• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Jialat.....China Hints Its Troops Could Be Used to Quell Hong Kong Protests

Millions of Honkies migrated to 5 eyes BE and scathered all over their lands before and after 1997... the grass is orways green over the fence, but found out it wasnt... pathetic.

Billions of HK dollars moved out to 5 eyes nations BE and financially mobey hollow out in HK....

The Honkies rich are not getting ahead with the angmohs in BE land. Cannot compete without having corruptions they are lost returned to China...

These are where they can be brought back to China to face crimes if exradition law is in force....

It was the rich fearing the extradtion law may get them death sentenced.

Many protestors are crisis actors trained by Steve Bannon CIA crisis actors companies....

So easy, why CCCP has to worry when crisis actors are having a good time...
 
China rotates new batch of troops into Hong Kong as protesters call for democracy
image: 
This screengrab taken from video released on Aug 29, 2019 from China's state-run CCTV shows People's Liberation Army (PLA) troops for the Hong Kong Garrison arriving on a ship in Hong Kong during a routine rotation of personnel. (Image: AFP/CCTV Handout)
29 Aug 2019 09:37AM (Updated: 29 Aug 2019 05:29PM)
Share this content
  • 32
  • 11
  • 0
Bookmark
BEIJING: China sent fresh troops to Hong Kong Thursday (Aug 29) as part of a "routine" garrison rotation, as the financial hub braced for a new round of violent protests after police refused permission for a mass rally at the weekend.
Hong Kong has been mired in more than three months of political crisis, with police and protesters engaging in increasingly violent clashes, prompting Beijing to ramp up its rhetoric and a public relations campaign against the demonstrations.
Advertisement

Advertisement

Chinese state media on Thursday broadcast pictures and footage of armoured personnel carriers and trucks driving across the Hong Kong border before dawn, describing it as a routine rotation of the garrison stationed in the semi-autonomous city.

image: 
Footage from China's state-run CCTV shows armoured personnel carriers and trucks carrying People's Liberation Army (PLA) troops for the Hong Kong Garrison arriving in Hong Kong during a routine rotation of personnel on Aug 29, 2019. (Photo: AFP/CCTV)

"The Hong Kong Garrison of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) on Thursday morning completed the 22nd rotation since it began garrisoning Hong Kong in 1997," Xinhua news agency reported.
"Approved by the Central Military Commission, the move is normal routine annual rotation in line with the Law of the People's Republic of China on Garrisoning the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, which stipulates that 'the Hong Kong Garrison shall practise a system of rotation of its members'."
Advertisement

Advertisement


READ: Hong Kong police ban mass protest over safety fears
READ: Thousands gather at Chater Garden in Hong Kong for #MeToo protest against police



Asian and Western diplomats watching PLA movements in the former British colony said they had been expecting it.
The rotation came less than 24 hours after police denied permission for a new mass rally planned for Saturday that was expected to draw hundreds of thousands of people to the streets - the 13th consecutive week of protests.
Police have previously denied permission for rallies to take place, but the orders have largely been ignored.
"Before coming ... we learned about the situation of Hong Kong," PLA officer Lieutenant-Colonel Yang Zheng said in a slick PR video. "We've strengthened our training ... to make sure we can fulfill our defence duties."
READ: In 'clear warning', Chinese paramilitary forces exercise near Hong Kong
READ: US 'deeply concerned' by reports of Chinese paramilitary at Hong Kong border

image: 
This screengrab taken from video released on Aug 29, 2019 from China's state-run CCTV shows a ceremony to welcome members of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) for the Hong Kong Garrison upon their arrival in Hong Kong during a routine rotation of personnel. (Image: AFP/CCTV Handout)


Observers estimate the Hong Kong garrison numbers between 8,000 and 10,000 troops split between bases in southern China and a network of former British army barracks in Hong Kong.
Trucks full of white-gloved PLA soldiers rolled into Hong Kong within hours of the 1997 handover, raising questions about their role. They stage frequent drills but have seldom since been seen outside their bases.
Reuters witnesses on Thursday saw significantly more activity in and around the PLA’s Shek Kong military base in the rural New Territories than has been apparent in recent months.

image: 
China's military on August 29 said fresh troops had arrived in Hong Kong as part of a routine "rotation", as the financial hub prepares for more political rallies against Beijing's tightening grip on the city. (Photo: AFP/CCTV)

The heightened activity comes amid multiple warnings by China, who has said it will not "sit by and watch" the unrest unfolding in Hong Kong.
It has also accused the United States and Britain of interfering in its affairs in Hong Kong and has sent clear warnings that forceful intervention is possible.

