• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

John Tan is Right, xenophobic oppies online creating hardship for Pappie's foreign talents.

Wayne Piew

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
2,869
Points
113
After 13 years in Singapore, 22-year-old Callum Dunne was forced to leave in May. He lost his job, his visa expired and he couldn’t find new employment, leaving him with no option but to return to the UK.
“My entire life is in Singapore,” he said. “My family, my friends, my colleagues. It’s hard to be given a couple weeks to pack up your life and go.”
Callum has built a strong support system of friends here. They took care of him and his family during these difficult times, and he said they were the most “difficult to say goodbye to”.

“I broke my own rule of ‘it’s never goodbye, it’s a see you soon,’ because I really didn’t know when i’ll see them again.”
Many expats have found themselves in Callum’s position. In the first 5 months of this year alone, 60,000 foreigners lost their jobs in Singapore. Foreign employment fell by 5.7% in the first half of 2020, compared to 2.7% in the local workforce. And for the first time since 2003, Singapore has seen a shrink in the population, largely due to non-citizens leaving because of the rising barriers put in place for hiring foreigners.
Scrolling through expat groups on Facebook is a good indicator of the exodus. Dozens of users post daily about moving away, selling furniture, and asking for travel advice.

The majority of expats I spoke to that lost their jobs have built roots in this country, and therefore hope to return soon. But new job opportunities are difficult to come by—foreigner quota restrictions have tightened and minimum salary requirements have increased.
Callum doesn’t blame the government for these regulations that put Singaporeans first. “Many Singaporeans lost their jobs, and they need them back,” he said. “And many of us wouldn’t have jobs if Singaporeans didn’t have theirs.”
119453570_452715612312858_1128121075784377343_n-1-1024x682.jpg

Callum Dunne. Photo courtesy of Next Door Spanish Cafe.

After years in this country, Callum has come to terms with the fact that being a foreigner in Singapore comes with the burden of always having to be prepared to leave. While many assume that expats get visas easily, it is actually the opposite.

He first moved here when he was only 6, after his parents got jobs in Singapore. After his PR was rejected, he switched between a Working Holiday Visa, Dependents Pass, and most recently, an S-Pass.
“Even getting that S-Pass was so hard,” he said. “I worked as a football coach for about a year and a half. They didn’t have the quota to keep me so I lost that job. Then a bar in Boat Quay wanted to hire me but they also didn’t have a quota for foreigners. I finally found a job which could sponsor me in December last year, but I lost it because of the pandemic.”

After spending some of the most significant years of his life in Singapore, Callum hopes Singapore will eventually welcome foreigners again so he can return.
“Foreigners are essential in any country, they help with building cultural awareness,” he said, “From essential work to tourism, foreigners are involved in every aspect of Singapore. They help the country grow and thrive day to day.”
“Whilst there are some negative stigmas about foreigners, none of the companies I have worked in would be at the same level without the diverse workforce they have had behind them.”
rice-media-singapore-expats-retrenchment-edoardo-6-1024x683.jpg


When Australian Kym Grieve decided to leave Australia and follow her partner to Singapore in late 2019, she was forced to give up her career as a successful executive. But she tells me she didn’t plan to be a “trailing spouse for long.”
“I was going to be the ‘support crew’ while we got settled in 2019. My plan was to get a job in 2020 … yeah right.”
Kym has lived in Singapore before, so she is familiar with the obstacles foreigners face when seeking employment. But the hostility towards non-Singaporeans has definitely grown.

In 2011, Kym moved to Singapore to open a retail mobile tech startup with her now ex-husband. The company went on to open in 5 countries across Asia, and by 2016 it worked with approximately 4000 stores and 1500 retail brands.
When I asked Kym why they chose Singapore as the building ground for the company, she said that “Singapore was a very forward thinking place for tech startup development”.
At the time, the government attracted startups to Singapore with grant opportunities. In turn, these companies would create opportunities for Singaporeans and make the local market more competitive.
Beyond the business itself, foreigners like Kym brought a diversity of perspectives and management styles that come from international experience—an attribute many Singaporeans lack.
In 2013, the then-managing director of Microsoft Singapore Helene Auriol said that “MNCs need to connect with the rest of the world … and it’s very challenging to find strong (Singaporean) leaders with a real international background.”
Speaking at the same human resources conference as Auriol, the then Canon Singapore president and chief executive officer Kensaku Konishi said that Singaporeans find it hard to adapt to new environments: “They just complain that it’s different from Singapore.”

