• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Look at how social welfare bring UK down

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Meet the British bosses who say: Give us foreign workers every time

Figures released yesterday showed that the number of British workers in jobs fell by 311,000 in the past year, while foreign employees went up by 181,000. After the announcement, the Mail spoke to three businessmen about their own experiences and why they think foreign workers are getting the jobs


CHARLIE MULLINS - PLUMBING BOSS
The number of foreign employees at a leading firm of plumbers has doubled over the past two years because British workers lack the right work ethic.
Charlie Mullins, the 52-year-old founder of Pimlico Plumbers, said Britons would ‘rather be footballers than do an honest day’s work’.
Mr Mullins, whose firm has 200 staff, said he was forced to employ foreign-born people because they work harder than their British counterparts.

Charlie Mullins, who runs Pimlico Plumbers, claimed many Britons would 'rather be footballers than do a hard day's work'
‘We’re increasingly employing foreign workers. They have the right attitude and are prepared to work harder,’ he said.
‘The younger British generation who come in for interviews are often sent by the benefit people and have no desire to work.
‘It’s a case of “won’t work”, not “can’t work”. They feel as if the country owes them a living.’
He said the number of foreign-born workers he employed at the company, London’s largest independent plumbers, had doubled in the past two years to 40, or 20 per cent of his staff.
They are mostly from South Africa and work as plumbers and tradesmen, roles which command annual salaries between £50,000 and £70,000.
But he also employs workers from Ireland, Italy, Australia and Spain in various roles in both the administrative side of the business and the trade side.
More...Foreign workers take yet more UK jobs as number of Britons in work plunges and youth unemployment hits one million
'Lost generation' blighted by unemployment at risk of debt, depression and self-loathing, warn experts


And he said his foreign-born employees tended to earn more than native workers because they were willing to put in overtime and keen to increase their workload.
Mr Mullins, from Kent, founded the firm in 1979. It now has a turnover of £17million. But he said that many of the British people he interviewed for jobs had the wrong attitude and demanded too much.
‘British workers are too picky and choosy and not prepared to work hard,’ he said. ‘They are demanding ridiculous money.
‘Many of the young people who come in for interviews have never even been in a workplace. Many of them have degrees: I don’t need people with degrees – I need people with the right attitude.’



KEITH ABEL - ORGANIC GREENGROCER
Keith Abel has taken on foreign staff because British workers did not want to do jobs for his company
Keith Abel was forced to employ foreign-born workers because his popular firm, which delivers organic groceries, has struggled to find young British people to fill vacant positions.
He said some young Britons were trapped in the benefits system and did not want to get up early to do a job for £7-an-hour when they could rely on Government handouts.

Mr Abel, who started Abel and Cole more than 20 years ago, said: ‘We’ve got a fantastic workforce, we’ve got extremely hard-working people.
‘It’s just a bit of a tragedy that a considerable and significant number of them are from Eastern Europe and not the local communities given the rates of unemployment in the local area.’
He said his company could not recruit young British people to work for £7.25-an-hour as delivery drivers and that some young British people on benefits would rather receive handouts than work.
'People are not prepared to start with what they deem to be menial jobs. Terry Leahy, the head of Tesco, famously started stacking shelves. Everyone starts at the bottom'‘People who are in the benefits system struggle with the concept of getting out of bed at 5.30 to do a six o’clock until three o’clock shift on £7 an hour when the actual additional income they’d be taking home is initially very small,’ he told BBC Radio 5 Live.
‘The point is, the better-paid work comes for the people who start on the lower-paid work. There must be a solution whereby the Government is able to wean people off benefits rather than shut them off completely when somebody goes into a job.’

Mr Abel, 47, whose company turned over £30million last year, also said there was a reluctance among young people to start at the bottom and work their way up.
Mr Abel's company turned over £30m last year and he said he would happily find work for British people willing to work
He said: ‘People are not prepared to start with what they deem to be menial jobs. Terry Leahy, the head of Tesco, famously started stacking shelves. Everyone starts at the bottom.’
He said he would happily find roles for young British people who were out of work. ‘If people who are on the unemployment register want to ask us for jobs, we’d interview them in exactly the same way we interview anyone else,’ he added.
‘Business people are in there to do business. Politicians are in there to solve problems like unemployment.’



