Paki is very moslem. The fair skinned pakis executed over 1 million bengalis in 1971, for the terrible crime of being dark skin moslems or worse, hindus. Jews face less cruel fates at the Nazis than Hindus would face against pakis. Pakistan today is in poor shape, after losing Bangladesh (East Paki) in 1971 because the dark skin moslems dare to demand for independence.
Paki military was setup by the Brits and is still loyal to the Anglo yankee kuffar.
I'm not saying Pakis were necessarily wrong in trying to permanently uproot Hindutva terrorist agents from Bangla soil, maybe the intent was good but the execution was ill advised. Nonetheless they should not have carried out wholesale ethnic cleansing against the majority of their population even if it remains true that the Banglas were ignorant in those days and influenced by Hindutva terrorists' propaganda.
Just like in Jiuhu with too many kafir chinks (mostly) dan lain-lain in their midst, Bangla had too many kuffar in their midst. At least, for all the ills of the paki military, we might give them credit where credit is due. They nipped the threat of Hindutva radicalism in Bangla in the bud.
Today, if you say Pakis are in economic dire straits without assistance of Bangla, it means you admit that Bangla has outperformed Pakis without those treacherous venomous snakes called Hindutva radicals in their midst. It's also to be noted that Bangla, by the same measure, has outperformed its nearest neighbour to the West in what is informally called Waste Bengal.
Ergo, there is ample evidence that nipping Hindutva radicalism in the bud was not a bad decision by the Pakis even if there were loads and loads of errors in execution.
I'm just waiting for Sabah and Sarawak to do the same, and the muud moslem soldiers from peninsular malaysia will come over to kill in great numbers..
No need. Import 50 million Bangla, 30 million Indon, 20 million Paki. That's 100 million Muslims, not from any single country so not going to be held hostage by any one country. Problem solved. Democracy can take care of the rest. Oh yeah don't forget to hand out MyKAD.
Stinkypura does that anyway, been doing that for decades, first to jiuhu chinks, then tiongs, then ceca virus, pinoy, viets, even burmese but not Muslims from anywhere whatsoever. It's stated policy, publicly stated policy of racist & zionist terrorist abetting regime of lee dynasty in stinkypura to "maintain the racial balance".
Jiuhu can certainly take a leaf out of that book to solve any potential issue in Borneo.
The rise of islamic religiosity is thanks to Saud family and their oil wealth. If not for them, you wouldn't have so many halal food choices today when you dine out.
There has been no Islamic Caliphate/Khilafah since 1923 anywhere in the world.
Your BS about Al Saud family does not pass muster.
When did Al Saud family proclaim themselves the Khalifah of all Muslims?
Never.
They are content with serving their anglo yankee masters.
No one really care what that racist Butt says but you. The jiuhu and indons think they are islamic or arabic enough.
Ibn Battuta was the greatest traveller in recorded history prior to steam engines.
you are a nobody in a snot sized peesai of a country in a one party banana republic and a fake statelet. Nobody cares about a kafir chink like you, more so on any topic related to Islam.
Nobody cares about an insignificant oaf like you, not today, not 200, 300 or 500 or 1500 years later would anybody care about you. Like many of the other billions of insignificant heathen peasant chinks or ceca virus or gayropeans or naggers that perished and nobody bats an eyelid today. And nobody alive today even knows they ever existed or what they did while they were well and alive.
Nope. moslems were successful in warfare for a long time, and acquired new technology from places they conquered. It helped moslems to be advanced for a time. But other than firearms and artillery, moslem rulers and imams generally don't like innovation. Most of their national income is also based on slave trading and war booty, instead of encouraging honest peaceful commerce.
Muslims, not Moslems.
Muslims were successful in warfare because they were largely composed of warrior races (such as Arabs from the peninsula riding horses or camels and having to survive in treacherous and unforgiving desert terrain, or turkic donkeys from stepps of central asia or siberia well versed in the art of archery and horse riding).
Islamic Golden Age had nothing to do with acquiring technology from conquering new places since naggers or ASEAN had no technology, and CECA virus only believed in cow dung and cow urine can be used for therapeutical purposes.
There was no technology to borrow from the Russkies back then either, the Yanks were not even a country, Japs or Gooks were backwater and unheard of in most of the world, Poms, Germans, French, Austrians or Swedes had no technology to offer. How could anybody have conquered those backward regions to borrow technology? If a country is generally technologically advanced across a broad range of sectors, it is the advanced country which should do the conquering instead. Noway should an advanced country get conquered even if it were peaceful in intent all along.
Golden Age of Islam permitted Muslims to advanced human frontier of knowledge across a broad range of areas and in too many fields of knowledge too numerous to mention. A quick search or reading a few books by honoured, non biased researchers in this discipline can expand the knowledge of any ignoramus, no matter how low IQ he may be. Yes, even a nitwit like you, too, can benefit.
There's also no "true teachings" even within islam because islam doctrines change with time. Moslems in the past were okay with mahomet being the founder of islam or that he fucked a kid. Today, moslems get upset at these facts and want to backdate their islam to Adam to make islam older, or modify aiesha's age to 19 to make him look less like a pedo.
The Quran remains as it was more than 1400 years ago.
No changes whatsoever.
What has changed or can change is Hadith.
Those who fanatically insist on the authenticity of Hadiths above Quran and refuse to believe anything else except Hadiths have a hard time proving their adherence to traditions described in Hadiths.
One such Hadith talks about the benefits of camel milk and urine. CECA virus like Zakir Naik is also a strong propoent of the authenticity of all Hadiths above anything else including the benefits of camel milk and urine.
I strongly urge all the proponents of Hadiths above anything else to publicly extract camel urine and drink it, get this recorded (very easy to do today thx to smartphones) and share it with the world.
What the heck is backdate? To Prophet Adam (PBUH)?
Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) has always been recognized as the last, the final messenger of Allah SWT. Nothing wrong or controersial about this statement. Which Muslim anywhere in the world opposes it?
By definition, any body who refuses to agree that Allah (SWT) is the only God and that Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is His messenger is not a Muslim.
Who and where exactly did any Muslim come up with a different definition again?
Hadiths are just hadiths, not protected by Allah (SWT) from distortions or corruptions. They can be compared to christian or judaic or other religious scriptures, none of which remain unaltered, unadulterated, unmodified over the course of millennia.
The Quran is vastly different. It is protected from forgery, modification, adulteration by Allah SWT Himself as promised in the Holy Quran (anybody can look it up, I too can provide the reference if needed, very easy task) and even if all kafir alive today and yet to be born in the future worked together, they can't violate this principle.
We know this because Quran has long been memorized by hundreds of millions, if not billions of Muslims, around the world over more than 1400 years now across various time zones, longitudes and latitudes. Quran recitation competitions hvae been held across the world, participants have appeared from various regions of the world. No issues whatsoever.
At least 5 times a day are verses from the Quran recited, again, around the world. No problems whatsoever. For over 1400 years, Quranic verses have been recited, Muslims travelled to Muslim and non Muslim regions all these times, no issues whatsoever with Quranic verses.
No other book, whether man made or authored by men, or professing to be a scripture, can claim the same.
None of them can claim to remain unadulatered, unmodified, unedited, unchanged over the course of 1400 years and more.