• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Letter from Lee Hsien Loong Prime Minister

MarrickG

Alfrescian
Loyal
It was a pleasure working with him

showimageCC.aspx



Dear Mdm Chandramohan Nirmala,

I am deeply saddened by the passing of your husband, Mr Chandramohan.

Mr Chandramohan was a long-time veteran of the broadcasting industry. He was a professional with a fine political sense, a good understanding of the issues of the day as well as keen insight into the medium, of what would work on TV. He produced the TV press conference that Minister Mentor gave on Aug 9, 1965, when Singapore separated from Malaysia. He pioneered programmes like Talking Point, Friday Background and Diary of a Nation. For many years he supervised the production of the annual National Day Rallies and coverage of our General Elections.

I got to know Chandra in the 1980s, when he was in charge of current affairs in Singapore Broadcasting Corporation (SBC), which evolved into present-day MediaCorp. We needed to use TV more for explaining and discussing current affairs and political issues, in order to reach out to and engage a more educated public. SBC launched a Today in Parliament programme. This was a most demanding exercise: To distil a long and complex debate lasting hours into 45 minutes of watchable television to be broadcast the same night. We had never televised Parliament debates before. Chandra personally oversaw the production of these programmes, and made sure that they were coherent and balanced.

SBC also did special programmes on the issues of the day, such as our economic competitiveness or the falling fertility rate. The programmes had to present issues objectively and credibly, deal forthrightly with tough questions, and very importantly hold the viewers' attention. In short they had to inform, educate and entertain Singaporeans. Chandra always understood what we needed to get across, and could be relied upon to propose the best way to do so.

Chandra produced a few shows that I participated in. I remember one studio discussion that had gone well, and overrun the targeted time. I remarked to Chandra that it would be hard to compress the material, since it all seemed relevant. But with his greater experience, he replied that by looking closely at the transcript, he would identify sections to edit out, which would tighten and improve the programme. Of course he was right. It was a pleasure working with him.

Chandra continued to help us even after he retired from MediaCorp. His experience and professional judgment were too valuable to be left untapped. One of the last projects he did was a series of on-the-shelf programmes about prominent Singaporeans for use upon their passing away. His own passing will be felt by all his many colleagues and friends.
 

Teo Kok Eng

Alfrescian
Loyal
No signoff??

Think you may have neglect to cut and paste the "Yours Sincerely" part.

I will take your word that it is a letter from Lee Hsien Loong.
 

rodent2005

Alfrescian
Loyal
I know one fool proof way of compressing material is to delete anything that features the opposition favourably, neutrally or objectively.
 

lockeliberal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Dear Marrick

G Yeo on his Facebook in his comments on the passing of Chandranmohan refers to him as a colleague

I find it strange as a comment due to the fact that G Yeo career as a soldier and Chandran,s work as a journalist would have ensured that their paths would never have crossed as colleagues.

I do wonder was it a party colleague he was referring to or hinting at. Older and more in the loop forummers are free to comment.



Locke
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Dear Marrick

G Yeo on his Facebook in his comments on the passing of Chandranmohan refers to him as a colleague

I find it strange as a comment due to the fact that G Yeo career as a soldier and Chandran,s work as a journalist would have ensured that their paths would never have crossed as colleagues.

I do wonder was it a party colleague he was referring to or hinting at. Older and more in the loop forummers are free to comment.



Locke

They were into durians...you spread one open...you see the yellow fleshy insides that maketh your mouth water, & the smell is irristable...that is where their path crossed & became colleagues...as soldier & a journalist...where they spread open the 'durian'...aha!...that is a secret...:biggrin:
 

Redress

Alfrescian
Loyal
Me
To [email protected][email protected][email protected]_​[email protected][email protected][email protected]_Feedback​[email protected][email protected]@[email protected].​[email protected]
Today at 9:07 AM
2nd Jan 2014
To: The Public Prosecutor
Attorney-General’s Chambers
Dear Sirs,
RE: Re-Appeal to take Action Against (this person) Nric No: S25XXXXXX
1. Thank you for your letter dated 27 December 2013 Reference No: AG/CJD/10/200/2012/81
2. First and foremost, I would like to apologize for writing this final letter with regards to the above-mentioned matter. I am indeed very surprised to your past several reply that the prosecution’s position remains unchanged to take no further action against (this Person) and my list of Particulars and doubts as follows:-

