• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Karen's brother died after getting jab; MOH expert panel says it was not vaccine related.

If the deaths come months or years after vaccination, they will insist the victims died of some other cause.

Sometimes, blaming old age helps. :sneaky:


That's why vaccination started with the old here. They're generally more obedient to the piss and poop and their deaths can be easily disclaimed with pre-existing medical conditions.
As long as there are willing and dumb guinea pigs here, all will be well with the pappy fuckers.
 
Last edited:
One died in many millions who have taken the vaccine. Move on.
 
Many viruses kill. However for the young flu is far more serious. The fatality rate for Covid is a lot lower.
8koha4wdhnv41.jpg
 
Here's how it plays out..... the initial headlines will take whatever data the media finds that suits their purpose :


Editors' Pick|Mar 15, 2021,10:13am EDT|90,342 views
U.K. Coronavirus Variant Is Significantly More Deadly, Says New Study
Victoria Forster
Victoria Forster

Contributor

Health
Cancer research scientist and childhood cancer survivor.

Coronavirus, Covid-19, UK, variant, VOC, transmissible, vaccine, vaccines


The B.1.1.7 coronavirus variant "UK variant" is more deadly as well as more transmissible, according ... [+]

getty
The U.K. coronavirus variant known as B.1.1.7 is not only more transmissible, but also more deadly than other coronavirus variants, according to a new study published today.


B.1.1.7 was first identified in the U.K. last fall and by December it was detected in several other countries including the U.S. The variant is known to be substantially more transmissible than other SARS-CoV2 coronavirus lineages and quickly took over as the dominant variant in the U.K., late last year, sparking off a damaging and deadly second wave which leaves the U.K. currently second in the world for the most Covid-19 deaths per 100,000 people.


However when the dust settles this is the result....


Australian Associated PressAustralian Associated Press
UK virus variant no more severe: study
13 April 2021·2-min read


9fcbb6320acb99bd4982ee5af2ae5471

The British coronavirus variant first detected in Kent and now dominant in the UK and a number of other countries is more transmissible but does not increase disease severity, research suggests.
Two studies have found no evidence people with the B117 variant have worse symptoms or a heightened risk of developing long COVID than those with a different strain.
However viral load and the reproduction (R) number were higher for B117, adding to growing evidence it is more transmissible than the first strain detected in Wuhan, China, in December 2019.
One observational study of patients in London hospitals suggests the variant is not associated with more severe illness and death but appears to lead to higher viral load.
A separate study using data logged by 37,000 UK users of a self-reporting coronavirus symptom app found no evidence the variant altered symptoms or likelihood of experiencing long COVID.
Authors of both studies acknowledge their findings differ from some other studies exploring the severity of the variant and have called for more research.
The emergence of variants has raised concerns about whether they could spread easily and be more deadly, and that vaccines might be less effective against them.
Findings from the new studies, conducted between September and December when B117 emerged and started spreading across parts of England, provide insights into its characteristics that will help inform public health, clinical and research responses.
A paper in The Lancet Infectious Diseases journal is a whole-genome sequencing and cohort study involving coronavirus patients admitted to University College London Hospital and North Middlesex University Hospital between November 9 and December 20.
The authors compared illness severity in people with and without B117 and calculated viral load.
Among 341 patients who had test swabs sequenced, 58 per cent had B117 and 42 per cent had a non-B117 infection.
Researchers found no evidence of an association between the variant and increased severity, with 36 per cent of B117 patients becoming severely ill or dying, compared with 38 per cent of those with a different strain.
Those with the variant were no more likely to die than patients with a different strain, with 16 per cent dying within 28 days compared with 17 per cent for those with a non-B117 infection.
A second study, published in The Lancet Public Health, analysed self-reported data from 36,920 UK users of the COVID Symptom Study app who tested positive for the disease between September 28 and December 27.
The analysis covered 13 full weeks over the period when the proportion of B117 grew most notably in London, the South East and East of England.
For each week in every region in the analysis (Scotland, Wales and the seven England regions), authors calculated the proportion of users reporting any of 14 COVID-19 symptoms.
This revealed no significant associations between the proportion of B117 within regions and the type of symptoms experienced.







Scientists had suspected that B.1.1.7 might be more deadly, as well as more transmissible following spectacularly high numbers of Covid-19 deaths in the U.K. during the second wave this winter, which saw the U.K’s worst daily death total in January claim over 1,800 lives. But, the new study published in the journal Nature, led by researchers at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine all but confirms that this correlation is genuine.


The study looked at viral genetics data from almost 5,000 people in the U.K. who died from Covid-19, with two-thirds of those being confirmed to have the B.1.1.7 variant. It found that people who were infected with B.1.1.7 had a 55% higher risk of dying within 28 days of being tested positive for Covid-19.


