- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
- Points
- 113
The former prime minister seems to suggest there is a switching cost from a PAP government to a non-PAP government. The cost is the loss of confidence in policies and institutions.
So, the quick analogy is if there is a switch of government, it will lead to a loss of confidence and as a result Singapore will be less successful.
The question is who are to decide the confidence in policies and institutions. The citizens and the voters of course. If they have no confidence in PAP policies and the institutions (taking instructions from the PAP), they will be willing to pay the switching cost.
However, every citizen will have his or her own calculation of the switching cost. It cannot be the same.
The confidence has to come from the people, not investors, especially foreign investors who have no right to build the local confidence.
The PAP is warning Singaporeans there is a price to pay. The switching cost is very high and “It will be very stupid of us to shake that confidence.
- http://pijitailai.blogspot.sg/2013/03/switching-cost-and-confidence-in.html
So, the quick analogy is if there is a switch of government, it will lead to a loss of confidence and as a result Singapore will be less successful.
The question is who are to decide the confidence in policies and institutions. The citizens and the voters of course. If they have no confidence in PAP policies and the institutions (taking instructions from the PAP), they will be willing to pay the switching cost.
However, every citizen will have his or her own calculation of the switching cost. It cannot be the same.
The confidence has to come from the people, not investors, especially foreign investors who have no right to build the local confidence.
The PAP is warning Singaporeans there is a price to pay. The switching cost is very high and “It will be very stupid of us to shake that confidence.
- http://pijitailai.blogspot.sg/2013/03/switching-cost-and-confidence-in.html