TERRY ROGERS - HOTEL OWNER
Terry Rogers says he has come to the sad conclusion that young Britons do not want to work
While horrified that more than a million young people in Britain are unemployed, I’m afraid I’m not at all surprised. After working in the catering industry for 16 years – many of those as a manager seeking to employ staff – I have come to the sad conclusion that many young people simply do not want to work.
Of course they say they want a job. They send off job applications and turn up for interviews. But when it comes down to hard graft, they are simply not interested.
The truth is that young people think the state owes them a living.

Underpinning everything is a welfare state which creates a culture where no one worries whether they have a job or not because there’s always free money from the Government to fall back on.
Also, brought up in school and home environments where criticism is practically non-existent, when they face the tough, challenging world of work, they are unable to cope.
To hear them complain about the shortage of jobs you would think they are desperate to work, willing to walk over hot coals to get a job. However, nothing could be further from the truth.

During my career, I have interviewed and employed many young people. And it shames me to say this but it was often easier to teach English to foreign applicants than it is to try to instill the right work ethic in our own English-speaking youth.
Time and again I see young people turn up for interviews wearing grubby jeans or tracksuits. They smoke and talk on the phone to their friends.
Many of them come with their partner or a parent (some even send their parents on ahead while they have a lie-in). What’s more, a lot don’t seem interested in the post at all – having turned up just so I can sign their Jobseekers’ Allowance form which means they can continue to receive welfare benefits.
One wretched soul told me he couldn’t work on Friday nights or Saturday mornings because he would be out with friends on Friday evenings and hung-over on Saturday morning!
Of those who do inquire seriously about the jobs, they often demand preposterous conditions. Many say they don’t want to work weekends or evenings because they want to go out with their friends. One applicant said the half-hour walk to work was too far.
One wretched soul told me he couldn’t work on Friday nights or Saturday mornings because he would be out with friends on Friday evenings and hung-over on Saturday morning! And they expect me to reward their commitment with a job?
Rather than interviewees doing their best to persuade me that I should employ them, the roles have become absurdly reversed with me having to persuade them to take the job.
Already I have had to let eight people go – and we have only been open since March – because they didn’t have the right attitude. One phoned in sick on his second day and never came back. Another lasted two weeks then she said the job was not for her because she missed Friday nights out with friends.

Another youngster was training for an NVQ qualification in our fine-dining team but lacked any ambition and decided life would be easier if she returned to her old job at a pub, where food was just heated in a microwave.

And I sacked one employee for phoning in sick, then posting pictures of herself at a social event on the same day on Facebook.

How then have we got ourselves into this ridiculous position?
All three managers argue that many British employees are more interested in taking benefits and going out drinking and socialising than holding down a job (posed by models)
Schools must take part of the blame. They teach subjects such as media studies, which give them false hopes about the type of jobs they can secure. There is a limit to the number of people who can work on The X Factor.
The tragedy is that so many youngsters seem devoid of real-life experience. This is where parents are at fault. From what I have seen, many parents have the same disengaged, uncommitted and welfare-sodden attitudes as their children.
Among many, there seems to be an utter absence of any sense of responsibility, work ethic or pride in contributing to society.
I recently gave a talk to a careers night at a local college. The youngsters stood slouched, hands in pockets staring up at the ceiling, some of them whistling under their breath. Not a single parent present chastised them for such unacceptable disrespect to an adult who had given up their time to address them.
There are those, however, who will do anything to secure a job.