a) I am Mr Chua and do solemnly swear and affirm that I am speaking the truth and nothing else. I am also willing to stand trial and testify on (this person) wrong doing for using someone driving license to deduct a 12 demerit points for speeding a Traffic Light Camera at the junction of Lavender Street and Serangoon Road on 16/6/2011 Report No: 113029596512 driving my company vehicle No: GQXXXXX
b) When I realized that Mr Ong took this rap for (this person), I being the company precedent partner had done my duty to report to the authority concern (Traffic Police) since Ong is not an employee
c) As GQXXXXX is a registered company vehicle, I have duly reported the matter to LTA for (this person) using Mr Ong’s driving License to deduct this 12 demerit points
d) The fact to which Traffic Police and LTA are two different government agencies and “if” lets say Ong is the said driver committing the offence, then (this person) had already committed an offence for lending someone who is not an employee to drive the said company vehicle GQXXXXX in which LTA’s Letter had clearly stress and stated that Company Vehicle is solely to be used only for the said registered company businesses and no Personal usage to it. May I ask why you and your office still take no action on this?
e) Notwithstanding the fact that the concerned 12 demerit points and fine had been paid, Does this imply that the case is closed? Once again, I being the precedent partner cannot just simply coved up for (this person) and “if” again lets say on the day itself this GQXXXXX killed somebody on the road while speeding a Traffic Light Camera and knock down a pedestrian then who is going to account it? Of course that said vehicle belongs to the registered company and the said registered company owner has to answer right? Then may I ask again as to why I, being the precedent partner here and my reporting statement are being cast to one side?
f) Next, I have gather concrete evidences and had reported to ACRA that (this person) had been using a bookshop receipt book to issue receipt without a company name, address and contact number to his customers and that already had infringed the Company Acts, under section 144. And I would also like to know Why again you and your good office still take no action against (this person)?
g) Lastly, I would also like to state that it was because these wrong-doings that I have reported against (this person) to the relevant authorities and (this person) did threaten to break my hand or leg and I have also duly make a police report on this matter and had also laid a Magistrate Complain

Despite the fact that (this person) and I are now still on an On-Going civil sue and I hereby declare that I am not abusing this channel for my civil sue and gain advantage or favorably in doing so. I am merely doing a citizen duty and as a precedent partner and nothing else. I therefore sincerely urge you and your good office can re-open the investigation and I am willing to accept punishment should I had gave any false information.

Thank you and best regards.




Yours faithfully,

_____________________
Mr Chua
 

Redress

Alfrescian
Loyal
Tele-Conversation between myself and Traffic Police ASP Mike Ting to expose my ex-business partner who had bribed someone to be a scapegoat for his 12 demerit points.

At that point of time, my ex-partner had committed 2 offences which were

1)using his mobile phone talking while driving and got caught by the TP (2X12 Points) and

2)Parking illegally at a zig-zag double yellow line near simpang bedok and got slapped with a 4 demerit points.

Total: 28 points and "if" that 12 points were to be accumulated here, just imagine within a short span of less than 3 months, a driver had accumulated 40 demerit Points.Do you honestly think that the Court will mete out a measly $800 fine and a 4 months driving suspension?Drivers,feel free to comment.

CHUA: Sir, May i know why Mr Ong is able to drive my company registered vehicle when he is obviously not an employee at all.Furthermore, the offence of beating a Traffic Light on 16/6/2011 at the Junction of Lavender Street and Serangoon Road is accounted for by Ong and not my ex-business partner Goh.I find this deeply ironic when Goh was the driver who transgressed the traffic laws knowingly by beating the traffic light.

ASP: anyone also can drive a vehicle so long he/she had a driving licence...

Chua: Sir, I question the fact that Ong was registered as the driver of the company's vehicle in the offence record form when he is clearly not a recognized employee of the company. In accordance to the LTA rules, company registered vehicles are solely to be used for the company staff and it's company businesses activities and not for personal usage right?

ASP: i have been in office for more than 20 Years and i know all of the laws and regulation governing our Singapore Road at the back of my hands.

CHUA: Sir, but this is already an infringement of the rules and regulation of LTA! An analogy would be like if we only possess a normal driver license and not a Taxi-vocational license,are we permitted to drive taxi?

ASP: But, the one we are referring here is a van.

ME: But Sir, that's a company registered van and a personal who is not an employee should not be allowed to drive the van as it is a obvious breach of law right?

ASP: i do not wish to comment over the phone and you come and see me on the coming Monday then we discuss further on the matter

Chua: Duly Noted. But Sir, i would like to affirm what i have spoke is the truth. I only wish to fulfil my duties as a law-abiding citizen and bring my ex partner illicit actions to light.

ASP: Any one also can "soon-pah" that he/ she is stating the truth and i cannot just judge based on your unilateral claim.

Chua: Fair enough, I would like to question the fact that TP is so certain that ong is the driver then?Assuming the TP has done a complete investigation in this case, would i bother to persist in my complaints?

ASP: We have submitted your report to the AGC for direction and our stand remains firm in not taking any action against Mr Goh who is (your ex-partner)

Chua: Sir, can i get a report on the investigation statement?

ASP: No! Even lawyer or the Court cannot have our investigation statement as "they" are classified.

Chua: Then i would wish to challenge the point that TP is adamant about the fact that Ong was the driver who flouted the traffic law.

ASP: i do not wish to continue this conversation any further. Please do come and see me on the coming Monday.

Chua: Okay Sir
 
Top