• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

LHY rants about son being prosecuted by AGC

Well said. Singapore courts are impartial and will not hesitate to commence proceedings against any individual who has broken the law regardless of their position in life and who they are related to.

This is the hallmark of a fair and just judicial system.

Only the foolish believes that sinkapore courts do not kowtow to the PAP.
 
I just wondered why LHY keep whining and whining about his son situation and AG.
The only right thing to do is to step out and get himself elected, save his sons from his evil clutches of LHL.

The only thing i can see is that LHY is a ball less ... Any loving father would stand out and keep his sons and daughters safe from any danger. But i think being Ball less is one of the trait of LKY family.

And LHL is another ball Less and he is a Bastard gia.... How could he as an Uncle Sue his own nephew and uses the whole Parliament and state resources to pressure his sibling into submission. Now he is using State resources to sue his own Nephew ?

Come on. LHL is behaving like some thugs.
 
1 pail of water can actually put out this fire.... but you guys out there threw oil instead... :roflmao: :roflmao:
stirred arh.. stirred arh.. :cool:
 
Well said. Singapore courts are impartial and will not hesitate to commence proceedings against any individual who has broken the law regardless of their position in life and who they are related to.

This is the hallmark of a fair and just judicial system.

IMG_2456.GIF
 
Which international newspaper had recently said that our singapore judiciary is not independent? Hsien Yang should cite his sources.
 
1 pail of water can actually put out this fire.... but you guys out there threw oil instead... :roflmao::roflmao:
stirred arh.. stirred arh.. :cool:

When a person tries to provide data information to account and rationalise, others should look at the hidden agenda behind the act. The fire was started by the famiLEE member holding the torch? No amount of water in Singapore can extinguish the burning rage. The torch bearer intentionalLEE chose to add more fuel and ralLEEd his accompLEEces to fan the flames?

Yes, this raging fire is a concern to Singaporeans. DirectLEE or indirectLEE, it concerns the future of Singapore. However, Singaporeans can only be mere concerned bystanders and interested spectators at this juncture. SeriousLEE, is this a private famiLEE matter or a matter that concerns and involves all Singaporeans - our country's Torch and Torch bearer, present and future?
 
When a person tries to provide data information to account and rationalise, others should look at the hidden agenda behind the act. The fire was started by the famiLEE member holding the torch? No amount of water in Singapore can extinguish the burning rage. The torch bearer intentionalLEE chose to add more fuel and ralLEEd his accompLEEces to fan the flames?

Yes, this raging fire is a concern to Singaporeans. DirectLEE or indirectLEE, it concerns the future of Singapore. However, Singaporeans can only be mere concerned bystanders and interested spectators at this juncture. SeriousLEE, is this a private famiLEE matter or a matter that concerns and involves all Singaporeans - our country's Torch and Torch bearer, present and future?

Fake BG vs Fake BG and clever nephew.
 
Skip Navigation
Jump to Main Main navigation and Meta Navigation
To Home
Meta Main Navigation
OpenAll SectionsAll SectionsClose
Court of Appeal allows Li Shengwu to appeal in contempt of court case
Singapore
Court of Appeal allows Li Shengwu to appeal in contempt of court case
image: 
FILE PHOTO: Li Shengwu, nephew of Singapore's prime minister, is seen in Cambridge, Massachuse
FILE PHOTO: Li Shengwu, nephew of Singapore's prime minister, is seen in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S. August 12, 2017. REUTERS/Tim McLaughlin/File Photo
By Lydia Lam
03 Sep 2018 05:46PM
(Updated: 03 Sep 2018 05:56PM)
Share this content




Bookmark

SINGAPORE: The Court of Appeal on Monday (Sep 3) gave the green light to Mr Li Shengwu to appeal against a previous decision that allowed the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) to serve papers on him outside Singapore, relating to a contempt of court case.

The nephew of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is being sued by the AGC for allegedly saying in a Facebook post last July that Singapore has a "pliant court system", and that the Singapore Government was "very litigious".

Advertisement
The High Court had in March dismissed Mr Li’s application to set aside the court order allowing the AGC to go ahead to serve the documents.

Mr Li, who lives in the United States, applied to appeal the High Court's decision and it was granted on Monday by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, along with Judges of Appeal Judith Prakash and Steven Chong.

The appeal will be heard at a date to be decided, but Chief Justice Menon said it would be expedited.

He added that questions which should be addressed during the appeal include whether the court has the right to exercise jurisdiction over someone who commits contempt of court, but who is overseas when court proceedings start, and if it does, what statutes this is based on.

Advertisement
"If the defendant is in Singapore, I don't think there is an issue because of inherent jurisdiction," said the Chief Justice. "But the problem comes when the defendant is not within Singapore."

Mr Li's defence lawyer, Abraham Vergis from Providence Law Asia, took issue with the prosecutor's use of a particular section of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act, saying that jurisdiction for contempt of court "was never founded" on that section.

Chief Justice Menon said Mr Vergis raised "a legitimate question that needs to be considered".

"Is there jurisdiction over a (person who commits contempt of court but is overseas)? If there is, what is the jurisdiction," he said.

Speaking for the three judges in the Court of Appeal, the Chief Justice said: "All three of us think this should be expedited. It is important both for clarifications of law and for the defendant."

Mr Li, 33, previously said he does not intend to return to Singapore.

He shared a post on Facebook over the weekend, indicating that he has started a new job at Harvard University as Assistant Professor of Economics.

LEE HSIEN YANG QUESTIONS AGC’S ACTIONS AGAINST HIS SON

The Facebook comments made by Mr Li that were allegedly in contempt of court were posted on the back of a public spat between his father Lee Hsien Yang, his aunt Lee Wei Ling and PM Lee.

