Lky warned HK in 1989

[syed putra]

Who really started tge new industrial revolution in china? It was the hongkies.
Before shenzhen, all sorts of gadgets and toys and shoes were made in hong kong.
Deng xiao peng entice them to move to shenzhen. The result is astounding.the pearl river delta (prd) has the biggest economy in china. World bank consider prd as worlds biggest megacity with 105 million people.
Equally important to note is that the Pearl River Delta is one of the world’s most successful economies. Its GDP, at more than $1.2 trillion, is bigger than that of Indonesia. It has been growing at an average rate of 12% a year for the past decade. As a global trading partner, the region is outranked only by the US and Germany. For China, the PRD is critical. Though accounting for less than 1% of the country’s territory and just 5% of its total population, the PRD generates more than 10% of its GDP and a quarter of its exports and has attracted more than a trillion dollars-worth of foreign direct investment.

Now let us see what sinkie has contributed to its neigbours. Nothing or not very much. So sinkie has no right criticise hongkies. They have given their fare share. China would not be as developed without contribution from hong kong.

 

[Patriot]

Why he can see everywhere except own backyard?

Actually, he is no different from many politicians.

Most of them are full of hot air.

 

[Valium]

Actually, he is no different from many politicians.

Most of them are full of hot air.

Talk cock is free.

 

[tanwahtiu]

Bruce lee image Honkies still think they are great Pommie sperm suckers...

 

[zeebjii]

Sad to say,,that is what Hong Kong needs to maybe gain its independence..

I like a quote from this movie,,,there is no independence because no one has died..

LOL, when was HK EVER independent?

 

[laksaboy]

LOL, when was HK EVER independent?

He said gain independence, not regain independence.

 

[eatshitndie]

hongkies had the chance to seek for independence in 1960 when u.n. granted self-determination to colonies and former colonies with the resolution “declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples.” and this was before the prc regime was recognized as the "legitimate" representative of china to the u.n. (resolution 2758) on november 23, 1971, ousting the roc regime from both its security council seat and representation in the u.n. altogether. the general assembly passed resolution 2758 and security council voted against roc in favor of prc on that same fateful day. by 1972, a year after prc regime was inducted to the u.n. as sole legitimate china representative and permanent security council member, it was (legitimately) too late for hk and macau to seek independence as prc also tabled resolution 2908 to the u.n. and obtained a 99:5 u.n. general assembly vote [to classify hk and macau "as part of chinese territory occupied by the british and portuguese authorities" and not as "colonies"].

whatever joshua wong and jeffrey ngo claimed in their hkfp article as "distorted history" is bs as both hongkies and macaucas had their chance in the late 50s and early 60s to seek independence from the british and portuguese respectively, but failed or refused to do so due to their own stupidity and lack of foresight, vision, awareness. hongkies and macaucas had also believed that roc would remain as sole representative of china in the u.n. at both the general assembly and security council for as long as they enjoy their dim sum, gambling, race tracks, mahjong, prostitution, money making. by doing so before prc became "legitimate" in the u.n. and permanent security council member, hongkies and macaucas at least had the chance to "secede" from china and seek their complete independence around the same time when other euro-colonized cuntries (india, malaya and indonesia included) were doing so in the late 50s and early 60s, notwithstanding that roc might thwart their attempts as roc also had designs on hk and macau, and would want hk and macau to be eventually part of roc, as they had also revealed their coveted plans for mongolia. that prc engineered a coup in the u.n. in 1972 after becoming permanent security council member in 1971 to strip hk and macau off as "colonies" was no fluke and coincidence as the resolution paved the way for prc to "legitimately" regain hk and macau as their own territories. hongkies and macaucas should have seen this cumming and counter subtle but deadly chess moves with more subtle and winning chess moves in the 50s and 60s. but no, these gongkias would remain happily blind, prefer to suck british and portuguese cocks, and proudly call themselves "british (and portuguese) subjects".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_and_the_United_Nations

https://www.hongkongfp.com/2016/11/...ht-self-determination-1972-distorted-history/

ps:[added text]

 

[zeebjii]

hongkies had the chance to seek for independence in 1960 when u.n. granted self-determination to colonies and former colonies with the resolution “declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples.” and this was before the prc regime was recognized as the "legitimate" representative of china to the u.n. (resolution 2758) on november 23, 1971, ousting the roc regime from both its security council seat and representation in the u.n. altogether. the general assembly passed resolution 2758 and security council voted against roc in favor of prc on that same fateful day. by 1972, a year after prc regime was inducted to the u.n. as sole legitimate china representative and permanent security council member, it was (legitimately) too late for hk and macau to seek independence as prc also tabled resolution 2908 to the u.n. and obtained a 99:5 u.n. general assembly vote.