Hundreds of People’s Armed Police this month conducted exercises at a sports stadium in Shenzhen that borders Hong Kong a day after the US State Department said it was “deeply concerned” about their movements.

image: 
Trucks and armoured personnel carriers are seen outside the Shenzhen Bay stadium in Shenzhen, bordering Hong Kong in China's southern Guangdong province. (STR/AFP)

MORE PROTESTS
This Saturday's rally was called to mark five years since Beijing ruled out universal suffrage for Hong Kong, a decision that sparked 79 days of political protests that became known as the Umbrella Movement.
Civil Human Rights Front leader Jimmy Sham - who said he escaped unhurt after being set upon by masked men with a baseball bat and knife earlier Thursday - said the group would appeal against the police decision.
"You can see the police's course of action is intensifying, and you can see (Hong Kong leader) Carrie Lam has in fact no intention to let Hong Kong return to peace," he said.
Demonstrators have been urged to gather in the city centre and march to the Liaison Office, the department that represents China's central government in Hong Kong, but both aspects, which need permission from authorities, have been banned.
The last rally organised by the CHRF on Aug 18 brought hundreds of thousands of people to the city's main public space.
Despite being banned by police from leaving the area, they later marched peacefully through the streets in one of the first recent protest gatherings to end without major incident.


READ: China warns Hong Kong protesters: 'Those who play with fire will perish by it'
The recent protests were originally ignited by the city's Beijing-backed government trying to pass a Bill allowing extraditions to mainland China, but they have evolved into a wider call for greater democracy and an investigation into allegations of police brutality.
The mainly young protesters say freedoms within the semi-autonomous city, unique within China, are being eroded by Beijing.
The unrest has shown no sign of abating, with protesters locked in a stalemate with the Hong Kong government, which has refused to give in to their demands.
More than 850 people have been arrested since June.
China has been accused of using intimidation, economic muscle and propaganda - including against Hong Kong airline Cathay Pacific as well as the city's metro operator - to constrict support for the protests.
Commentary: It's Hong Kong's elites who have failed the city
The protests have posed the biggest challenge for Communist Party rulers in Beijing since President Xi Jinping took power in 2012.
Beijing is eager to quell the unrest before the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China on Oct 1, when Xi will oversee a large military parade in the Chinese capital.
China also rotated troops in neighbouring Macau, a former Portuguese colony that returned to Chinese rule in 1999.
MORE: Our coverage of the Hong Kong protests
Follow us on Telegram for the latest on Hong Kong: https://t.me/cnalatest
Source: Reuters/AFP/zl
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/hong-kong-protests-china-shenzhen-army-new-troops-11851918
 
Commentary: It's Hong Kong's elites who have failed the city
A powerful, but oft-ignored factor underlying the frustrations of Hong Kong’s people is inequality, say China experts Andrew Sheng and Xiao Geng.

image: 
A man watches a television showing Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam speaking during a live press conference, at a restaurant in Hong Kong on June 18, 2019. (Photo: AFP)
image: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/blob/10881556/b8454001787d67d51dc8645653008ee3/andrew-sheng-thumbnail.png

By Andrew Sheng

image: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/blob/10881558/b838d0b33c55dc2841cbd87fa637b41c/xiao-geng-thumbnail.png

By and Xiao Geng
29 Aug 2019 06:29AM (Updated: 29 Aug 2019 06:30AM)

Share this content
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Bookmark
HONG KONG: Since China regained sovereignty over Hong Kong on Jul 1, 1997, the city has prospered economically, but festered politically.
Now, one of the world’s richest cities is engulfed by protests, which have blocked roads, paralysed the airport, and at times descended into violence.
Advertisement

Advertisement

Far from a uniquely Chinese problem, however, the current chaos should be viewed as a bellwether for capitalist systems that fail to address inequality.
A CLASH OF CULTURES?
In times of crisis, it is easy for emotion to overwhelm reason, and for dramatic and deceptive narratives to take root.
This tendency is exemplified by media reports that frame the unrest as a clash of cultures symbolising a broader global struggle between autocracy and democracy, or references to a “fight between two civilisations,” as Hong Kong legislator Fernando Cheung put it.
Advertisement

