• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Lawyer struck off the rolls for forging documents

XingCai

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 18, 2013
Messages
68
Points
0

Lawyer struck off the rolls for forging documents


Published on May 5, 2015 8:29 AM

jyaid0545e.jpg


Lawyer Gopinath Pillai, 44, the former chairman of the Law Society's Criminal Aid Legal Scheme who is known for his volunteer work, was struck off the rolls for forging court documents and lying about the status of a lawsuit to fob off a client who was chasing him for updates. -- PHOTO: ST FILE

By Selina Lum

A 44-YEAR-OLD lawyer known for his volunteer work was yesterday struck off the rolls for forging court documents and lying about the status of a lawsuit to fob off a client who was chasing him for updates.

For that, Mr Gopinath Pillai, the former chairman of the Law Society's Criminal Aid Legal Scheme, had to face the Court of Three Judges, which has the power to suspend or strike lawyers off the rolls for professional misconduct.

His counsel, Mr Suresh Damodara, urged the court not to disbar him, arguing that Mr Pillai had been under severe stress at the time from a combination of unfortunate circumstances in both his professional and personal lives.

Mr Damodara also noted that though Mr Pillai had been charged in January last year with six counts of forgery, he was eventually given a stern warning.

The criminal charges were withdrawn in August on condition he accepted the warning and did not commit any offence within two years, did not practise as a lawyer for three years, and continued with psychiatric treatment and counselling.

But Mr Chandra Mohan, acting for the Law Society, noted that cases in which lawyers acted dishonestly have invariably led to them being struck off.

The judges said that despite strong mitigating circumstances, they saw no basis for taking a different approach.

However, they added that he "may find a favourable response" if he were to seek reinstatement earlier than what would usually be the case.


 
Back
Top