whatever joshua wong and jeffrey ngo claimed in their hkfp article as "distorted history" is bs as both hongkies and macaucas had their chance in the late 50s and early 60s to seek independence from the british and portuguese respectively, but failed or refused to do so due to their own stupidity and lack of foresight, vision, awareness. hongkies and macaucas had also believed that roc would remain as sole representative of china in the u.n. at both the general assembly and security council for as long as they enjoy their dim sum, gambling, race tracks, mahjong, prostitution, money making. by doing so before prc became "legitimate" in the u.n. and permanent security council member, hongkies and macaucas at least had the chance to "secede" from china and seek their complete independence around the same time when other euro-colonized cuntries (india, malaya and indonesia included) were doing so in the late 50s and early 60s, notwithstanding that roc might thwart their attempts as roc also had designs on hk and macau, and would want hk and macau to be eventually part of roc, as they had also revealed their coveted plans for mongolia. that prc engineered a coup in the u.n. in 1972 after becoming permanent security council member in 1971 to strip hk and macau off as "colonies" was no fluke and coincidence as the resolution paved the way for prc to "legitimately" regain hk and macau as their own territories. hongkies and macaucas should have seen this cumming and counter subtle but deadly chess moves with more subtle and winning chess moves in the 50s and 60s. but no, these gongkias would remain happily blind, prefer to suck british and portuguese cocks, and proudly call themselves "british (and portuguese) subjects".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_and_the_United_Nations

https://www.hongkongfp.com/2016/11/...ht-self-determination-1972-distorted-history/

The hongkies were not stupid. I don't think they ever wanted independence. They'd rather be slaves and have ZERO freedom under the angmos than SOME freedom under the chinks. The closest local equivalent is the SPG.

 

[eatshitndie]

The hongkies were not stupid. I don't think they ever wanted independence. They'd rather be slaves and have ZERO freedom under the angmos than SOME freedom under the chinks. The closest local equivalent is the SPG.

that's why sinkies are lucky to have had an lky. otherwise, no foresight, no vision, no future like hongkies. and kena absorbed and enslaved by either mudlaysia, indonesia, or even cheena. spgs' will cry foul if kena absorbed by any sexcept angmoh cuntries.

 

[rocket]

This weekend tanks starts rolling in.

 

[tanwahtiu]

Anyway, short arse people are born stupid and dumb human... they can only see arse view blocked by arses...

 

[AhMeng]

hongkies had the chance to seek for independence in 1960 when u.n. granted self-determination to colonies and former colonies with the resolution “declaration on the granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples.” and this was before the prc regime was recognized as the "legitimate" representative of china to the u.n. (resolution 2758) on november 23, 1971, ousting the roc regime from both its security council seat and representation in the u.n. altogether. the general assembly passed resolution 2758 and security council voted against roc in favor of prc on that same fateful day. by 1972, a year after prc regime was inducted to the u.n. as sole legitimate china representative and permanent security council member, it was (legitimately) too late for hk and macau to seek independence as prc also tabled resolution 2908 to the u.n. and obtained a 99:5 u.n. general assembly vote.

whatever joshua wong and jeffrey ngo claimed in their hkfp article as "distorted history" is bs as both hongkies and macaucas had their chance in the late 50s and early 60s to seek independence from the british and portuguese respectively, but failed or refused to do so due to their own stupidity and lack of foresight, vision, awareness. hongkies and macaucas had also believed that roc would remain as sole representative of china in the u.n. at both the general assembly and security council for as long as they enjoy their dim sum, gambling, race tracks, mahjong, prostitution, money making. by doing so before prc became "legitimate" in the u.n. and permanent security council member, hongkies and macaucas at least had the chance to "secede" from china and seek their complete independence around the same time when other euro-colonized cuntries (india, malaya and indonesia included) were doing so in the late 50s and early 60s, notwithstanding that roc might thwart their attempts as roc also had designs on hk and macau, and would want hk and macau to be eventually part of roc, as they had also revealed their coveted plans for mongolia. that prc engineered a coup in the u.n. in 1972 after becoming permanent security council member in 1971 to strip hk and macau off as "colonies" was no fluke and coincidence as the resolution paved the way for prc to "legitimately" regain hk and macau as their own territories. hongkies and macaucas should have seen this cumming and counter subtle but deadly chess moves with more subtle and winning chess moves in the 50s and 60s. but no, these gongkias would remain happily blind, prefer to suck british and portuguese cocks, and proudly call themselves "british (and portuguese) subjects".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_and_the_United_Nations

https://www.hongkongfp.com/2016/11/...ht-self-determination-1972-distorted-history/

wow...well said.