Advertisement

Such narratives often treat “democracy” as synonymous with improved welfare – a characterisation that is not borne out by the facts.
READ: Commentary: Could 'black hands' be behind the Hong Kong protests?
READ: Our coverage of the Hong Kong protests

As famed political scientist Francis Fukuyama has conceded, centralised, systems can deliver economic outcomes that are superior to decentralised, inefficient democratic regimes.
It is also worth pointing out that officials like Cheung are free to criticise China’s government on the international stage.

image: 
Protests in Hong Kong have now entered their third month AFP/Anthony WALLACE

A LOOMING MILITARY CRACKDOWN?
Those who think that China’s government will resort to a military-led crackdown forget Sun Tzu’s dictum that winning wars without fighting is the “acme of skill”.
China’s government is well aware that if Hong Kong becomes a political or ideological battleground, peace and prosperity will suffer in both the city and on the mainland.
READ: Commentary: The deepening crisis over the Hong Kong protests
Commentary: Why it’s not in Beijing’s interest to rock the Hong Kong boat

Given this, it is willing to go to great lengths to uphold the “one country, two systems” arrangement that forms the basis of its sovereignty over Hong Kong.
CONSIDER INDEPENDENCE?
What China’s government is not willing to do is consider independence for the city. Like a parent dealing with a frustrated teenager, China views the current upheaval as a family matter that must be resolved internally.
The appeals of some Hong Kong protesters for outsiders like the United States to intervene are not only unhelpful; they fail to appreciate the long and destructive track record of US-led “democracy-building” efforts around the world, from Central America to Central Asia.
The reality is that Hong Kong is already operating as a living experiment in how the rule of law and electoral democracy can work within the Chinese context.

image: 
A view of Hong Kong. (Photo: AFP/PHILIPPE LOPEZ)

The city ranks 16th in the World Justice Project’s Rule of Law Index, right behind Japan and ahead of France (17th), Spain (21st), and Italy (28th). On electoral democracy, however, there are significant challenges, which have little to do with the mainland.
THE UNDERLYING INEQUALITY
A powerful, but oft-ignored factor underlying the frustrations of Hong Kong’s people is inequality.
Hong Kong’s Gini coefficient – in which zero represents maximum equality and one represents maximum inequality – now stands at 0.539, its highest level in 45 years. By comparison, the highest Gini coefficient among the major developed economies is 0.411 (in the US).
READ: Commentary: Behind Hong Kong’s extradition bill protests – a looming divide, growing pessimism about the future

READ: Commentary: How a leaderless movement in Hong Kong went haywire
This inequality is most starkly apparent in housing. The per capita residential space in Hong Kong is just 16 sq m (172 sq ft), compared to 36 sq m (387 sq ft) in Shanghai.
Moreover, whereas nearly 45 per cent of Hong Kong’s residents live in public rental or subsidised housing, 90 per cent of Chinese households own at least one home.

image: 
Hong Kong's housing prices are among the world's most expensive, with many residents living in increasingly cramped conditions at spiralling costs and small businesses struggling to survive sky-high rents. (Photo: AFP/Anthony Wallace)

Yet, despite having fiscal reserves of more than HKD$1.2 trillion (US$147 billion), Hong Kong’s autonomous government has failed to address inequality.
INFLUENCE OF REAL ESTATE INTERESTS
The city’s Legislative Council – whose members are elected through a complicated process based on proportional representation – is too politically and ideologically divided to reach consensus.
Unable to push through tough reforms to subdue vested interests, as China’s government is doing on the mainland, the Council is also vulnerable to the influence of real-estate developers eager to block measures that would lower prices, such as the allocation of land for more public housing.
Some companies are reportedly hoarding large amounts of unused rural land, either directly or through shell companies, precisely to constrain supply.
Hong Kong’s protesters believe they haven’t been heard. But it is the city’s own elites, not China’s government, who have failed them.
Hong Kong’s leaders were so thoroughly out of touch with ordinary people that the protest movement took them by surprise, despite signals from social media and the press.

image: 
Sky-high prices and the cost of living outstrip many ordinary residents' salaries in Hong Kong (Photo: AFP/Anthony WALLACE)

