I will explain to you like this.
On a contract this size, a down payment, initial payment is usually made. Than progressive draws are given on a predetermined interval, usually based on the amount of work that has already been done. eg. 20% completed on the project gets a draw of XXX$ for Alpine Bau. Its is possible that LTA made the initial payment, but Alpine did not do enough work as per the contract.
The clue is that Alpine Bau made the project so far behind because of its bankruptcy that LTA was forced to hire not one back up but 2 back contractors to finish the job. And they paid a premuim for these contractors to work overtime to get it done close to the deadline. When you are forced to hire contractors at such short notice and you ask them to expedite the work for you, they will quote you a high bid because you need them to pretty much try to meet the deadline no expenses spared. This is where the loss comes in, it is costing LTA hundreds of millions of $ in extra cost to hire these 2 companies to finish up at breakneck speed. LTA is trying to recover this cost from Alpine Bau. But this does not answer the following questions:
- Where was the completion bond on this project? LTA should have insisted on Alpine Bau giving them a performance bond, usually in an irrevocable LOC from a bank, so if Alpine cannot finish the project, LTA calls the bond and gets some money that way. Minimum should be a $100 million perfomance bond.
-WHy did LTA nor Alpine Brau take out insurance on the project to protect themselves from this eventuality?
- Why was there no clause in the contract that would allow LTA to terminate it in the even of insolvency of Alpine or if Alpine was sold or merged with another company. Instead of immediately terminating the contract, they dragged it on until the project is so far behind schedule. They need to cut their losses early and run.
After over 20 years of building MRT, they still don't have a singapore company that can do this? They are always giving the MRT projects to Japanese, Koreans, European companies etc. What happens in those countries to the parent companies, no one knows. If a local company was awarded such a MRT project and in the middle of it encountered financial difficulties, the word would have been out and LTA would know about it long before anything happens instead of being blind sided like this. Bottom line is LTA did not do proper due dilligence on Alpine and then never monitored Alpine's financial health after awarding them the contract. Lewd Fuck You is strangely silent on this.