“England has suffered an enormous toll from B.1.1.7 in the last few months, with 42,000 COVID-19 deaths in January and February 2021 alone,” said Nick Davies, PhD, lead author from LSHTM’s Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases. “In spite of substantial advances in COVID-19 treatment, we have already seen more deaths in 2021 than we did over the first eight months of the pandemic in 2020. Our work helps to explain why,” Davies added.


The new work follows another study from the U.K. published last week, which showed that people who tested positive for B.1.1.7 in a community setting were also more likely to die within 28 days of a positive test than those with other variants.
EztXke1WYAIacIx.jpg
 
I'm always correct. Sometimes it just takes a bit longer for people to realise how insightful I am in matters that pique my interest.

In 2 year's time we'll revisit Covid and it will be blatantly clear that everything I said about corona was spot on.

EztYaRRXoAUuqQo.jpg
 
It's a global thing. Drug companies are exempt from any liability relating to vaccine-related injuries. Nobody gives a shit. Not the companies developing it and not the countries requiring you to get it.
No thats misleading. Its only this vaccine. Every other kind for other diseases no such thing
 
I'm always correct. Sometimes it just takes a bit longer for people to realise how insightful I am in matters that pique my interest.

In 2 year's time we'll revisit Covid and it will be blatantly clear that everything I said about corona was spot on.

You are actually 0 for 119 tries.

So you are a dumpster fire.

And lacking in any intelligence whatsoever.
 
No thats misleading. Its only this vaccine. Every other kind for other diseases no such thing
ever read this? : https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2030600

some excerpts :
As early as 2006, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations, the global pharmaceutical-industry lobbying group, publicly demanded that manufacturers be granted protection from lawsuits associated with vaccine-related adverse events if they were going to participate in pandemic responses. In the United States, the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act provides manufacturers immunity from lawsuits related to injuries caused by vaccines, with narrow exceptions. People injured by Covid-19 vaccines must file claims with a fund administered by the Department of Health and Human Services.

First, 24 countries and the Canadian province of Quebec have no-fault vaccine-injury compensation systems for routine immunizations.2 Although these systems generally aren’t designed to cover injuries related to vaccine administration during public health emergencies, they could quickly be adapted to do so. Changes could be made to policies related to funding, proving injury, and distributing compensation. These systems tend to exist in wealthier countries, but Nepal and Vietnam also have such systems. Countries with existing no-fault vaccine-injury compensation systems could incorporate Covid-19 vaccines into these programs.

You must be in the medical profession. :roflmao:
 
The big question is....if the condition is not caused by the vaccine...than wat is the cause of his condition? Ppl don't get reactions just like tat
 
The big question is....if the condition is not caused by the vaccine...than wat is the cause of his condition? Ppl don't get reactions just like tat
That's why we need an Independent Panel of Medical Experts.
 
That's why we need an Independent Panel of Medical Experts.
With pap dominance... there is nothing tat can b independent. N for the hospital to inform the family why the patient is ill is part n parcel of medicine. So wat is the cause of his illness
 
Prepare for more side effects

BioNTech eyes COVID vaccine for 12-15 year olds from June in EU - The Online Citizen Asia
BioNTech said Thursday that it expected its COVID-19 vaccine, jointly developed with Pfizer, to be available to 12 to 15-year-olds in Europe from June.

The German firm’s CEO Ugur Sahin told Der Spiegel weekly that it was “in the final stretches” of preparing its submission for European regulatory approval.

The evaluation of the trial data “takes four to six weeks on average”, he added.

Vaccinating children is seen as a crucial next step toward herd immunity and ending the pandemic.

The prospect of getting older children inoculated before the next school year starts would also relieve the strain on parents who are juggling the demands of homeschooling while keeping up with jobs.

“It’s very important to enable children a return to their normal school lives and allow them to meet with family and friends,” Sahin told Spiegel.

BioNTech/Pfizer already applied for emergency US authorisation of their jab for 12 to 15-year-olds earlier this month.

Sahin expects to submit a similar request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) next Wednesday, he told Spiegel.

The move comes after BioNTech and Pfizer in late March announced that phase 3 clinical trials of their vaccine for children aged 12-15 showed it was 100 percent effective in warding off the disease.

Both companies are also racing to get the jab approved for younger children, from six months upwards.

“In July, the first results for five to 12-year-olds could be available, and those for younger children in September,” he said.

Ongoing trials so far are “very encouraging”, Sahin said, suggesting that “children are very well protected by the vaccine”.

The BioNTech/Pfizer shot is based on novel mRNA technology and was the first Covid-19 jab to be approved in the West late last year.

— AFP
 
Back
Top