BETTER CHANNELS BETWEEN PUBLIC AND POLICYMAKERS
This means that, beyond addressing concrete problems like high housing prices, Hong Kong will need to reopen channels of communication between the public and policymakers.
This will not be easy – not least because the protest movement lacks any clear leaders. But some consensus on how to move forward as a community will be needed to ensure the government’s legitimacy while it implements needed reforms.
It will take time for Hong Kong to recover from these months of upheaval. But all Chinese, from Beijing to Hong Kong, know that there are no quick fixes or decisive battles.
Progress is a never-ending series of small steps, many of which must be made in difficult conditions. The only way to succeed is with humility, patience, wisdom, and a sense of shared destiny.
Andrew Sheng is Distinguished Fellow of the Asia Global Institute at the University of Hong Kong and a member of the UNEP Advisory Council on Sustainable Finance. Xiao Geng, President of the Hong Kong Institution for International Finance, is a professor and Director of the Research Institute of Maritime Silk-Road at Peking University HSBC Business School.
Source: Project Syndicate/sl
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...d-elites-government-property-tycoons-11847680
 
Millions of Honkies migrated to 5 eyes BE and scathered all over their lands before and after 1997... the grass is orways green over the fence, but found out it wasnt... pathetic.

Billions of HK dollars moved out to 5 eyes nations BE and financially mobey hollow out in HK....

The Honkies rich are not getting ahead with the angmohs in BE land. Cannot compete without having corruptions they are lost returned to China...

sounds about right...

These are where they can be brought back to China to face crimes if exradition law is in force....

It was the rich fearing the extradtion law may get them death sentenced.

interesting.

Many protestors are crisis actors trained by Steve Bannon CIA crisis actors companies....

So easy, why CCCP has to worry when crisis actors are having a good time...

Steve Bannon so powderful meh? Like a clown. :roflmao:
 
Actually commies are the best at killing their own be it cina or not.


communism :poop:

mass murder disguised as justice for the masses. :thumbsdown:

perversely the product of a high-minded elitist from a wealthy family who never worked a proper job a day in his life. that's what happens when too much money and reading and not enough real world experience.
 
Last edited:
Nothing will happen lah. The West bo seed one lah. :biggrin:
Yes nothing will happen as in the tiongs won’t dare to send in their troops.
Tiongs can’t afford the negative PR....they spend much time and money to build up their image to the world already
 
communism :poop:

mass murder disguised as justice for the masses. :thumbsdown:

perversely the product of a high-minded elitist from a wealthy family who never worked a proper job a day in his life. that's what happens when too much money and reading and not enough real world experience.
The worse thing is communism is a foreign ang mor ideology...n the ah tiongs are using it to say it is cina..wat a joke
 
Politics
World

Why does Beijing have a military garrison in Hong Kong and what could that mean for protesters?
BY MAX WALDEN AND MICHAEL LI
UPDATED ABOUT AN HOUR AGO
Email Facebook Twitter WhatsApp
Chinese troop demonstration
PHOTO Chinese troops have been garrisoned in Hong Kong for 22 years.
FLICKR: CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF
As more than three months of protests in Hong Kong have continued unabated, speculation has grown that Beijing could send security forces to quash unrest.

Key points:
Chinese military personnel have been stationed in Hong Kong since 1997
By law, Hong Kong's Government must request the assistance of mainland troops
Experts say a military intervention remains unlikely but cannot be ruled out
While most experts say it is still unlikely China would mobilise its People's Liberation Army (PLA) in Hong Kong, a build-up of vehicles and personnel in neighbouring Shenzhen has fuelled discussion about the possibility of an impending Tiananmen Square-like violent crackdown.

On Thursday, China's state news agency Xinhua reported the PLA had undertaken a "normal routine annual rotation", sending new troops to Hong Kong to maintain "prosperity and stability" in the city.

State media also broadcast a slick PR video of armoured vehicles and trucks driving across the Hong Kong border.

Despite claims the rotation was "routine", the timing has amplified fears Beijing could be preparing to intervene directly in Hong Kong with the PLA.

But what's in the garrison? What are the rules around an intervention? What might be the consequences?

What's the deal with the Hong Kong garrison?
Hong Kong skyline with the boxy PLA garrison building in the foreground in front of blue skies.
PHOTO The PLA's headquarters is a potent symbol of the transition from British to Chinese rule.

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS
The PLA's headquarters are built on prime Hong Kong real estate in the financial hub of Admiralty, just a stone's throw from Hong Kong's Legislative Council building — the city's parliament.

