-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Lawless Society gatecrashes M Ravi's party, gets buttkicked by Judge
- Thread starter Confuseous
- Start date
all part of the show...
Ravi bi-polar, LSS ta-ada bola, Kita ketawa!
After being buttkicked by the Judge and bitch slapped by the public, the Lawless Society hides its tail between its legs and left its rep, Mr Wong Siew Hong, high and dry by implicating that he acted on his own accord. What a b*lless creep of an organisation, not wishing to take responsibility.
But in doing so, it would also mean that the Lawless Society's original intention, ie to stop M Ravi from proceeding to argue his cases, would not be effective. So the Lawless Society says that although Mr Wong SH acted on his own accord, he was doing it in the best interest of the public.
Haha. So there you have it. The B*lless Lawless Society wants to effectively tell the world the M Ravi is not a fit guy to be representing cases, but doesn't want to take the flak for the fiasco and had poor silly crappy lapdog Mr Wong SH to take the rap.
- http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.sg/2012/07/m-ravi-bipolar-lawless-society-ta-ada.html
After being buttkicked by the Judge and bitch slapped by the public, the Lawless Society hides its tail between its legs and left its rep, Mr Wong Siew Hong, high and dry by implicating that he acted on his own accord. What a b*lless creep of an organisation, not wishing to take responsibility.
But in doing so, it would also mean that the Lawless Society's original intention, ie to stop M Ravi from proceeding to argue his cases, would not be effective. So the Lawless Society says that although Mr Wong SH acted on his own accord, he was doing it in the best interest of the public.
Haha. So there you have it. The B*lless Lawless Society wants to effectively tell the world the M Ravi is not a fit guy to be representing cases, but doesn't want to take the flak for the fiasco and had poor silly crappy lapdog Mr Wong SH to take the rap.
- http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.sg/2012/07/m-ravi-bipolar-lawless-society-ta-ada.html
Re: Law Society - We did not try to prevent Mr Ravi from appearing in court
People have forgotten 2 events that happened in the past.
1) When Old Goat was in the process of getting rid of Devan Nair and smearing his name, he appeared in Parliament waving around Nair's medical file as proof that he was an alcoholic and wife beater. How did he get these confidential medical records of the President of Singapore? Why did Nair's doctor give those files?
Answer: when its a political case, there is no limit to what the govt. can get and will do, including forcing otherwise upright doctors to violate their confidence, trust and integrity with their patients.
2) AT a Law SOciety annual gala years ago, Wooden fired a warning shot to the gathered legal eagles. He said there were "too many lawyers" in singapore, implying that he can curb the number of law practitioners if he wanted to. The real message was toe the line and do what I want or I will fix u.
Combine these 2 episodes with today's Ravi situation. Obviously, this is a political case. The PAP cannot be seen to discredit Ravi directly themselves, and most certainly not reveal that they can get a hold of anyone's medical file if they choose. They Instructed the law society to control their lawyer.........or else. PAP pressures Dr. calvin Phoney (or maybe Phoney was already a PAP lackey) to write the letter to the Law Society. The Law Society sends in their dog to present this letter. Frankly, I am surprised Pillai kicked them out of court. I expected him to disqualify Ravi and dismiss the case. So really, this episode still shows the PAP are the far reaching bastards that they were. People who have half a brain will realise that your medical file and medical information can be any time divulge to anyone if the PAP wants to. Also, people should realise, if they had doubts before, that the LAw society and the whole legal/judicial process is controlled by the PAP.
It would seem to me that the law society does not know anything about court procedure, patient doctor confidentiality (they should have told Phoney that they cannot accpet a letter from him, if he has a problem he should file a complaint), nor how to disbar a lawyer from practice.
People have forgotten 2 events that happened in the past.
1) When Old Goat was in the process of getting rid of Devan Nair and smearing his name, he appeared in Parliament waving around Nair's medical file as proof that he was an alcoholic and wife beater. How did he get these confidential medical records of the President of Singapore? Why did Nair's doctor give those files?
Answer: when its a political case, there is no limit to what the govt. can get and will do, including forcing otherwise upright doctors to violate their confidence, trust and integrity with their patients.
2) AT a Law SOciety annual gala years ago, Wooden fired a warning shot to the gathered legal eagles. He said there were "too many lawyers" in singapore, implying that he can curb the number of law practitioners if he wanted to. The real message was toe the line and do what I want or I will fix u.