I once interviewed a young man in Staffordshire. He had taken a ferry, train and bus from the Isle of Man to make the appointment. He was wearing a suit and tie.
Among many, there seems to be an utter absence of any sense of responsibility, work ethic or pride in contributing to society
I gave him a job as a waiter and he’s now an events manager for a university. You’ve probably guessed – he is foreign (having been born in Indonesia).
One of the best employees I ever had was a young Turk who barely spoke any English. He was so keen that I gave him a backroom job.

After infuriating weeks when other British employees had called in sick or turned up late, I put the Turk on the frontline. He was polite and friendly, happily juggling the job with two afternoons of English classes each week. He now manages one of the bars in Dublin Airport.

Job opportunities are certainly here and I want to give them to young people in my local area, but I’ve hit a wall. In desperation this week, I asked friends in the catering industries in Spain, Morocco and Holland to recommend any staff.

The first step to raise standards in our home-grown young is to admit that, for many, unemployment has become a personal choice to avoid hard work – and not an inescapable trap.
 

neddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Brits are hopeless. When I studied there, I used to get a lot of free things simply by complaining or showing my NUS* card. The cashiers are innumerate and NHS free.

If they cannot count, how do you think they treat money.

*National Unions of Students.
 

Cruxx

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hard work is overrated. How many Sinkies could claim to have worked as hard as the bangalas toiling under the sun with only 1 off day/week at most? :rolleyes:
 

Tonychatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Brits are hopeless. When I studied there, I used to get a lot of free things simply by complaining or showing my NUS* card. The cashiers are innumerate and NHS free.

If they cannot count, how do you think they treat money.

*National Unions of Students.

What a shameless Sinkie. Most people with any sense of shame would have kept their mouths shut after ripping off the system. But the stupid Sinkie will always shame himself.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
social welfare like the one in UK , which citizen are entitle as rights, is a bad idea. Instead of creating something for people to fall back on, it just create a group of people who are not willing to work.
 

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
social welfare like the one in UK , which citizen are entitle as rights, is a bad idea. Instead of creating something for people to fall back on, it just create a group of people who are not willing to work.

Then UK should do something to tweak this system so people can still fall back on while the young still have the motivation to work.

But some sinkie losers start to use this as a way to tell the whole population of stupid and coward sinkie that welfare is 100% no good.. balh blah blah.

fuck you man, when the system deem not suitable when the time and people change as time goes by, the system has to change and tweak accordingly...it is as simple as that..
 
Last edited:

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
When you gave the people social welfare, you cannot take it back. Any gov in UK would want to tweak it will be kick out in the next election, it is a vicious cycle. Why you want social welfare so much, so you can seat at home like a bum and surf the net the whole days right?
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
When you gave the people social welfare, you cannot take it back. Any gov in UK would want to tweak it will be kick out in the next election, it is a vicious cycle. Why you want social welfare so much, so you can seat at home like a bum and surf the net the whole days right?

Exactly. Can't believe once upon a time government providing affordable public housing was a noble social goal. These days when the PAP government start to claw that back, you have spoilt brats howling with fury about how they cannot afford it. Want to cut back on subsidies also difficult.

The PAP should not have give social welfare to people in the form of housing subsidies. This only breed laziness and contempt for hard work.
 
Last edited:

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
The PAP should not have give social welfare to people in the form of housing subsidies. This only breed laziness and contempt for hard work.

OK I went out of point since you were referring specifically to unemployment benefits.

The unemployment benefits are gamed, and the local Brits have shitty attitudes. Thank goodness sinkies have deep pockets despite the lousy attitude.
 
Last edited:

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It is a very noble idea, when UK introduced social welfare, it is a means to help a minority of people who hit hard time and give them something for them to fall back on, then with the state social welfare help, these people will recover and go up to work.

Forward to today's, the citizen think it is their rights to social welfare and they complain that it is not enough, people with illness uses it as excuses not to work, people who feel that working does not paid, so they prefer to stay at home, people who get themselves pregnant so they do not have to work, and the state feed them.

Children born in family who never work one day in their life, and children who do the same.