Built in 1979, the 28-storey tower was originally the British Army's head office in Hong Kong. It was once named the Prince of Wales building.


This was until mid-1997, when Hong Kong changed hands from London to Beijing under "one country, two systems", and the PLA moved in.

The garrison's function has recently shifted, even before the start of 2019's pro-democracy protests.

In mid-2017, China's top military brass signalled the PLA's presence in Hong Kong was no longer merely symbolic.

It now hosts a combat-ready force.

"The PLA's garrison in Hong Kong is not only a military garrison; more importantly, it is a political garrison," wrote several senior PLA officials, as quoted by the South China Morning Post.

"[The garrison] has changed from being a symbolic presence to a show of force, from image building to combat capability development," they added.

It is now estimated to house between 5,000 and 10,000 troops between Shenzhen and a network of more than a dozen old British barracks in Hong Kong, equipped with the kinds of armoured vehicles shown crossing the border this week.

"It looks like they might've boosted their numbers a bit, but there are no new facilities that we know of. So it's not a major expansion," said Dr Graeme Smith, a researcher from the Australian National University.

"They wouldn't be able to repel a full-blown invasion of Hong Kong."
The presence of the PLA is rather intended for "if it is deemed there is a separatist element that needs suppressing," he said.

Under what circumstances can the military crack down?
When rotating troops and equipment through the former British barracks in Hong Kong last year, the Chinese Government said that its supplies and personnel numbers were "maintained with no change".

This caveat was missing from Thursday's announcement.

Armored personnel carriers of China's People's Liberation Army drive down a highway.
PHOTO Xinhua released images and video of armoured vehicles crossing the border into Hong Kong.

AP: YUAN JUNMIN VIA XINHUA
In a statement on Thursday, China's Ministry of National Defence said troops moving into Hong Kong "are determined, confident and capable of fulfilling the duties and missions entrusted by the Garrison Law to safeguard Hong Kong's long-term prosperity, stability and long-term stability".

"The fresh [troops] have been trained and carried out studies to master military skills and knowledge about the general situation in Hong Kong and relevant laws," Xinhua wrote.

Hong Kong's Garrison Law, effective from day one of Chinese rule, declares that the garrison "shall not interfere in the local affairs of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region".

Would China send troops to Hong Kong?
Would China send troops to Hong Kong?
As the protest movement in Hong Kong grows, everyone is asking the same question: would Beijing send in troops?
Nevertheless, the law allows that the Hong Kong Government "may, when necessary, ask" Beijing to provide assistance "in the maintenance of public order" or for disaster relief.

Many observers say that the hand of Hong Kong's Government and its beleaguered leader, Carrie Lam, would be forced by Beijing if push came to shove.

An adviser to Ms Lam told the ABC earlier this month that if the protests "endangered" Hong Kong, she would be likely to call upon the PLA to "quell" unrest.

"If Beijing wants to deploy its troops in Hong Kong, Beijing will simply ring her up and say 'hey, you better request our assistance'," Martin Lee of the United Democrats of Hong Kong recently told NPR.

"And of course, we are sure that she would not dare to say no."

Military intervention against pro-democracy rallies, especially if they are violent, therefore, is a real possibility.

Chinese People's Liberation Army soldiers march in a line holding their guns up straight.
PHOTO The PLA has remained in barracks since protests began, leaving Hong Kong's police force to deal with the protests.

AP: KIN CHEUNG
How might an intervention unfold and what would be the consequences?
Mobilising PLA troops against Hong Kong civilian protesters would effectively mean the death of "one country, two systems", which is supposed to last until 2047.

This would have major political implications domestically and for China's international standing.

According to Dr Smith, China sending in the PLA would "really be shooting themselves in the foot, because what makes Hong Kong special — it's passively understood — is that this does not happen".

The paramilitary People's Armed Police, who have been shown doing riot training in neighbouring Shenzhen and who have been used to suppress separatist movements in Xinjiang and Tibet, are more likely to be used against Hong Kong civilians, he said.

Nevertheless, statements from officials and state media denouncing the protesters as "criminals", crossing "red lines" through "intolerable violence" add to the perception Beijing wants to convey — that armoured police or troops on the streets can't be ruled out.

A national defence white paper issued by Beijing in July declared the PLA vowed to take all necessary military measures to defeat separatists.