If it weren’t for expats coming to fill certain international market knowledge gaps, the urgency for Singaporeans to travel abroad would be much higher.
The industry in Singapore thrives because expats are ready to work here,” explained Rohit Bhattacharya, a 27-year-old who recently moved to Singapore for a consulting job. “If they didn’t, locals would need to go overseas for such jobs, leading to brain drain. That would also have a negative impact on the economy.”

rice-media-singapore-expats-retrenchment-edoardo-7-1024x683.jpg

Rohit Bhattacharya.

Rohit was managing a team in Singapore, and he trained them to apply many of the skills he acquired abroad. Now that he has lost his job, he plans to return to Australia where he was living before.
“Singapore is a place built for a lot of foreign companies to thrive,” he added. “As expats we not only bring talent, but we bring in a good business into the country from where we were before.”

Beyond a personal level, international companies as a whole also contribute to the local economy.
Around the time that Kym opened the startup in Singapore, many MNCs were also expanding their presence in the region, using Singapore as a hub.
Diageo, Kellogg, Nestle, and Unilever among many others made similar moves into Singapore. On top of creating employment opportunities for Singaporeans, many local companies who worked with the international MNCs saw their incomes grow.
Singapore remains a competitive place for international talent, but I don’t know if Kym would feel comfortable opening a company in Singapore (as a foreigner) today.
“What is really messing with my mind right now is not only losing my identity as a successful executive in my own right, but having to actively ignore the anti-foreigner comments online on job opportunities, EPs and so on,” she said.
“These are so misaligned with what the real world looks like now. It seems that a lot of Singaporeans seem to think the expat world still looks like the 1990s ….. it’s not like that anymore.”

Kym is referring to the ‘expat contracts’ that were a norm in Singapore during the 90s and 2000s. These came with privileges such as a school and housing allowance, travel tickets home, a car, and so on. While these packages are rare to find today, the perception of expats among local Singaporeans remains that they come to the country on high payrolls, with the intention to leave after a few years. But research shows that more expats live in Singapore with fewer benefits now, often without employment guarantees from MNCs, and with a much longer-term intent to stay than ever before.
rice-media-singapore-expats-retrenchment-edoardo-2-1024x683.jpg


The integration of foreigners has increasingly improved over the years, but expats who have moved to Singapore in recent months have found it especially hard to do so.
28-year-old UX Designer Kate Sotnychenko moved to Singapore from Ukraine with her husband in 2019. She was retrenched in June, leaving her isolated from the rest of the country.

“Every day I wake up and I apply for new jobs. I send my CV to 10 or 15 companies per day. Some reply, most don’t. The majority of job advertisements say ‘Singaporeans and PRs only.’”
Finding a job in this climate has not been possible for Kate, but that hasn’t stopped her from trying to find her place in the community. Kate started volunteering at Project Luni, an organisation that helps street cats in Singapore.

Kate is also trying to get involved with other volunteering opportunities, but she was shocked to find out that some organisations don’t allow foreigners to participate.“Yesterday I tried to sign up for a beach clean-up volunteering opportunity,” she recalled. “But they said that only Singaporeans and PRs can clean the beaches. I was shocked. Why? If I want to help?”
rice-media-singapore-expats-retrenchment-edoardo-5-1024x683.jpg

Kate Sotnychenko.

“It’s very sad. We’re also a part of this country like everyone else. It’s a multicultural city. I want to work, I want to help and I want to be a part of the community. But they refuse me that, even if I’m doing everything I can.”
“I support the government’s decision to help locals, but I hope that in doing so they don’t forget about others who have made this place their home.”
“What the minister said about foreigners really saddened me,” Kate gushed, referring to when Vivian Balakrishnan said that “the only reason we have foreigners here is to give an extra wind in our sails when the opportunity is there.”
“Now we are in a storm, and we need to shed ballast.”