The idea of social welfare is very good, but the worse of human nature will turn it into a bad thing. Therefore, social welfare must not be introduce in singapore.
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Before UK have social welfare, they are number 2 industrial power after USA. After they have social welfare, they virtually build nothing in UK anymore. Social welfare means you take money from business and give them to bums. Figure out what happen to the industry who are taxes to the hill to pay for social welfare. They go out of business.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
I would not go all out to write off the concept of social welfare, because there is much ambiguity about what it entails. For instance I would consider polyclinics, public education and public housing to be social equalizers, hence 'welfare'. The next person might think otherwise or another might include a different permutation of items in the basket.

With regards to unemployment benefits, I think you made a case about bums living on 'life support' their whole life. I agree that extensive coverage (or badly administered ones) will create disincentives to living a useful, productive life. I think it is reasonable that companies should compensate for loss of office, and that is sufficient in most cases. This makes more sense than having the state (and by extension, the general economy) pay for the company's mistake of hiring someone unsuitable for the role.

Increasingly however we hear more companies and even our government agencies offering contract employment over a fixed term, say 1 or 2 years with option to convert. We should recognize that the decision to convert may not be related to performance, and the worker may not find ready employment immediately in the market, AND a gratuity at the end of tenure is not mandatory or stated at the commencement of the contract.

So while unemployment benefits may be difficult to implement well, we should recognize that even if the prevalence of contract work is a global phenomena, and the option of offering contract work motivates employers to hire on anticipation of increased workload, this uncertainty is an unfair and undesirable outcome for the contract worker.

We should recognize that, if you were 20 today, that person could be YOU.

We need to consider if legislation is required to respond to this phenomena. Just because a contract was formed on mutual consent doesn't mean that it is fair and just.

Which is why some of the murmurs of discontent from another thread in the politics folder has caused some discomfort for me. If both parties act blur, both fuck care, nobody talks about this. Just how does WP live up to their "Workers" label anyway?
 

Ramseth

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Before UK have social welfare, they are number 2 industrial power after USA. After they have social welfare, they virtually build nothing in UK anymore. Social welfare means you take money from business and give them to bums. Figure out what happen to the industry who are taxes to the hill to pay for social welfare. They go out of business.

Still ranking 4th last time I checked.
 

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
What i see here is a sinkie moron shouting social welfare is so evil. Better not to have it or else everyone is screwed. Come on lah, your sinkies are still being screwed in whatever fare they have. Why? Because they are balless cowards. Cowards are screwed, no matter where they are or in what situation.

You claimed shows extreme naiveity and immaturity. You can carry on your rant and i look forward to se how much you are disgracing yourself.
 

hairylee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Like everywhere else in this world, the Brit's forefathers work hard to so as to be able to provide a education and a better life for their children.
Their children studied hard so as to be able to have a better life their forefathers wished for them.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
There is a no doubt the systemis flawed but appropriate welfare intervention and framework should still present.

If there is a simple condition where one can only be eligible for welfare after working for minimum of 20 years,it will be a goodstart.
 

neddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
When you gave the people social welfare, you cannot take it back. Any gov in UK would want to tweak it will be kick out in the next election, it is a vicious cycle. Why you want social welfare so much, so you can seat at home like a bum and surf the net the whole days right?

Yes you can. Australia keeps "fine-tuning" the welfare system.

Before UK have social welfare, they are number 2 industrial power after USA. After they have social welfare, they virtually build nothing in UK anymore. Social welfare means you take money from business and give them to bums. Figure out what happen to the industry who are taxes to the hill to pay for social welfare. They go out of business.

My thoughts. Welfare has nothing to do with the UK losing its Industrial power.
British brands are now foreign owned because they cannot keep up. The English-speaking world enbraced deregulation, service, banks and finance. Strange that Germans, France & Italy are able to keep their manufacturing industries.

In fact, Italy would be in bigger trouble if they had not retained their profitable industries.

These days, the Brits make jokes out of the words, MADE IN THE UK.

My understanding is that it is the middle-class Brits who are taxed for the dole, not the businesses.
 
Last edited:
Top