The dispute revolved around the future of the family home at 38 Oxley Road, which belonged to the siblings’ late father, Singapore’s founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew.

Hours before the Court of Appeal’s decision on Monday, Mr Lee Hsien Yang questioned the AGC’s actions against his son.

“Much stronger criticism of Singapore courts has recently been published in some international media and widely shared public posts.

“AGC appears not to have commenced committal proceedings against the media and others, whilst nonetheless continuing this action against Shengwu for his private communications,” said Mr Lee in a Facebook post.


Source: CNA/ll/(gs)
Tagged Topics
court

Li Shengwu

Lee Hsien Yang
Lee Hsien Loong
Share this content




Bookmark

More stories for you
Li Shengwu’s application to set aside court order dismissed with costs Toggle share menu
Former president Kirchner appears in Argentine court over corruption Toggle share menu
Lee Kuan Yew wanted 38 Oxley Road demolished: Lee Hsien Yang and Lee Wei Ling Toggle share menu
image: https://images.outbrainimg.com/tran...AsImgiOjIwMCwiZCI6MS41LCJjcyI6MCwiZiI6MH0.jpg
1- and 2-room HDB households in North East District to get vouchers for free LED lights | Video
1- and 2-room HDB households in North East District to get vouchers for free LED lights | Video
image: https://images.outbrainimg.com/tran...AsImgiOjIwMCwiZCI6MS41LCJjcyI6MCwiZiI6MH0.jpg
10 Unloved Aussie Mining Stocks That Could Make You a Fortune in 2018
10 Unloved Aussie Mining Stocks That Could Make You a Fortune in 2018
Markets & Money
Recommended by
Get the Channel NewsAsia newsletter in your inbox


Enter your email address
SUBSCRIBE
Advertisement
More information about Channel News Asia
jump to top of page
Sections
Singapore
Asia
World
CNA Insider
Business
Sport
Lifestyle
Technology
Health
Commentary
Podcasts
Video on Demand
ASEAN
About Us
About Channel NewsAsia
Hotel Partners
Events & Seminars
Presenters & Correspondents
Contact Us
Advertise with us
Contact Sales
Online Advertising
TV Advertising
Get the news that matters in your inbox every morning!
Please enter your email address
Enter your email address

I consent to the use of my personal data by Mediacorp and the Mediacorp group of companies (collectively "Mediacorp") to send me marketing and advertising materials in relation to goods and services of Mediacorp and its business partners and for research and analysis
SUBSCRIBE
Follow our news
Experience news with our apps
Play Store
App Store
Copyright© Mediacorp 2018. Mediacorp Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.

Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
image:
image: https://rp.gwallet.com/r1/cm/p46



Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...contempt-of-court-appeal-can-proceed-10679186
 
Should just ut BG vs BG. Who wins wins.

Father taught the son to fight with knuckleduster. Late father was Chief Gangster of Singapore then. He used the teachings and tried out the 'FIT and FIX' on his own FamiLEE.
 
Shocking....an uncle prosecuting his nephew.
 
When a person tries to provide data information to account and rationalise, others should look at the hidden agenda behind the act. The fire was started by the famiLEE member holding the torch? No amount of water. ..

Bro kosong; u agree that the fire was started by a LEE.. and i believe it all has to do with the grandparents home... so what you say ??
.. .. you think spore belong to the famiLEE
 
Only the foolish believes that sinkapore courts do not kowtow to the PAP.

I never can tell where the PAP ends and the Stinkapore courts begin!
To me and all others, they the one and the same same thing.
 
Yes, this raging fire is a concern to Singaporeans. DirectLEE or indirectLEE, it concerns the future of Singapore.

the real concern to sporeans. .. living from pay cheque to pay cheque... stagnant wages... rising cost of living

all the DirectLEEs have had a good and pampered life for the past 30-50 yrs...
what the FARK have they done for this country and sporeans ???
 
Bro kosong; u agree that the fire was started by a LEE.. and i believe it all has to do with the grandparents home... so what you say ??
.. .. you think spore belong to the famiLEE

Singapore belongs to Singaporeans.
Singapore does not belong to an individual, a family or a political party.

FamiLEEs and LEEders come and go.
Singapore leaders are elected by Singaporeans to help govern the country, on behalf of the PEOPLE, over a fixed term.
The
People's Action Party [PAP] does not represent Singaporeans.
The
People in PAP is NOT synonymous or representation of the citizens, as in the PEOPLE of Singapore.
[A crafty play on words by the founders of the PAP]
 
I never can tell where the PAP ends and the Stinkapore courts begin!
To me and all others, they the one and the same same thing.

It ends when the PEOPLE of Singapore collectively decide to end it. The problem is WHEN and we are back with the same dilemma.
The Singularity of ThinkALL.
 
the real concern to sporeans. .. living from pay cheque to pay cheque... stagnant wages... rising cost of living

all the DirectLEEs have had a good and pampered life for the past 30-50 yrs...
what the FARK have they done for this country and sporeans ???

Your observations are true of present day Singapore. Sad but true.
It's not the DONE FOR but the DONE TO.
DONE FOR is when THEY want to convince.
DONE TO is what many Singaporeans are asking.

What have THEY DONE TO Singapore and Singaporeans?
 
When the people ask "What have THEY DONE FOR the country and people?"
... there is a need to wait for the LEEder to respond. Therefore, the famiLEE would come and cry father-cry mother. Following, it would be the followers and supporters with their 'I know everything' actions and reactions. Resultant effect is opinions sway. The YOU could need to be on the defensive side.

When the question asked is "
What have THEY DONE TO the country and people?"
... the people would start looking for answers, usually from their own experiences before spreading out to other people. There is no need to wait for anyone to respond. The YOU and the We would be on the offensive...and the resulting effect could be
THEY ARE DONE FOR!
 
Back
Top