Earlier in June, The Sunday Times published a survey on people’s perceptions of essential jobs during the pandemic, which ranked artists as the number one least essential job.
“The government literally said we don’t care about foreigners right now,” she says, “And then the people said they don’t care about artists, so I felt like I don’t belong here … like I’ll always be a stranger.”
“I can’t even clean the beach because I’m not Singaporean.”
“I support the government’s decision to help locals in this time, but I hope that in doing so they don’t forget about expats who have made this place their home.”
rice-media-singapore-expats-retrenchment-edoardo-4-1024x683.jpg


While there is nothing wrong with scrutinising immigration policies—especially during a recession—what many foreigners in Singapore have experienced is an overwhelming sense of xenophobia. And the issue with the way these xenophobic sentiments present themselves online is that they turn a complex issue of immigration and people’s livelihoods, into a matter of numbers: How many foreigners are in a company, how many of the local executives are really PRs and not ‘true locals,’ how many of the foreigners come from a specific country and so on.

In the past months, the financial sector’s hiring practices have been placed under scrutiny for not training enough locals in executive positions. In light of this, various banks have come out and said they “keep a local core” in their workforce. In turn, netizens have pushed back by saying that PRs aren’t real Singaporeans.
This kind of discourse reduces people to the colour of their ICs. If yours is pink then you are 100% local and deserving of your job. If you are a PR, you need to prove your ‘localness’—and if you don’t have either of those, then you may as well pack your bags and leave.
People’s experiences cannot be divided so crudely. Many of my ‘foreigner’ friends who grew up here went to local schools and local universities. They maneuver Singapore better than many Singaporeans and have made immense contributions to the local culture and art scenes—yet their PR applications still get rejected. Online, they are reduced to ‘foreigners’ who come to ‘steal jobs from locals,’ because numbers don’t account for their lived experiences.
rice-media-singapore-expats-retrenchment-edoardo-1-1024x683.jpg


But beyond the visa status of a person, we need to ask ourselves why they are employed in the positions they are in. What competitive advantages do they bring to the company? Are they bringing with them a certain level of experience from a different market that is hard to come by locally?
And when a foreigner is employed, are they really stealing a job from a local?

Many foreigners who come to Singapore directly employ and create opportunities for Singaporeans. This can be in the form of direct employment, or by working with local companies and expanding their competitive edge, and in turn profit margin.
Others have made this place a home, so being kicked out of the country literally equates to them losing their identity. In a way, they are a local, so their visa status almost puts them in a more precarious position that any Singaporean could fathom.
If we shut the doors to the outside world, we limit the way in which we can diversify our society. Whether it’s a tech entrepreneur or digital artist, there’s a contribution anyone can make to the community—if only we let them.
As Minister Grace Fu said: “In the worst of times, it is easy to blame someone who is different from ourselves, when it is due to race, religion or nationality. What we must realise is that viruses do not discriminate, people do.”
 
wad talent does callum dumb have? fcuking SPGs?
 
Pfft. just another libtard article from Rice Media. :biggrin:
 
What kind of a free port is this? Biggest employer are foreign companies who set up regional offices.you want them to leave also?
 
My darling Kirsten Han is right again ..... sinkie oppies are fucking xenophobic!

E9C148E9-CDB3-47C3-8356-914B6E36FDE2.jpeg
FB786A55-E9AF-416E-8C1F-43A8F9751553.jpeg

F5AD3DD7-1FB2-4CCB-AA24-39445C9A6AFB.jpeg
94BD8ABA-AFBB-42BF-94BA-BF149A0CB98D.gif
 
The issue is that the PAP makes them feel it is their right to come here.
 
Singapore is the world's best place for expats: study

But two in four could not afford a home in the city-state.

Singapore is the crowd favourite of expats, according to a study by HSBC. It bested New Zealand, Germany, and Canada, amongst others.

The Expat Explorer survey found that Singapore ranked third in economics, sixth for experience categories and 5th in family indicators. The study also noted that 36% of expats in the city state came from Europe, 32% came from the far east, whilst 13% came from south and central Asia.

