• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Jaslyn Go questioned by police

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
http://www.singapore-window.org/sw00/000310a4.htm

[SIZE=-1]It was this issue that caused the dispute between you and the government?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1]Yes. But I don't want to go into details and upset everybody. The thing is that the elected president is supposed to protect the reserves, but he was not told what these are until five years later. From the day the Constitution was amended in 1991 to provide for an elected president, he was supposed to fulfil that role. My predecessor, Wee Kim Wee, although he was not elected, was supposed to play that role during the last two years of his term. But he did not actively check. So, when I came in in 1993, I asked for all this information about the reserves. It took them three years to give it to me. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]The holdup was for administrative reasons? [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Either that or they did not think there was any urgency. You see, if you ask me to protect the reserves, then you've got to tell me what I'm supposed to protect. So I had to ask. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Why did they not want to tell you?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]I do not know. Don't ask me, because I don't have the answer. I've been asking them. In fact, in 1996, exactly halfway through my term, I wrote prime minister Goh a letter. At that time, everybody was expecting a general election in December or January. After the election, a new government would be sworn in. When that happens, all the reserves, whether past or current, become past reserves and are locked up on the changeover date. As president, I have to safeguard them and they can only be drawn upon with my permission. So I said to Mr Goh: It's already halfway through my term, but until today I still don't know all these figures about the reserves.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]So the government had been stonewalling you, the president, for three years?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Yes. What happened actually was, as you know, in accounting, when you talk about reserves, it's either cash reserves or assets reserves. The cash side is straightforward: investment, how many million dollars here and there, how much comes from the investment boards and so on. That was straightforward -- but still we had to ask for it. For the assets, like properties and so on, normally you say it's worth $30 million or $100 million or whatever. But they said it would take 56-man years to produce a dollar-and-cents value of the immovable assets. So I discussed this with the accountant-general and the auditor-general and we came to a compromise. The government would not need to give me the dollar-and-cents value, just give me a listing of all the properties that the government owns. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]They agreed?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Well, yes, they agreed, but they said there's not the time for it. It took them a few months to produce the list. But even when they gave me the list, it was not complete. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]It seems the Singapore government does not know its own assets?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Yes. It's complicated. It's never been done before. And for the assets of land, I can understand why. Every piece of land, even a stretch of road, is probablysubdivided into many lots. There are 50,000 to 60,000 lots and every one has a number. If you want to value them all, it would take a long time. In the past, they have just locked everything up and assumed it is all there. But if I am to protect it, at least I want to know the list. [/SIZE]
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[SIZE=-1]When they eventually gave you the list -- the incomplete list, did you have enough staff to do the checking and other work?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]No, I did not. I only had one administrative staffer and two part-timers from the auditor-general's office. For things like approving the budget of statutory boards, the auditor-general's office would normally go through that for me. They are very good. They check on everything. And they query and ask for information. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]For government financial policy matters that you had a veto over, did you get all the details?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]They finally came with an executive summary to say that they had checked through all this, and that this is what they have, this is how much they are going to spend, and that it won't need any draw from the reserves -- or that there's likely to be a draw. There never was a draw during my time, but there were instances where it was a bit dicey whether the budgets of one or two statutory boards would require a draw. But finally we resolved that. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Eventually then, with the list of properties and the executive summaries, you were kept informed?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]I wouldn't be able to say that. Even in my last year as president, I was still not being informed about some ministerial procedures. For example, in April last year, the government said it would allow the sale of the Post Office Savings Bank POSB to DBS Bank. In the past, when there was no elected president, they could just proceed with this kind of thing. But when there is an elected president you cannot, because the POSB is a statutory board whose reserves are to be protected by the president. You cannot just announce this without informing him. But I came to know of it from the newspaper. That is not quite right. Not only that, but they were even going to submit a bill to parliament for this sale and to dissolve the POSB without first informing me. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]What did you do?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]My office went to tell them that this was the wrong procedure. You've got to do this first, do that first, before you can do this. It was question of principle and procedure. We had to bring all this to their attention. That they cannot forget us. It's not that we are busybodies, but under the Constitution we have a role to play and a responsibility. Sometimes in the newspaper I came to know of things that I am responsible for, but if it had not been reported in the newspaper I would not know about it. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]You must have been pretty angry that this was still happening in your last year as president?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Yes, I was a bit grumpy. And maybe not to the liking of the civil service. They did not like what I said. But I have to be a watchdog all the time, you see. So this is where they are supposed to help me to protect the reserves. And not for me to go and watch out when they do right or wrong. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Under the Constitution, you have the right to all the information available to the cabinet.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Yes. That's right. And I sourced much information from the cabinet papers. But they are not used to it. So I said: I understand, it's something new, and I know you don't like my interference and busybody checking up and so on. But under the Constitution it is my job to do that. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Despite all this, it was widely believed that you wanted to run again for a second six-year term as president?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]No, I'd been telling my friends since late 1998 that my inclination was not to stand for re-election. But of course, life is unpredictable. In March last year, I went to Stanford and my American doctor confirmed that my cancer was in complete remission. He is very experienced, a world authority on my sickness. So I was fine after my treatment. I gave a complete report to the prime minister and we discussed it. I told him that my inclination was not to stand, but that I'd make the announcement later on. Then the cabinet met and they decided that if I were to stand again, they would not support me. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]You had been given a clean bill of health, yet your former colleagues would not support you. Did that annoy you?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]I told the prime minister over lunch: Well, I don't need your cabinet support. If I want to stand, whether I do or not, it will be my personal decision. And I'll make that decision nearer the date of the presidential election -- because I have another checkup in June, July, and I want to know my latest position. Also my wife was sick with cancer and we knew that if she died, it would be difficult for me to stand without a first lady. She felt very apologetic and that was another reason why my inclination was not to stand. I hoped that if I stepped down I would have more time to be with my wife, because her prognosis was not very good. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]By waiting until July to announce your decision, were you ruffling the government for the way they had treated you?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Maybe so. Maybe it was my miscalculation that my stated inclination not to stand again had not been good enough for them. But I had been telling that to all my friends. And I did not want to tell people my wife was dying, either. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]But the government worried that you might suddenly decide to run again.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]No, I made it very clear and I called a press conference in July to tell everybody. [/SIZE]But I believe some people were still afraid that I might turn up on nomination day. Even friends asked me if I might do that. How could they? I had given my word that I would not stand.

