No one with a clear mind should support the NEW Aware team. They are trying to paint the old team as evil. A smearing campaign. Don't believe what they same. If u support the new team, you would be misled. One undeniable fact is that nine out the twelve exco members comes from the same church. An concerted evil effort. I condemn them..these taliaban.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
LEAKED email of Dr Alan Chin bashing MOE for promoting homosexuality in schools!!
- Thread starter Avantas
- Start date
No one with a clear mind should support the NEW Aware team. They are trying to paint the old team as evil. A smearing campaign. Don't believe what they same. If u support the new team, you would be misled. One undeniable fact is that nine out the twelve exco members comes from the same church. An concerted evil effort. I condemn them..these taliaban.
Z
Zombie
Guest
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/426252/1/.html
Controversial content in AWARE's sex education programme sparks debate
By Alicia Wong, Lin Yanqin & Ester Ng, TODAY | Posted: 01 May 2009 0823 hrs
SINGAPORE: The debate over the sexuality education programme by the Association of Women for Action and Research boils down to a 15-minute segment of its three-hour workshop, TODAY has learnt after obtaining on Wednesday pages of the group’s Comprehensive Sexual Education: Basic Instructor Guide.
The section in question defines terms such as “anal sex”, “virginity”, “teenage pregnancy” and “homosexual”. As part of the workshop exercise, students are asked to associate these terms according to three categories: Positive, neutral and negative.
TODAY had approached AWARE’s old guard to verify the material, after receiving it from a source outside the group, and compared it with hard copies of the actual guide, which has separately been put on the Internet.
The rest of the guide deals with topics such as body image, HIV/Aids, contraception and relationships. But it is the description of terms such as homosexuality and anal sex that appears to be at the heart of the contention raised by self-declared “feminist mentor” and senior lawyer Thio Su Mien.
She took issue with homosexuality being seen as a neutral, not negative, word.
Founding AWARE member and its first president, Lena Cheng, met with TODAY and said that the group had consulted religious groups, academics, social workers and teachers when they adapted the guide from the 25-year-old International Women’s Health Coalition, which promotes and protects girls’ and women’s sexual and reproductive rights and health. “We’re not some feminists who just thought this up,” she said.
AWARE’s former programme manager Deeksha Vasundhra said the definitions are for instructors to facilitate discussions.
The “private and confidential” guide is never given to students, she said.
Students can also place the terms in question in more than one category and they are not pushed to accept certain views.
“I tell trainers, it’s not up to you to teach values. Decisions are made based on family, culture and religion,” she said, and added that children are always advised to speak to their parents or teachers.
Since the material caters to a wide age group, the onus remains on instructors to focus on the relevant topics, said Ms Vasundhra.
AWARE’s 10 trainers are selected for their maturity, open-mindedness and ability to manage young people. They go through a stringent selection process, training sessions and examinations.
One trainer told TODAY, discussions are “very student driven”.
“We basically ask students, ‘what’s your views?’ We don’t say anything, and let them hear all the different ideas... I only make sure everybody respects each other. We don’t believe in imposing any viewpoints,” she said.
During class, trainers use the word “partner” instead of “husband”, for instance, so that lesbian students do not “tune out,” said Ms Vasundhra. Ditto for homosexuality, which is not defined as abnormal so students do not feel excluded.
Ultimately, the aim, said Ms Vasundhra, is to “help kids see that everybody is different and help them to accept that”.
The workshops, conducted by AWARE at 11 secondary schools last year, were fully subsidised thanks to a donation from the Chen Su Lan Trust.
Each workshop cost between S$500 and S$600 but was free for the schools, which have not yet been named publicly.
Former AWARE president Constance Singam revealed to TODAY that S$35,000 out of the S$113,000 donated by the Chen Su Lan Trust last year was spent on the free Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) workshops at schools.
Asked if he was aware of the content of the CSE programme, Reverend Yap Kim Hao, the chairman of the Chen Su Lan Trust, said that he had been given a “rough outline” of the programme, but he had not seen the teaching materials.
When TODAY showed him two pages of the CSE trainers’ manual, which stated that “anal sex can be healthy” and that “homosexuality is perfectly normal”, Rev Yap said that he “had no problems” with the content.
“I recognise there are dissenting views, but these have to be presented and it’s up to the student to make a decision so (the trainer) is not promoting one particular view,” said Rev Yap.
The 80-year-old is a retired Bishop of the Methodist Church here and currently pastoral adviser to the Free Community Church.
TODAY contacted five schools about the programme. Four neither confirmed nor denied if they had the programme, and one said yes but did not reply to queries.
TODAY also showed 13 parents with teenage students the copy of the training material.
While the majority saw the importance of educating their children on sexuality and making the right choices, many also questioned the handling of controversial topics and the explicitness of the material.
“It’s okay to let them know (about sex) but not to this extent. I don’t want my son to learn such explicit things,” said Ms Nor, a mother of three.
Father of six, Rizan Jantan, 45, felt children could approach parents and “we can explain to them (right from wrong).”
A mother of two boys said it was “all natural”, while businessman Chung Toh Keong, 56, felt such issues should be taught, since we “don’t dare talk about such taboo topics”.
- TODAY/yb
Controversial content in AWARE's sex education programme sparks debate
By Alicia Wong, Lin Yanqin & Ester Ng, TODAY | Posted: 01 May 2009 0823 hrs
SINGAPORE: The debate over the sexuality education programme by the Association of Women for Action and Research boils down to a 15-minute segment of its three-hour workshop, TODAY has learnt after obtaining on Wednesday pages of the group’s Comprehensive Sexual Education: Basic Instructor Guide.
