Bro pls be more discerning. FYI sg doesn't just consist of chinese.
Please forgive me if I've caused any misunderstanding; it was not my intention, and it didn't occur to me, at the time of my post, that anyone could have misunderstood me.
Anyway, please allow me to clarify what I meant when I said:
"Essentially, the Government of Singapore has simply been LUCKY to inherit a bunch of "kiasee" Singaporean Chinese human beings since Singapore's independence in 1965."
I simply meant that the Chinese majority in Singapore, since Singapore's independence in 1965, have been PRIMARILY responsible for putting PAP in power; I did NOT mean that they were the ONLY ones responsible, because obviously, some members of the minority races have also voted for the PAP.
The minorities are just as responsible for putting PAP in power.
But this is where I'm afraid I have to disagree with you.
I'm honestly unable to understand how the minority races in Singapore are
"just as" responsible as the Chinese for putting PAP into power.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I dare say that in many constituencies, since 1965, even if all the Indian and Malay votes for the PAP were NOT counted, the PAP would still have won those constituencies; am I mistaken?
Also if what you mentioned on the PAP is true then it's not a racial issue at all. Anyone regardless of race if brought up in PAP type of environment would be kiasee. The way you are writing it it's like cos of the majority chinese here
brought up to be kiasee by the PAP has managed to keep pap in power while if let's say the majority race here was ang moh or malay or indian etc and brought up in a pap environment of all of sudden they wouldn't be kiasee?
Once again, sorry if I've caused any misunderstanding.
But I thought I was very clear when I used the phrase, "LUCKY to
inherit"?
What I meant was that the PAP could, and still can, EASILY bully its Chinese citizens (who were/are the overwhelming majority race among all the CITIZENS) in Singapore because of the bad habit of most Chinese people in Singapore to be "kiasee" in the FIRST place, BEFORE anyone even begins to bully them!
And when I said:
"The PAP form of government would never succeed in any modern Western country."
I simply meant that if a Western government, say the British, were to behave like the PAP government towards British citizens in Britain, that British government would not succeed in Britain because it would be overthrown sooner rather than later, or at least there would be a much higher chance for it to be overthrown in Britain than for the PAP to be overthrown in Singapore.
I did not mean PAP being overthrown if Westerners were the majority race in SINGAPORE.
But in fact, if White Caucasians (and I mean those with Anglo-Saxon ancestry, especially the British) were the majority race (directly replacing the 70+% Chinese) in Singapore, the majority race in the Singapore government would also be White Caucasian, and the name of the ruling party would probably not be "People's Action Party", not to mention the fact that such White Caucasian Cabinet Ministers and high-ranking Civil Servants would probably behave in a MUCH different way towards the 70+% White Caucasian citizens in Singapore.
So in the first place, a so-called "pap environment" would not even exist if the majority race in Singapore has been White Caucasian since 1965 or since after World War 2 ended in 1945.
Being kiasu and kiasee isn't genetic ok.
I totally agree.
There are "kiasu" and "kiasee" people in every race in the world.
But it just so happens that most East Asians, especially Chinese (and even more especially southern Chinese from China, who are the ancestors of Southeast Asian Chinese, such as Singaporeans), are more obviously "kiasee" than other East Asian races.
It's not caused by genes, but being "kiasee" and "kiasu" just happen to be two of the main aspects of Chinese culture in East Asia, which has been deep-rooted for the past, say, few thousand years?