[SIZE=-1]A straw poll apparently indicated you would beat the government's candidate, S.R. Nathan, if you had stood.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Yes. But I gave my word that I would not run. And I don't think it's right. I'm a very old-fashioned man. Also, my wife passed away in September. And I became more sceptical about all these medical reports. Well, not sceptical, but certainly I find life more unpredictable than I thought. Full of uncertainties. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]In the end you were happy to stand down?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Yes, I'd been preparing for that psychologically since late 1998. I was quite happy when the decision was made, happy to return to private life to do the work that I enjoy. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]How are your relations with PM Goh these days?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]They are okay. I just had lunch with him last week. I can't invite him now, so he invited me. When I was president, we took turns to invite each other for lunch in the Istana. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Did Senior Minister Lee join you?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]No, we did that separately. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]Lee spoke out against you last year. How are your relations with him now?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]We've never quarrelled. [/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]It's said that your recalcitrance upset him and your former colleagues, leaving you estranged and bitter?[/SIZE]

[SIZE=-1]I would not call it recalcitrant. I mentioned some of the problems -- or many of the problems -- that I faced. If they regard that as an attack on the government and on the civil service, then that is for them to interpret. The prime minister and I spoke at my farewell reception. We agreed that we would say what we have to say. I think it came out well. He said that my statements, and his rebuttal in parliament, were probably a good thing. They showed the transparency of the system. I stand by what I said. [/SIZE]


Published in the ASIAWEEK[SIZE=-1] March 10, 2000.[/SIZE]
 

Cestbon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
otc%20pic%202.JPG


And that's what the Old Fart told me before I left...

http://www.singapore-window.org/sw99/90730aw.htm

"Upon taking office in 1993, he requested an accounting of Singapore's vast assets, financial as well as physical. The accountant-general initially responded that it would take "52 man-years" to produce a complete list..."

So many reason. Just hire 52 man to do the accounting and will finnish in 1 year time. Problem solve. :biggrin:
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
SDP is already putting lots of work to promo their new postergirl. why is the promotion continuing over this site?

why would one keep defending for her. one such as this:
Re: Infraction for leetahbar: Rude

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My blog: (censored)
Thanks to: birdie8819, Tailok, ah guan, Empress LaMei for upping my rep points


so who's more revealing than anybody else here?

THE POWER OF FLIRT & DESTROY - do not underestimate it. you won't even realise u were already under that spell until the payback day. :(
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
SDP is already putting lots of work to promo their new postergirl. why is the promotion continuing over this site?

why would one keep defending for her. one such as this:
Re: Infraction for leetahbar: Rude

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My blog: (censored)
Thanks to: birdie8819, Tailok, ah guan, Empress LaMei for upping my rep points


so who's more revealing than anybody else here?

THE POWER OF FLIRT & DESTROY - do not underestimate it. you won't even realise u were already under that spell until the payback day. :(

example of HYPOCRISY....i left out the lst half part:
NgEjay
Alfrescian (S) Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 129
My Reputation:Points: 27 / Power: 4


Infraction for leetahbar: Rude

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Post: SPG Slut Wearing Sexually Suggestive Clothes Outside Police Station
User: leetahbar
Infraction: Rude
Points: 2

Administrative Note:
Quote:
You were rude to clinton666, who has the freedom of speech to comment as he likes, even though I disagree with most of what he/she says.
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
if SDP new poster girl's incident is compared to our late peoples' president, something is terriblly wrong!!

OTC was indeed concerned for peasants while the other just wayang for attention with pretended concern. then again, there are more wayang to all her f&D supporters, what do all these have proven to those who are witnessing it?

invisiblity is really a sin when used in the wrong concept to delude, misguide and exploit peasants' emotion for personal glorification.
 

annexa

Alfrescian
Loyal
So SPCA distribute phamplets leh? Their cause is be nice to animals lah.

I got church people come my house give phamplet also, if I call, will they get arrest? Their cause is go church. Their church. And they purposely pick Chinese families with Taoist or Buddhist items one. This one can also charge under sedition act right?

Got Falungong people distribute newspaper, also for a cause mah.

Shopping center a lot distribute flyer also. Their cause is visit their outlet mah.

How come all these police no catch?
 

LaMei

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hi Makapaaa...

thanks for posting this article here..

hope to bring about the awareness to the readers that our 1st world SPF have misplaced priority..

and for those encouraging words from some of the forumers - thank you for your kind words..your support is the reason that keep us going.. :smile:
 

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sometimes, not to know is better than to know. :smile: ????

i heard that if u dunno her, she would be very nice and apply DARLING, DEAR and even SWEETHEART.... basic stance of flirt&destroy. once u really know her, all her nastiness will show.

just see the clones (maybe her clones) are enthusiastically defending for her and rumba her into multiple orgasms :biggrin:
 

Wobble

Alfrescian
Loyal
aiyoh..diam diam lah...

at least she is willing to show up for causes she believe in lah....

paing...better than bapoks who stay at home..knowing how to criticise...
 

popdod

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is always easier to fall back to our comfort zone ..
rather than to try sthg new...going for a CHANGE.

:o :biggrin: :o
 
Top