Source: The Online Citizen Facebook
Just In - Roy Ngerng has paid $29,000 in costs to Drew & Napier LLC.
Just In - Roy Ngerng has paid $29,000 in costs to Drew & Napier LLC.
End Of Article
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Just In - Roy Ngerng has paid $29,000 in costs to Drew & Napier LLC.
- Thread starter xingguy
- Start date
Source: The Heart Truths
FEBRUARY 6, 2015
The $29,000 has been Paid to Lee Hsien Loong’s Lawyers from Drew & Napier
Hello everyone,
I just left Drew & Napier’s office a while ago.
I got to their office at 5pm today and sat there for nearly 3 hours.
The court had asked me to pay $29,000 to the lawyers of the Singapore prime minister Lee Hsien Loong, from Drew & Napier, for the summary judgment last year, for his lawyers’ costs.
However, no one from Drew & Napier wanted to see me just now for nearly 3 hours. I sat at their waiting area for 3 hours while Drew & Napier would only speak to me via their receptionist. I even had to write down my queries on a piece of paper so that the receptionist could convey the message.
When I made a call to an Angela Cheng from Drew & Napier, she hanged up my call halfway and did not want to speak to me.
Later, I found out that the prime minister’s press secretary, Ms Chang Li Lin, once again issued a statement for him.
She said that, “under the lawyers’ professional rules, a lawyer cannot, without the consent of the opposite party’s lawyer, deal directly with the opposite party”.
So, Drew & Napier refused to accept my payment and Ms Chang went ahead to say that Drew & Napier can file an application in court “to compel payment and for costs”.
“If that order is granted and payment is still not made, Mr Lee will avail himself of his legal remedies,” she also said.
The prime minister wants to apply to the court to make me pay for most costs, if I don’t make the payment. But I was actually sitting in Drew & Napier’s office for 3 hours, waiting to make payment.
I was initially unable to contact my lawyer earlier as he had a court case to attend to. Eventually, I managed to contact him and he was able to inform Drew & Napier to collect the payment of $29,000 from me.
You can see the receipt below.
Please note that this $29,000 is not what I have to pay to the prime minister in damages. This is only for his lawyers’ costs for the summary judgment.
There will still be another hearing in June to determine how much I would have to pay the prime minister in damages. The prime minister has filed for the defamation suit in the high court, which oversees cases of more than $250,000, so this is the least that the prime minister wants me to pay to him.
I am appalled that the prime minister’s press secretary has once again issued a statement on his behalf. The prime minister is not allowed to sue me in his position as a prime minister. As such, he is not allowed to use state resources, such as his press secretary, to release statements or act on his behalf.
The payment to the prime minister’s lawyers has now been made. I will have to pay even more when the hearing on the damages is heard in June.
On Wednesday, the CPF Advisory Panel released their recommendations. But I have explained yesterday that nothing has changed about the CPF. Singaporeans’ CPF will still be trapped inside and Singaporeans will still not be able to earn more in our CPF. The PAP businessmen will not help Singaporeans. The PAP businessmen will not protect Singaporeans.
What happened today has caused much distress. But it’s settled. If you want your CPF to be returned to you, the only way you will get it back if you stand up and fight for it.
FEBRUARY 6, 2015
The $29,000 has been Paid to Lee Hsien Loong’s Lawyers from Drew & Napier
Hello everyone,
I just left Drew & Napier’s office a while ago.
I got to their office at 5pm today and sat there for nearly 3 hours.
The court had asked me to pay $29,000 to the lawyers of the Singapore prime minister Lee Hsien Loong, from Drew & Napier, for the summary judgment last year, for his lawyers’ costs.
However, no one from Drew & Napier wanted to see me just now for nearly 3 hours. I sat at their waiting area for 3 hours while Drew & Napier would only speak to me via their receptionist. I even had to write down my queries on a piece of paper so that the receptionist could convey the message.
When I made a call to an Angela Cheng from Drew & Napier, she hanged up my call halfway and did not want to speak to me.