The section in question defines terms such as “anal sex”, “virginity”, “teenage pregnancy” and “homosexual”. As part of the workshop exercise, students are asked to associate these terms according to three categories: Positive, neutral and negative.
TODAY had approached AWARE’s old guard to verify the material, after receiving it from a source outside the group, and compared it with hard copies of the actual guide, which has separately been put on the Internet.
The rest of the guide deals with topics such as body image, HIV/Aids, contraception and relationships. But it is the description of terms such as homosexuality and anal sex that appears to be at the heart of the contention raised by self-declared “feminist mentor” and senior lawyer Thio Su Mien.
She took issue with homosexuality being seen as a neutral, not negative, word.
Founding AWARE member and its first president, Lena Cheng, met with TODAY and said that the group had consulted religious groups, academics, social workers and teachers when they adapted the guide from the 25-year-old International Women’s Health Coalition, which promotes and protects girls’ and women’s sexual and reproductive rights and health. “We’re not some feminists who just thought this up,” she said.
AWARE’s former programme manager Deeksha Vasundhra said the definitions are for instructors to facilitate discussions.
The “private and confidential” guide is never given to students, she said.
Students can also place the terms in question in more than one category and they are not pushed to accept certain views.
“I tell trainers, it’s not up to you to teach values. Decisions are made based on family, culture and religion,” she said, and added that children are always advised to speak to their parents or teachers.
Since the material caters to a wide age group, the onus remains on instructors to focus on the relevant topics, said Ms Vasundhra.
AWARE’s 10 trainers are selected for their maturity, open-mindedness and ability to manage young people. They go through a stringent selection process, training sessions and examinations.
One trainer told TODAY, discussions are “very student driven”.
“We basically ask students, ‘what’s your views?’ We don’t say anything, and let them hear all the different ideas... I only make sure everybody respects each other. We don’t believe in imposing any viewpoints,” she said.
During class, trainers use the word “partner” instead of “husband”, for instance, so that lesbian students do not “tune out,” said Ms Vasundhra. Ditto for homosexuality, which is not defined as abnormal so students do not feel excluded.
Ultimately, the aim, said Ms Vasundhra, is to “help kids see that everybody is different and help them to accept that”.
The workshops, conducted by AWARE at 11 secondary schools last year, were fully subsidised thanks to a donation from the Chen Su Lan Trust.
Each workshop cost between S$500 and S$600 but was free for the schools, which have not yet been named publicly.
Former AWARE president Constance Singam revealed to TODAY that S$35,000 out of the S$113,000 donated by the Chen Su Lan Trust last year was spent on the free Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) workshops at schools.
Asked if he was aware of the content of the CSE programme, Reverend Yap Kim Hao, the chairman of the Chen Su Lan Trust, said that he had been given a “rough outline” of the programme, but he had not seen the teaching materials.
When TODAY showed him two pages of the CSE trainers’ manual, which stated that “anal sex can be healthy” and that “homosexuality is perfectly normal”, Rev Yap said that he “had no problems” with the content.
“I recognise there are dissenting views, but these have to be presented and it’s up to the student to make a decision so (the trainer) is not promoting one particular view,” said Rev Yap.
The 80-year-old is a retired Bishop of the Methodist Church here and currently pastoral adviser to the Free Community Church.
TODAY contacted five schools about the programme. Four neither confirmed nor denied if they had the programme, and one said yes but did not reply to queries.
TODAY also showed 13 parents with teenage students the copy of the training material.
While the majority saw the importance of educating their children on sexuality and making the right choices, many also questioned the handling of controversial topics and the explicitness of the material.
“It’s okay to let them know (about sex) but not to this extent. I don’t want my son to learn such explicit things,” said Ms Nor, a mother of three.
Father of six, Rizan Jantan, 45, felt children could approach parents and “we can explain to them (right from wrong).”
A mother of two boys said it was “all natural”, while businessman Chung Toh Keong, 56, felt such issues should be taught, since we “don’t dare talk about such taboo topics”.
- TODAY/yb
Z
Zombie
Guest
If Rev Yap is right that the position taken in the materials is balanced, then Alan, son and company are the ones who took one side and blamed AWARE for their own decisions. What is more worrying is the herd mentality of those that join in later.
Of course, they can always say that they are more right than Rev Yap.
If Rev Yap is right that the position taken in the materials is balanced, then Alan, son and company are the ones who took one side and blamed AWARE for their own decisions. What is more worrying is the herd mentality of those that join in later.
Of course, they can always say that they are more right than Rev Yap.
Not sure if they are more right but I can safely say that they take the holy book very literally...
Taking the good book (actually books - there's at least the OT & the NT) very literally poses a number of problems and almost immediately demands selection, e.g.
So while these good Thiolibans would merrily choose not to observe these other 'instructions' they would rail against something which really personally offend them.
- Noah's curse on Ham can and has been used as an excuse to subjugate dark-skinned people;
- Elswhere it is suggested that it is wrong to wear cloths of different weaves - which btw many Muslims observe.
So while these good Thiolibans would merrily choose not to observe these other 'instructions' they would rail against something which really personally offend them.
they will take it literally or figuratively according to their fancies, taking it in parts or whole as their whims, when necessary take it out of context. when cannot defend, says it is faith, when it is inconvenient, say it was the old promise, when required, it is a prophesy,,,,,
By the way, Ex-bishop Yap is involved with Free Community Church believing God loves the sinners, that is inclusive of GLBT.
By the way, Ex-bishop Yap is involved with Free Community Church believing God loves the sinners, that is inclusive of GLBT.
Similar threads