“Its [Singapore] well-established international trade and investment links, mature financial markets, and strong economic growth make it an ideal home base for business owners and career-focused professionals to tap the growth opportunities in Asia,” HSBC Bank Singapore head of retail banking and wealth management Anurag Mathur said.

Almost half (45%) of them moved to the Lion City to advance their careers. Some were motivated to improve their earnings (38%) and to improve their quality of life (36%).

In terms of work/life balance, more than half thinks that their work/ life balance is the same or worse than it was at home whilst 46% say the levels of stress at work are higher than they experienced in their home market.

For family benefits, 60% of expats believe that their children’s health and wellbeing has improved. However, they are hit by the high cost of living as two in four expats could not afford a home in the city state and have instead bought properties in their home country.
 
Netizens unhappy about Rice Media’s article on expats in Singapore
The article which gained traction online is titled “Why It Sucks to Be An Expat In Singapore Right Now"
83968188_871825043270072_1897157444862214144_o.jpg
FB screengrab: Expats in Singapore
Author
- Advertisement -
Singapore—News and media website Rice Media published an article on Friday (Oct 2) entitled “Why It Sucks to Be An Expat In Singapore Right Now” by staff writer Edoardo Liotta, which has gained traction online, with many Singaporeans sharing and commenting on it.
Netizens are pointing out that amid the unprecedented economic uncertainty of the pandemic, “It sucks to be an expat anywhere in the world.”
Rice Media’s piece focuses on the experiences of expats Callum, Kym, Rohit, and Kate as examples of the hardships foreigners who have lost their jobs in Singapore are going through.
As the government has had to protect more local jobs due to the economic fallout of the pandemic, statistics say that 60,000 foreigners lost their jobs in Singapore as of May of this year, with foreign employment falling by 5.7 per cent vs 2.7 per cent for local employment.
Additionally, the country’s population has fallen for the first time since 2003, and one major reason for this is because of the additional difficulties foreigners are facing in getting hired.
- Advertisement -
The article quotes Australian Kym Grieve as saying that contrary to many people’s thinking, expat packages do not come with the privileges and benefits they did a few decades ago.
And as for Ukrainian Kate Sotnychenko, a UX designer who lost her job in June, she says, “It’s very sad. We’re also a part of this country like everyone else. It’s a multicultural city. I want to work, I want to help and I want to be a part of the community. But they refuse me that, even if I’m doing everything I can.”
Singaporeans responding to the article pointed out that 2020 is hard on practically everyone everywhere, not just expats.
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-7.53.33-AM-300x59.png

And Singapore is by no means the only country that is giving first priority to its citizens.
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-7.52.53-AM-300x75.png
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-7.53.25-AM-300x72.png
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-8.03.14-AM-300x78.png
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-7.57.20-AM-300x61.png

Some took particular notice of the first foreigner mentioned in the article, 22-year-old Callum, pointing out that while he’s had several job opportunities already, most Singaporean males his age are still doing National Service.
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-7.55.42-AM-300x89.png
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-7.57.06-AM-300x66.png
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-8.01.50-AM-300x63.png
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-7.59.10-AM-300x114.png
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-8.01.39-AM-300x78.png

One netizen pointed out that losing employment during tough times is a risk a person takes in agreeing to work abroad.
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-8.01.25-AM-300x95.png

Another said that if locals are being told to learn new skills and retrain, expats should also be willing to be similarly flexible.
Screen-Shot-2020-10-05-at-8.02.16-AM-300x72.png

-/TISG
 
Talk so much cock, go fuck the fake degrees indian ahnehs who steal the lunches from Sinkies.
 