Later, I found out that the prime minister’s press secretary, Ms Chang Li Lin, once again issued a statement for him.
She said that, “under the lawyers’ professional rules, a lawyer cannot, without the consent of the opposite party’s lawyer, deal directly with the opposite party”.
So, Drew & Napier refused to accept my payment and Ms Chang went ahead to say that Drew & Napier can file an application in court “to compel payment and for costs”.
“If that order is granted and payment is still not made, Mr Lee will avail himself of his legal remedies,” she also said.
The prime minister wants to apply to the court to make me pay for most costs, if I don’t make the payment. But I was actually sitting in Drew & Napier’s office for 3 hours, waiting to make payment.
I was initially unable to contact my lawyer earlier as he had a court case to attend to. Eventually, I managed to contact him and he was able to inform Drew & Napier to collect the payment of $29,000 from me.
You can see the receipt below.
Please note that this $29,000 is not what I have to pay to the prime minister in damages. This is only for his lawyers’ costs for the summary judgment.
There will still be another hearing in June to determine how much I would have to pay the prime minister in damages. The prime minister has filed for the defamation suit in the high court, which oversees cases of more than $250,000, so this is the least that the prime minister wants me to pay to him.
I am appalled that the prime minister’s press secretary has once again issued a statement on his behalf. The prime minister is not allowed to sue me in his position as a prime minister. As such, he is not allowed to use state resources, such as his press secretary, to release statements or act on his behalf.
The payment to the prime minister’s lawyers has now been made. I will have to pay even more when the hearing on the damages is heard in June.
On Wednesday, the CPF Advisory Panel released their recommendations. But I have explained yesterday that nothing has changed about the CPF. Singaporeans’ CPF will still be trapped inside and Singaporeans will still not be able to earn more in our CPF. The PAP businessmen will not help Singaporeans. The PAP businessmen will not protect Singaporeans.
What happened today has caused much distress. But it’s settled. If you want your CPF to be returned to you, the only way you will get it back if you stand up and fight for it.
End Of Article
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Messages
- 27,890
- Points
- 113
Lai Ah Lai ah.... Please donate more money to Roy so that some sucker can get more commission!!!
The sucker is Drew and Napier lah!
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2014
- Messages
- 36,768
- Points
- 113
Roy would soon be hawking books by the street corner like Chee and JBJ. Looking foward to the day when PAP totally demolishes idiots like Roy and HHH the same way they did to JBJ and Chee. All M Ravi can do is collect his legal fees while putting up a show of providing legal defence. He can't do a damn thing to make a difference.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Messages
- 27,890
- Points
- 113
Get rid of the peaceful critics will only lead to the rise of others who are willing to take up unconventional actions.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 13,736
- Points
- 113
i believe many upright sinkies sympathise with roy but they know if they support him openly, they will get into trouble. 人在做，天真的在看。if karma dun hit lhl, it will befall on his children. he is a joke to take up a case against roy who is half his age. pap is really bullying peasants!
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Messages
- 27,890
- Points
- 113
LHL, in his capacity as PM, sues Ordinary Roy, uses private law firm. MINDEF wants to sue patent owners, use AG office. Why the difference? LHL doesn't trust the lawyers in the public service? These lawyers eventually climb to become our judges. So, LHL doesn't think highly of our judges too?
Dun joke lar. I am a nobody, what can they do to me?
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 13,736
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Messages
- 27,890
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2013
- Messages
- 26,183
- Points
- 113
You must bring him out for your makan sessions lah.
But imdun like his spectacles leh...
...u ask him change specs first suing in the first tool of defence. Hurts more than a Leopard II Tank blowing you into pieces.
Last edited:
I don't work in public sector nor GLC. I work for a foreign mnc.
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2012
- Messages
- 104
- Points
- 0
PAP = Sue Party
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2010
- Messages
- 80,748
- Points
- 113
Yes very no justice, everything take from the poor and give to the rich. Why people in AMK still want to vote for such a person? That day I tried to talk to my friend in AMK about voting opposition but she doesn't want to talk. She said voting is secret. Is it still secret?
Similar threads
