dear Sir,

We refer to the joint statement by the Ministry of Manpower and Ministry of Home Affairs (“Joint Response to Media Queries on Statements by NGOs/individuals and Former SMRT Driver He Junling”, 26 April 2013.) The statement accuses the NGOs and individuals involved in the SMRT drivers’ case of “hindering the investigation while continuing to cast aspersions on the integrity of the police.” It also claims that the NGOs and individuals have exploited vulnerable foreign workers for their own political ends.

We are troubled that the government sees the involvement of civil society in pushing for greater transparency as casting aspersions on the integrity of the police and “working for their own political ends.”

MARUAH seeks clarity on the government’s definition on “political ends” and would like to know how asking questions on processes of investigations has cast aspersions on the integrity of the police. We believe that transparency is key to confidence-building and dialogue between the government and civil society, essential for a healthy democracy. More will be achieved with greater clarity from the government to clear doubts and assure that individuals in police custody are accorded proper protection, which is important to both the government and to civil society groups.

It is also part of Singapore’s constitution that guarantees Singapore citizens the rights to freedom of speech and expression, and association. Rather than taking an adversarial tone and seeing civil society as the political opposition, we call on the government to respect and in time also welcome such non-partisan citizen engagement on the major issues that concern our country.

We hope Singapore will continue to evolve and become a mature society where differing points of view can be discussed openly and honestly, without acrimony.

Ms Braema Mathi
President
MARUAH

Sock it to them Braema!

 

[ray_of_hope]

Rather than taking an adversarial tone and seeing civil society as the political opposition, we call on the government to respect and in time also welcome such non-partisan citizen engagement on the major issues that concern our country.

Maruah is non-partisan? I see...

 

[blissquek]

Sock it to them Braema![/QUOTE

U fill your role well... i have high regard ..

However, your post may soon be quietly achived ,taken off ,as u know how censorship is like in this regimented state.

Best wishes to u and hope to hear your views more often...

 

[ThePlen]

what can i say? hell hath no fury like a woman scorn

Sock it to them Braema!

 

[halsey02]

Sock it to them Braema!

Itu Minah chantek or not? psst! be careful what you say to her...."sock" it to her may be construed as something obscene : http://www.aware.org.sg/2011/01/braema-mathi-joins-aware-as-research-and-advocacy-director/

Special bred "wooo, wooo, wooo"...pretend to be fighting for your rights...

 

[enterprise2]

Itu Minah chantek or not? psst! be careful what you say to her...."sock" it to her may be construed as something obscene : http://www.aware.org.sg/2011/01/braema-mathi-joins-aware-as-research-and-advocacy-director/

Special bred "wooo, wooo, wooo"...pretend to be fighting for your rights...

I wrote "Sock it to them.." NOT "Sock it to her..". U guys can read or not!!

 

[scroobal]

I have issues with Maruah and their focus on foreign workers but this is the lady that first raised concerns about Durai and NKF in parliament when she was an NMP. The then Health Minister stated that he had full confidence in Durai and NKF.

 

[halsey02]

I wrote "Sock it to them.." NOT "Sock it to her..". U guys can read or not!!

You never read, CONSTRUED? She is AWARE, you should be aware..she might think, you want ti sock it to her..it becomes a dirty word... ha ha ha ha

 

[myfoot123]

She always ask questions that the govt is never capable of answering. The most is PAP will come out with standard reply without adhering to the questions asked, as in her question why Nizam was asked to resign while other NGO MPs are not.

 

[lesMISERABLES]

..................but this is the lady that first raised concerns about Durai and NKF in parliament when she was an NMP. The then Health Minister stated that he had full confidence in Durai and NKF.

She always ask questions that the govt is never capable of answering. The most is PAP will come out with standard reply without adhering to the questions asked, as in her question why Nizam was asked to resign while other NGO MPs are not.

Protestants (read: those who protest against LEEgime's excesses) need people like her to put the PAPists in their rightful place and to continue the Reformation.

 

[postnew]

Simi sock ?​

 

[Qantas]

Simi sock ?​

Our very own Ambiga of Behsih fame?.:}