- Joined
- Oct 1, 2008
- Messages
- 2,459
- Points
- 63
sorry...no matter how hard i try, i just don't see anderson in schole's role. his passing is not top notch, his shooting sucks, he is too short to win balls in the air, he is not robust to act as DM (sorry maybe he is not meant to be DM). Scholes is AM...perhaps if and only if Man U buys another striker, rooney can drop to AM...but if budget is a constraint which i believe so, a striker is not priority for next season.
Darron Gibson seems more in Scholes role - ie his long shots. But his passing is doubtful.
About Youth Academy, it is not really that the players are not good but rather they don't have now the luxury of matches to prove themselves perhaps only if there is an injury here and there. Otherwise, given the highly competitive nature - the managers won't risk them - we see only flashes of Fabio, Chester guy and Pussybon (before he is wrecked by injury) in Micky Mouse cup matches....otherwise, none...is it bcos they sucks ...maybe not, becos u really need the League matches to grind out skills. Thats why when they went over to the lower teams, they walk into their first team and can put up credible performance. think - Eagles, Shawcross.
Problem with Anderson is his attitude and consistency. Come X'mas holidays, it just goes bad. Like the other Brazilian team mates, they want to spend X'mas with their love ones back home. I guess we've all heard Fergie calling for a X'mas break.
D. Gibson is highly inconsistent and unpredictable. On a good day,he'll produce the most spectacular shots and on others you'll have to widen the goal posts. He's got a lot of work ahead of him and he can certainly improve if Fergie plays him regularly.
On the issue of youth academy, I stand corrected-the players are not good enough to play for Man. Utd. If they're good, the boss will let them thru'-think D. Fletcher.