Nationalist rage and Jackie Chan
Nationalist rage and Jackie Chan
"I read news about Hong Kong and I think they are really out of control. The young people stopped working to protest."
Some argue that Hong Kong's reduced economic importance for the mainland means Beijing would be more likely to take this gamble.

While Hong Kong's economy was equivalent to almost a third of China's entire economy in 1993, it is now worth less than 3 per cent. Neighbouring Shenzhen's economy overtook Hong Kong's last year.

But the Special Administrative Region does maintain its status as an important global financial capital and the gateway for foreign businesses to invest in mainland China.

Whether Beijing mobilises PLA boots on the ground in Hong Kong would thus be a drastic, but not impossible, decision.
 
Stop hinting and just do it. CCP does not dare to act, protestors know this and are pushing back hard. They will rather the Fragrant Harbour burn than to gift it to the commies.

Kidnapping young joshua off the streets stinks of desperation. Employing mafia tactics shows the character of the CCP.

No one wants them in charge of the world.
 
KNN very lousy management from both sides shows that both have lost their way KNN wasting away time resource and 精神 KNN now should call for a show down meeting to have a final result KNN i.e

Protesor's leader : lai lah you thought we scare ah KNN
govt : lai lah you thought we dare not ah KNN
Surely there need to be life and social national status to sacrifice if not protest for fuck KNN they don't know nothing in this world comes free meh KNN if cannot decide who to die first then use the traditional 抽死牽 KNN
 
