• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Lui Tuck Yew says it's a pity........

  • Thread starter Thread starter suicidalpap
  • Start date Start date
S

suicidalpap

Guest
A pity World Cup deal not concluded earlier: Lui Tuck Yew
Acting Communications, Information and the Arts Minister Lui Tuck Yew has said it is a pity that negotiations to bring the World Cup to Singapore could not have been concluded earlier.

This may have impacted on advertising revenue and overall support generated for the deal.

Mr Lui said: "The negotiations were difficult obviously because you know it has taken such a long time. Again, it's a bit of a pity because if it would have been concluded earlier, then the advertising revenue as well as support from advertisers and so many other people could have come much earlier.

"But I think at the end of the day, the World Cup here in Singapore is still better than not having it."

In response to the recent debate about the higher price subscribers would have to pay this time round, Mr Lui said it boils down to individual choice. But he said those who do not wish to subscribe still have a variety of options.

He added: "They can go to their friend's place, or they can watch it in the coffee shop or maybe in the pubs. So I think at the end of the day, what we have are choices for Singaporeans and it is up to them whether they wish to subscribe or not." Mr Lui was speaking to the media at the sidelines of the Singapore Arts Festival launch on Friday evening.

He was also asked about the criticism by the Cable & Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia (CASBAA) to amendments to Singapore's pay-TV industry.

The association, which represents the interests of 130 content producers and operators across 16 Asian markets, is taking issue with the recently revised Media Market Conduct Code, which mandates the cross carriage of exclusive content in the pay TV market.

Singapore's Media Development Authority (MDA) introduced in March an additional Public Interest Obligation, which requires qualified pay TV licensees to carry each other's content.

The association said the code "deprives content owners and creators of their freedom to negotiate contracts in a competitive market.

Mr Lui said he is looking over the appeals submitted by various content providers.

He said: "What happens is that the appeal process is ongoing and obviously because I am going to decide on the appeals, I will have to listen to both sides. It is best not to comment too much ahead of time.

"... But you can be sure that we will take time to listen to all the different stakeholders, and we will give utmost thought, serious consideration to all the inputs that they have to give to MDA and the ministry."
 
Singapore's Media Development Authority (MDA) introduced in March an additional Public Interest Obligation, which requires qualified pay TV licensees to carry each other's content.

The association said the code "deprives content owners and creators of their freedom to negotiate contracts in a competitive market.

Mr Lui said he is looking over the appeals submitted by various content providers.

He said: "What happens is that the appeal process is ongoing and obviously because I am going to decide on the appeals, I will have to listen to both sides. It is best not to comment too much ahead of time.

I am sorry but what does this paper general who has never watched porn in his life knows anything about media, entertainment and the legalities of them all?
 
Sometimes, this Ah yew talks like a piece of shit. Like all scums-in-white, a very untrustworthly person.
 
.......
Mr Lui said: "The negotiations were difficult obviously because you know it has taken such a long time. Again, it's a bit of a pity because if it would have been concluded earlier, then the advertising revenue as well as support from advertisers and so many other people could have come much earlier.
....

What the fark is he talking about ? I don't seemed to understand the purpose or message of the statement.

What is he pitying about and what is his point ?????

Sorry I did not finish this entire article to comment any further. Bett go brush up my MTL. Hope I am not lossing my England.
 
>>"But I think at the end of the day, the World Cup here in Singapore is still better than not having it." <<

AntUAss jus called. They want their Professor of Blatant Obviousness 101 back!
 
What the fark is he talking about ? I don't seemed to understand the purpose or message of the statement.

What is he pitying about and what is his point ?????

Sorry I did not finish this entire article to comment any further. Bett go brush up my MTL. Hope I am not lossing my England.

You are not losing your England. It's Lui whose England is horrible plus terrible.:D
 
what a bloody stupid reply from a minister earning huge pay checks. What is so difficult about the deals? The way he put it is as if Starhub and ST doing their bloody best to conclude a deal and we must appreciate them. Why is it that 90% of the countries in the world can get it right before us. Why is it that they can confirm the deal before us. So he is implying that the telco in this companies are more competent than our ST and SH. ST and SH are the ones who screwed up the negotiations with their previous track records. This show that Singaporeans are bloody carrot head who pays far more than what is actually worth and only know how to pass on the costs and in the end the consumers are the ones who are called upon to foot the costs. This practices must stop. I cannot imagine coffeeshop needing to pay 14k just to get WC to their 7 TV screen. This is bloody daylight robbery and if they do it, i do not think they will earn much. Why subscribe and run the risk of making a loss or pathetic earnings. Once subscribed the winners will be ST and SH and consumers will be treated like idiots and carrothead agaain
 
Most other coutries outside of the Middle East carry the matches free-to-air.In other words, Mediacorp should have been the one to air the games. But since Temasek and PAP owns all three companies involved and even MDA, you can bet your last dollar that PAP will find a way to squeeze as much from SGs as possible.

The irony is that Mediacorp would have earned a lot of money from advertising sales BUT the two telcos will earn even more especially from consumers like you and me.

In a true competitive environment, the people running the bidding for their companies would have been sacked a long time ago for creating poor PR for tir companies. But under Temasek and PAP, they have done an outstanding job and will get promoted.

If bad-teeth Lui doesn't watch porn and the 154th talks about it, does it then mean that all other PAP MPs watch porn?

And you can always count on the 154th to sweep the difficult questions and continue to support all of the nonsense of the PAP and their cronies.
 
KNNB Pity ki lan,,,,

many countries broadcast free for the nation,,,,,,

messed up a simple once every 4 years world cup telecast,,,,,

must be frantic calling MNCs and GLCs to help to pay for the fee liao since some sports brand pull-out,,,

please people, vote these buggers out,,,,,,,,,,,,
 
He added: "They can go to their friend's place, or they can watch it in the coffee shop or maybe in the pubs. So I think at the end of the day, what we have are choices for Singaporeans and it is up to them whether they wish to subscribe or not." Mr Lui was speaking to the media at the sidelines of the Singapore Arts Festival launch on Friday evening.

=> Indeed, Sporns have a choice to make every 5 years. Will the 66% make the same choice again? Would anybody take pity of them if they do?
 
Back
Top