Combine these 2 episodes with today's Ravi situation. Obviously, this is a political case. The PAP cannot be seen to discredit Ravi directly themselves, and most certainly not reveal that they can get a hold of anyone's medical file if they choose. They Instructed the law society to control their lawyer.........or else. PAP pressures Dr. calvin Phoney (or maybe Phoney was already a PAP lackey) to write the letter to the Law Society. The Law Society sends in their dog to present this letter. Frankly, I am surprised Pillai kicked them out of court. I expected him to disqualify Ravi and dismiss the case. So really, this episode still shows the PAP are the far reaching bastards that they were. People who have half a brain will realise that your medical file and medical information can be any time divulge to anyone if the PAP wants to. Also, people should realise, if they had doubts before, that the LAw society and the whole legal/judicial process is controlled by the PAP.
It would seem to me that the law society does not know anything about court procedure, patient doctor confidentiality (they should have told Phoney that they cannot accpet a letter from him, if he has a problem he should file a complaint), nor how to disbar a lawyer from practice.
Last edited:
Is Dr Calvin Fones an angmoh doctor ?
I am not a Name Expert but probably his name was Calvin Fong Soon Leng and wrongly written as FONES.
He also reminds me of a new Chinese migrant from China to America who attempted to win the American Idol show. Very close look-a-like.
Wah, you mean SPH and all the media also kar-lang kar- boh and could get something as simple as a name to the printing press WRONG, after a few of their moles kanna exposed?
Wow, this fear of the Lee dynasty is more wide spread and deep than perceived! LOL
Last edited:
Is Dr Calvin Fones an angmoh doctor ?
Family name Fong. Registration clerk misspelt it as "Fones". St Andrew's boy.
Re: Law Society - We did not try to prevent Mr Ravi from appearing in court
Let me put it this way, simpler.
If Ravi was just another well known lawyer and does not touch political issues. especially one that takes on the gov and this lawyer has the same problems and same trouble caused, would law society send a dummy ( now they claimed the dummy acted on his own as though dummies could think on their own) to do all these things?
No, they will do it on the quiet and even hushed up many issues. LOL
Let me put it this way, simpler.
If Ravi was just another well known lawyer and does not touch political issues. especially one that takes on the gov and this lawyer has the same problems and same trouble caused, would law society send a dummy ( now they claimed the dummy acted on his own as though dummies could think on their own) to do all these things?
No, they will do it on the quiet and even hushed up many issues. LOL
Last edited:
Re: Ravi in Wonderland
Despite his "Sieow" conditions, Lawyer Ravi can fight the case all the way to the top! Attorney-General's Chambers legal advisers really look bad, Malu.
Despite his "Sieow" conditions, Lawyer Ravi can fight the case all the way to the top! Attorney-General's Chambers legal advisers really look bad, Malu.
Re: Law Society - We did not try to prevent Mr Ravi from appearing in court
LSS or Mr Wong trying to sabo him by passing the ball to him. So being smart and don't want to become public enemy, he's basically saying (in our context), "You guys gave him the practicing cert, you want to fix him, go fix yourself. Don't sabo me."
LSS or Mr Wong trying to sabo him by passing the ball to him. So being smart and don't want to become public enemy, he's basically saying (in our context), "You guys gave him the practicing cert, you want to fix him, go fix yourself. Don't sabo me."
Re: Ravi in Wonderland
Is Wong Siew Hong a staff of the Law Society ? I checked the Law Society's website but couldn't find his name. Is he a staff of the Secretariat ?
OR is he a member of some committee of the Law Society ?
The fact that the Law Society has distanced itself from the action of WSH suggests that the matter had not been brought to the notice of the Council or Secretariat of the Law Society before WSH gatecrashed Justice Pillai's party.
Is Wong Siew Hong a staff of the Law Society ? I checked the Law Society's website but couldn't find his name. Is he a staff of the Secretariat ?
OR is he a member of some committee of the Law Society ?
The fact that the Law Society has distanced itself from the action of WSH suggests that the matter had not been brought to the notice of the Council or Secretariat of the Law Society before WSH gatecrashed Justice Pillai's party.
Last edited:
Re: Ravi in Wonderland
http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/07/1...-statement-to-the-media-dated-16th-july-2012/
Mr Wong Siew Hong is the chairman of the sub-committee on member care of LAWSOC. However, he is not a council member of LAWSOC.
http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/07/1...-statement-to-the-media-dated-16th-july-2012/
Mr Wong Siew Hong is the chairman of the sub-committee on member care of LAWSOC. However, he is not a council member of LAWSOC.
Re: Ravi in Wonderland
The link you posted is not updated. It's the cache. The current President is Wong Meng Meng, not Michael Huang.
The link you posted is not updated. It's the cache. The current President is Wong Meng Meng, not Michael Huang.
Similar threads
