Quite a fair reasonable objective take on this issue...I am also curious to hear from Dr Kanwaljit Soin and Claire Chiang on this matter as both are former AWARE presidents
THE BUZZ
Aware: Too much shrieking, too little explaining
By Tan Mae Lynn
April 20, 2009
I AM woman, hear my sisters shriek. Apologies to Helen Reddy, who in the '70s, sang the inspirational and empowering line: 'I am woman, hear me roar.'
TNP FILE PICTURE
Sadly, what has been happening at the Association of Women for Action and Research (Aware) has been neither inspirational nor empowering.
It has been loud, yes, and shrill rather than resounding - with all the dignity and decorum of a cat fight.
Ladies, I am embarrassed.
And I say this of the actions of both the incoming team as well as the old guard.
It is doubtful if the events of the past couple of weeks, following the association's elections, reflect its founding goals of achieving social equality.
Both the power-grabbers and the old guard are to blame for how ugly things have become, and the less than glowing coverage Aware has attracted in the media.
First, how could the old guard not have suspected anything when their membership numbers spiked over the last few months?
Indeed, it appeared that they had not found anything amiss until one of their own was badly defeated in the election for vice-president.
It was only then that they checked and realised that an overwhelming majority of those who had turned up to vote were new members.
The old guard should reflect on whether they have been receptive to fresh ideas and open to thoughts of rejuvenating the organisation - and whether they were even (pardon the pun) aware of what was going on around them.
One cannot help but suspect they may have operated like an elitist 'old girls' club.
On the other side is a group that appears like a bunch of bullies in its bid for power.
Did they think they could grab power without having to deal with public scrutiny?
They certainly have some explaining to do, after having made such a move at a well-known, well-established organisation.
But they have said little. They haven't really opened up to queries and their two statements have not exactly cleared the air.
What they stand for
Surely, if they choose to take over such a high-profile organisation in such a dramatic fashion, they must be prepared to talk about who they are, what they stand for and how they plan to implement change.
As educated women, they should know that in any election regardless of scale, the candidates should make their views and commitment known.
In Aware's latest statement, its new president, Ms Josie Lau, asked: 'Why have some people cast aspersions on our good intentions?... Does the old guard harbour an alternative agenda? If so, they should disclose their motives and objectives fully and honestly.'
How ironic.
She and her team have not answered those questions themselves. The public have been kept in the dark about these 'good intentions'.
It would be naive to expect people to grant them full confidence without being fully informed.
I'm not a member of Aware and after this, I doubt I'll ever be one.