Last edited:
Why does Beijing have a military garrison in Hong Kong and what could that mean for protesters?
Updated yesterday at 2:57pm
11464796-3x2-460x307.jpg
PHOTO Chinese troops have been garrisoned in Hong Kong for 22 years. FLICKR: CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF
As more than three months of protests in Hong Kong have continued unabated, speculation has grown that Beijing could send security forces to quash unrest.
On Thursday, China's state news agency Xinhua reported the PLA had undertaken a "normal routine annual rotation", sending new troops to Hong Kong to maintain "prosperity and stability" in the city.
State media also broadcast a slick PR video of armoured vehicles and trucks driving across the Hong Kong border.
Despite claims the rotation was "routine", the timing has amplified fears Beijing could be preparing to intervene directlyin Hong Kong with the PLA.
But what's in the garrison? What are the rules around an intervention? What might be the consequences?
What's the deal with the Hong Kong garrison?
11464998-3x2-460x307.jpg
PHOTO The PLA's headquarters is a potent symbol of the transition from British to Chinese rule. WIKIMEDIA COMMONS
The PLA's headquarters are built on prime Hong Kong real estate in the financial hub of Admiralty, just a stone's throw from Hong Kong's Legislative Council building — the city's parliament.
Built in 1979, the 28-storey tower was originally the British Army's head office in Hong Kong. It was once named the Prince of Wales building.
This was until mid-1997, when Hong Kong changed hands from London to Beijing under "one country, two systems", and the PLA moved in.
In mid-2017, China's top military brass signalled the PLA's presence in Hong Kong was no longer merely symbolic.
It now hosts a combat-ready force.
"The PLA's garrison in Hong Kong is not only a military garrison; more importantly, it is a political garrison," wrote several senior PLA officials, as quoted by the South China Morning Post.
"[The garrison] has changed from being a symbolic presence to a show of force, from image building to combat capability development," they added.
It is now estimated to house between 5,000 and 10,000 troops between Shenzhen and a network of more than a dozen old British barracks in Hong Kong, equipped with the kinds of armoured vehicles shown crossing the border this week.
"It looks like they might've boosted their numbers a bit, but there are no new facilities that we know of. So it's not a major expansion," said Dr Graeme Smith, a researcher from the Australian National University.
"They wouldn't be able to repel a full-blown invasion of Hong Kong."​
The presence of the PLA is rather intended for "if it is deemed there is a separatist element that needs suppressing," he said.
Under what circumstances can the military crack down?
When rotating troops and equipment through the former British barracks in Hong Kong last year, the Chinese Government said that its supplies and personnel numbers were "maintained with no change".
This caveat was missing from Thursday's announcement.
11465308-3x2-460x307.jpg
PHOTO Xinhua released images and video of armoured vehicles crossing the border into Hong Kong. AP: YUAN JUNMIN VIA XINHUA
In a statement on Thursday, China's Ministry of National Defence said troops moving into Hong Kong "are determined, confident and capable of fulfilling the duties and missions entrusted by the Garrison Law to safeguard Hong Kong's long-term prosperity, stability and long-term stability".
"The fresh [troops] have been trained and carried out studies to master military skills and knowledge about the general situation in Hong Kong and relevant laws," Xinhua wrote.
Hong Kong's Garrison Law, effective from day one of Chinese rule, declares that the garrison "shall not interfere in the local affairs of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region".
Nevertheless, the law allows that the Hong Kong Government "may, when necessary, ask" Beijing to provide assistance "in the maintenance of public order" or for disaster relief.
Many observers say that the hand of Hong Kong's Government and its beleaguered leader, Carrie Lam, would be forced by Beijing if push came to shove.
An adviser to Ms Lam told the ABC earlier this month that if the protests "endangered" Hong Kong, she would be likely to call upon the PLA to "quell" unrest.
"If Beijing wants to deploy its troops in Hong Kong, Beijing will simply ring her up and say 'hey, you better request our assistance'," Martin Lee of the United Democrats of Hong Kong recently told NPR.
"And of course, we are sure that she would not dare to say no."
Military intervention against pro-democracy rallies, especially if they are violent, therefore, is a real possibility.
11376420-3x2-460x307.jpg
PHOTO The PLA has remained in barracks since protests began, leaving Hong Kong's police force to deal with the protests. AP: KIN CHEUNGHow might an intervention unfold and what would be the consequences?
Mobilising PLA troops against Hong Kong civilian protesters would effectively mean the death of "one country, two systems", which is supposed to last until 2047.
This would have major political implications domestically and for China's international standing.
According to Dr Smith, China sending in the PLA would "really be shooting themselves in the foot, because what makes Hong Kong special — it's passively understood — is that this does not happen".
The paramilitary People's Armed Police, who have been shown doing riot training in neighbouring Shenzhen and who have been used to suppress separatist movements in Xinjiang and Tibet, are more likely to be used against Hong Kong civilians, he said.
Nevertheless, statements from officials and state media denouncing the protesters as "criminals", crossing "red lines" through "intolerable violence" add to the perception Beijing wants to convey — that armoured police or troops on the streets can't be ruled out.
A national defence white paper issued by Beijing in July declared the PLA vowed to take all necessary military measures to defeat separatists.
Some argue that Hong Kong's reduced economic importance for the mainland means Beijing would be more likely to take this gamble.
While Hong Kong's economy was equivalent to almost a third of China's entire economy in 1993, it is now worth less than 3 per cent. Neighbouring Shenzhen's economy overtook Hong Kong's last year.
But the Special Administrative Region does maintain its status as an important global financial capital and the gateway for foreign businesses to invest in mainland China.
Whether Beijing mobilises PLA boots on the ground in Hong Kong would thus be a drastic, but not impossible, decision.
11416320-3x2-220x147.jpg
VIDEO 0:14 Chinese military vehicles assembling near Hong Kong border ABC NEWSPosted yesterday at 2:06pm
 
There is no way that Carrie Lam would back down. She wanted but she couldn’t. Either the movement fizzled out through sheer exhaustion and mass arrests or if it turns violent the PLA moves in with a cooked up reason.

Those youths won’t win. And each year up to 2047 the commies just raise something more contentious. Now everything that HK government do is seen as pro China and undermining the democracy guaranteed under the treaty. But there isn’t supposed to be democracy w China is it ?

China don’t care it half of HK leaves. They can easily fill that void with chinks coming down from north. It’s HK that will stagnant while Shenzhen and Shanghai prosper.
 
There is no way that Carrie Lam would back down. She wanted but she couldn’t. Either the movement fizzled out through sheer exhaustion and mass arrests or if it turns violent the PLA moves in with a cooked up reason.

Those youths won’t win. And each year up to 2047 the commies just raise something more contentious. Now everything that HK government do is seen as pro China and undermining the democracy guaranteed under the treaty. But there isn’t supposed to be democracy w China is it ?

China don’t care it half of HK leaves. They can easily fill that void with chinks coming down from north. It’s HK that will stagnant while Shenzhen and Shanghai prosper.

The world is eagerly waiting for the Ah Tiong army to kill the protesters. Maybe WW3 breaks out as a consequence. Let the PLA start the killing.
 
Back
Top