 

[tanwahtiu]

LKY was stating the obvious....

 

[rocket]

HONG KONG: Protesters on Friday (Jul 26) kicked off a demonstration at Hong Kong International Airport to draw international visitors' attention to a controversial extradition Bill.

Armed with placards and flyers, hundreds of people crowded into the airport's arrivals hall to protest against police violence during the rallies, as chants of "Free Hong Kong" reverberated in the building


Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...t-arrival-departure-extradition-bill-11755882

 

[rocket]

They also called for an investigation into the police's apparently slow response after pro-democracy demonstrators and commuters were attacked by thugs at a Mass Transit Railway (MTR) station in Yuen Long last Sunday.

At least 45 people were sent to the hospital after the incident.

IAProtesters rally at Hong Kong airport over controversial extradition Bill


Protesters rally at Hong Kong airport over controversial extradition Bill



Protesters demonstrate against the controversial extradition Bill at Hong Kong airport. (Photo: Twitter/serika_sino)

26 Jul 2019 01:59PM(Updated: 26 Jul 2019 04:13PM)

Share this content

61 shares

Bookmark

HONG KONG: Protesters on Friday (Jul 26) kicked off a demonstration at Hong Kong International Airport to draw international visitors' attention to a controversial extradition Bill.

Armed with placards and flyers, hundreds of people crowded into the airport's arrivals hall to protest against police violence during the rallies, as chants of "Free Hong Kong" reverberated in the building.

READ: Hong Kong airport deploys 'extra manpower' after protesters flood into arrivals hall

They also called for an investigation into the police's apparently slow response after pro-democracy demonstrators and commuters were attacked by thugs at a Mass Transit Railway (MTR) station in Yuen Long last Sunday.

At least 45 people were sent to the hospitalafter the incident.

Advertisement

"The world has been watching us in the past few weeks," said Jeremy Tam, a former pilot and lawmaker who helped organise the protest with other aviation sector employees.

"We simply believe that the airport is the most direct way for all tourists to explain what is happening in Hong Kong."

Police granted approval for the rally at the airport, but banned another protest planned for Sunday in Yuen Long. Organisers of this weekend's protest said they would go ahead with their march despite the ban


Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...t-arrival-departure-extradition-bill-11755882
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...t-arrival-departure-extradition-bill-11755882

 

[rocket]

S’poreans advised to avoid Hong Kong airport, border town due to ongoing protests: MFA

Stay safe, Singaporeans.

Belmont Lay | July 26, 10:35 am



Singaporeans are advised to avoid travelling to Hong Kong’s airport and the rural town of Yuen Long due to upcoming planned protests to be held in these areas over the weekend.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) issued a travel advisory on Friday, July 26, urging Singaporeans to avoid the Hong Kong International Airport and Yuen Long in the New Territories.

What protesters are planning

Pro-democracy activists are planning to protest inside Hong Kong’s airport arrival gates on Friday.

Activists are also planning to hold a protest on Saturday in Yuen Long.

This was where a gang of men in white t-shirts assaulted protesters on Sunday, July 21 in a Mass Transit Railway (MTR) station and on a train, resulting in at least 45 people to be sent to hospital.

A series of marches are to be held on Sunday.

 

[Hypocrite-The]

He said gain independence, not regain independence.

Some ppl cant read

 

[Hypocrite-The]

S’poreans advised to avoid Hong Kong airport, border town due to ongoing protests: MFA

Stay safe, Singaporeans.

Belmont Lay | July 26, 10:35 am



Singaporeans are advised to avoid travelling to Hong Kong’s airport and the rural town of Yuen Long due to upcoming planned protests to be held in these areas over the weekend.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) issued a travel advisory on Friday, July 26, urging Singaporeans to avoid the Hong Kong International Airport and Yuen Long in the New Territories.

What protesters are planning

Pro-democracy activists are planning to protest inside Hong Kong’s airport arrival gates on Friday.

Activists are also planning to hold a protest on Saturday in Yuen Long.

This was where a gang of men in white t-shirts assaulted protesters on Sunday, July 21 in a Mass Transit Railway (MTR) station and on a train, resulting in at least 45 people to be sent to hospital.

A series of marches are to be held on Sunday.

I stay in Tin Shui Wai whenever I am in HK,,,is it safe to stay there? Besides the worry at the airport which I cannot avoid,,,,