:mad:HK’s Fearless Judiciary versus SG’s KANGAROO Courts - Banzai Tan Siong Thye!

[WongMengMeng]

The headline may be simplistic, but as they say in journalism – an article is worth nothing unless you get people to read it. So my apologies.

What has the name Tan Siong Thye got to do with the story then? It is the name of the judge that is presiding over the FIXING of a certain academic over trumped up charges of sex for grades. You will notice that the mainstream media mostly do not mention the name of the judge in reports of this case, just as they do not mention that Tony Tan is a relative of LKY. This is to protect the judge from ridicule when the pre-ordained verdict is released, just as it is never mentioned that Tony Tan is a relative of LKY to create in Sinkie minds an illusion that meritocracy exists in Singapore when it fact it should be spelled MARRIEDtocracy.

I note that a thread has been started harping on the PR status of a certain former judge who is presently being FIXED well and good by the LEEgime’s Mafia CPIB with the connivance of a Compliant Judiciary. The thread starter also happens to be the one who “inadvertently” released photos of an ordinary citizen who happens to have the “misfortune” of having the same name as Laura Ong’s sister on the Internet. The PAPzis of course need to divert attention away from Michael Palmer, and such distractions are usually started by you know who.

Anyway, if you are a PMET like me, whom the PAP is trying to replace to neutralize your potential Opposition vote, and prefer more intelligent discussions rather than threads with PAP IBs talking to themselves, please join this instead.

Banzai! Tan Siong Thye! A medal to you for contributing to the KANGAROO-isation of Sinkie Courts.

My next post is on how foreign judges have contributed greatly to our rival, Hong Kong’s truly independent judiciary. I promise you will never find this sort of articles in the Shit Times.

Sammyboy's next security question? - Q: What animal is most frequent associated with Sinkie Courts? A: KANGAROO

 

[Tuayapeh]

The minute the media slut TST was appointed to hear this case, you can be sure that the Leegime knew that it was in "safe hands'./.....nobody who has work3ed with him before had anything decent to say about him except that he is one siao on, kiasi and desperate to score points typical civil servant....the odds for acquittal is 100 to 1 man.....

 

[WongMengMeng]

A foreigner with PR status in Hong Kong has made great contributions to the independence of our rival's judiciary. When he retired recently, a laudatory article appeared in the SCMP. This KANGAROO Tan cannot hold a candle to this Rhodesian in Hong Kong.

In Sinkieland, to be awarded any sort of government medal or even be appointed as senior counsel, you first and foremost need to be ... a SYCHOPHANT. Making decisions against the government, like Justice Michael Hartmann, will only cause you to be "transferred", ahem, I mean demoted aka Michael Khoo.

Trusted judge who fought for legal integrity of city
Mr Justice Michael Hartmann began his career as a reporter in Africa, and carried his liberal attitudes into the city's highest courtrooms

Mr Justice Michael Hartmann may not be the most publicly visible judge to have served in the High Court but few equal his reputation for handing down rulings that are consistently liberal, except, perhaps, for Mr Justice Kemal Bokhary.

Hartmann was one of the five Court of Final Appeal judges who ruled last month on the right of abode of foreign domestic workers in Hong Kong. While the whole city was waiting for the landmark ruling, Hartmann was the first judge on the panel to make a robust defence of the judiciary.

In last month's issue of Hong Kong Lawyer, published by the Law Society and which came out about two weeks before the ruling, Hartmann said Hong Kong's courts would remain as independent and well-respected as they are now, regardless of what some cynics may say. The following week, Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma Tao-li, speaking at Chinese University, echoed this view and described a "fearless judiciary", which would deliver sound judgments regardless if they were in line with the government's wishes.

When, last Monday, the city's top court delivered its judgment, it refused to entertain the controversial request by the secretary for justice for it to refer to the National People's Congress Standing Committee for an interpretation of the Basic Law.

During his career as a full-time judge between 1991 and his retirement July last year, Hartmann heard numerous Judicial Review cases involving human rights, and on many occasions ruled against the government.

But his passion to uphold the rule of law and to safeguard the constitutional rights of Hong Kong people is unquestionable.
In Hong Kong Lawyer, Hartmann explained why joining the judiciary was the best decision of his life - aside from asking his wife Melanie to marry him. "One of the reasons is the fact that I joined a top-rate institution. One that, in my opinion, has had a critical role to play in Hong Kong's post-1997 prosperity."

In 2006, Hartmann ruled that covert surveillance operations conducted in the city had no valid legal basis. He ruled as unconstitutional a law authorities had relied on for decades to allow phone-tapping, but he gave the government six months to get its house in order.

In a judicial review in 2008, he decided the Broadcasting Authority had restricted freedom of speech when it made a discriminatory ruling against an RTHK television programme about homosexuality.

Another eyebrow-raising decision was his ruling in the Court of First Instance against granting the Independent Commission Against Corruption a warrant to search the newsrooms of seven major newspapers, including the South China Morning Post, in 2004. His written judgment in the case reflected his deep support for upholding freedom of the press.

The ICAC said the search was part of a serious criminal investigation but Hartmann said this was not sufficient to justify the warrant. He also noted a judge had a responsibility to ensure the legal process was not abused by law enforcement agencies because "an application for a search warrant constitutes a serious intrusion upon the freedom of the press".

Although his ruling was later overturned by the Court of Appeal, he gained the admiration of the city's journalists.

Chairwoman of the Journalists Association Mak Yin-ting said Hartmann had adopted a liberal approach in interpreting the law, legal principles and concepts about human rights - the last of which was both important and appropriate. "Instead of narrowly and literally interpreting the law, a constitutional judge should adopt a liberal attitude and a broad approach when the issues deal with human rights or … the rights will not be effectively protected," Mak said.

Hartmann's interest in press freedom is not entirely surprising - early in his career he was a reporter in Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe.
Hartmann was born in Mumbai in 1944 in a British military hospital to an English father and an Australian mother. He finished his education at a boarding school in England then went to university in Southern Rhodesian. He left three years after its independence in 1980.

For the rest of the article, please click:

http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1204180/trusted-judge-who-fought-legal-integrity-city

Sammyboy's next security question? Q: What animal is most frequently associated with Sinkie Courts? A: KANGAROO