- Joined
- Aug 6, 2008
- Messages
- 1,975
- Points
- 0
Attacking one MP with shoes is one thing, an acid attack is another*.
I'm not sure if acid attacks are the best way to express one's unhappiness though. So while I express deep understanding on the reasons why people have felt so unhappy, I also do believe that there should be a time for us to ponder on how to express one's displeasure without actually doing action that gives some ordinary Singaporeans thoughts on whether did the opposition had planned this or not.
I mean, I'm certainly not saying nor implying people within the main parties have played a role in it...what I am referring to is that the PAP may use this incident as a way to spin the story in their direction, portraying them as victims and then implying that the attack came from individual members whom may be part of the opposition.
In any case, I don't believe that acid attacks on politicians is the best way, nor a way which I would endorse in any way. I would rather spar with him or her verbally and let the votes do the talking. I don't believe democracy means we have to fight like the Taiwanese do over there, or we have to throw acid the way some men do to their women in areas in South Asia.
*what I had made as an erroneous mistake is to say that it was an acid attack. It isn't true. Instead it was someone splashing oil on him and then the assailant lighting up after that. I apologise for my error.
I'm not sure if acid attacks are the best way to express one's unhappiness though. So while I express deep understanding on the reasons why people have felt so unhappy, I also do believe that there should be a time for us to ponder on how to express one's displeasure without actually doing action that gives some ordinary Singaporeans thoughts on whether did the opposition had planned this or not.
I mean, I'm certainly not saying nor implying people within the main parties have played a role in it...what I am referring to is that the PAP may use this incident as a way to spin the story in their direction, portraying them as victims and then implying that the attack came from individual members whom may be part of the opposition.
In any case, I don't believe that acid attacks on politicians is the best way, nor a way which I would endorse in any way. I would rather spar with him or her verbally and let the votes do the talking. I don't believe democracy means we have to fight like the Taiwanese do over there, or we have to throw acid the way some men do to their women in areas in South Asia.
*what I had made as an erroneous mistake is to say that it was an acid attack. It isn't true. Instead it was someone splashing oil on him and then the assailant lighting up after that. I apologise for my error.