Singaporeans anti-foreigner? The Singapore Business Federation cannot be so ill-informed or naive
Sense And Nonsense by Tan Bah Bah
36729733_1958943770824263_5253267799312171008_n.jpg
From Facebook / Chan Chun Sing
Author
- Advertisement -
The Singapore Business Federation is so worried about “the recent rise in anti-foreigner sentiments” that it hosted a dialogue on October 1 with Chan Chun Sing. Representatives from 16 foreign chambers, including the American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore and the Singapore International Chamber of Commerce, voiced their concern to the Trade and Industry Minister. Quite a gathering of corporate lions.
This “dialogue” looked very much like a public relations event which served nicely the interests of both parties. The manner it was reported in the media showed that neither was yet ready to substantially address the real issues.
The SBF released a statement on its website which was as PR as it could get:
“Singapore’s success has been built on openness and connectivity. The presence of foreign companies and global talent in Singapore contributes to the creation of good jobs for Singaporeans and high-value activities which will have a positive spillover effect in the domestic ecosystem. Remaining open and connected is critical in ensuring Singapore remains relevant and resilient to enhance Singapore’s competitiveness and attractiveness in an increasingly competitive world.”
It then dutifully paraphrased the remarks of Chan (who in turn reiterated exactly the same thing in his Facebook account):
“Responding to the concerns, Minister Chan assured participants that Singapore remains committed to being open and connected to the world, and continues to welcome foreign investments and global talent to build the best team to play for Singapore in the global arena.”
Chan also dutifully flew a small flag for Singaporeans: “At the same time, Minister Chan stressed that the concerns of Singaporeans also deserved to be addressed…Chan welcomed the commitment from participants and their members to adhering to responsible employment practices and strengthening the Singapore core. He also encouraged participants to showcase these efforts, so that more people could better understand the role that foreign companies and global talent play in the development and growth of our economy and our workforce.”
That was it, as far as the public could tell. We understand you, you understand us – and let’s eat and drink to one another’s health and prosperity.
The SBF cannot be so out of touch with what’s happening in Singapore. It must know full well the real situation and not be drawn into or take part in a narrative which seems at odds with the genuine concerns of true-blue Singaporeans.
How can we be anti-foreigner?
Modern Singapore was founded by an English colonialist and later developed by all sorts of races from all over the world. Even if it wants to do, it can never look inward (or be nativist) – that’s just nonsense official Pofma-able disinformation.
What exactly is this anti-foreigner sentiment that is constantly being hurled at poor Singaporeans by its own government?
Is it anti-foreigner to question whether CECA or any other trade agreement has put the job security and expectations of Singaporeans at risk? Is it anti-foreigner to question whether double standards are being practised in ensuring laws are being followed? Is anti-foreigner to highlight the misbehaviour of some expatriates? Is it anti-foreigner for Singaporeans, especially non-Chinese ones, to want our bus captains to able to communicate with non-Chinese Singaporeans?
Is it anti-foreigner for NS-serving male Singaporeans (and their affected family members) to ask what exactly it is that they are serving to protect – the interests of PRs and others? Would they be wasting two years of their lives (and more, doing reservist training) so that they may end up being at a massive disadvantage in their careers and everything else in life? Is it anti-foreigner if they totally resent being told at the same time that they are too cautious and unwilling to “take risks” (such as seek careers outside Singapore), implying they are not competitive enough, compared to risk-taking and hungrier foreigners?
How has it come to past that the victims of an unfair system are being cast as the villains by an establishment – government and business elite – too used to taking its citizens for granted?
Surely, foreign investors cannot be so ill-informed and so out of sync with ground sentiment here that they actually believe Singaporeans are anti-foreigner.
I think the SBF should try and find out what the real situation is – and not rely on the skewed reporting and “opinion” pieces in the beholden and controlled mainstream media.
Unless, of course, employers and businesses are themselves also not interested in what true-blue Singaporeans are unhappy about anyway – and have their own priorities which have the interests of Singaporeans right at the bottom of the totem pole.
I hope not.
Let me recall what the late DPM S Rajaratnam once said when he delivered a speech to mark a birthday dinner for Lee Kuan Yew. He said, from his association with the latter, that he had been given the impression that the late PM would never want to be a lion leading a nation of lambs. He would rather be a lamb leading a nation of lions.
I think, judging by the results of GE2020 and the latest findings of an Institute of Policy Studies survey, true-blue Singaporeans are tired of being lambs.
Tan Bah Bah, consulting editor of TheIndependent.Sg, is a former senior leader writer with The Straits Times. He was also managing editor of a local magazine publishing company
 
Back
Top