i just found out yesterday there's one huge hole in the minimum wage law in sillycon valley. both private and pubic sector workers are not paid the minimum wage if they don't fulfill the definition of a full-time employee (full-time in californicate means at least 40 hours of work a week). these are part timers who fill the void and holes in county and city jobs such as in social services, home care for the elderly, food pantries, school helpers, etc. they are not exactly "volunteers" but they volunteer for low pay or a few dollars below minimum wage. for pubic sector part timers, they receive health, disability, and insurance benefits though from the local govs. in the private sector, zilch and good luck! double standard? or a better question is "what is the true motive of the minimum wage?" it doesn't apply to millions of union workers (seiu in particular) in the state, counties, and cities as they are paid well above the minimum wage with full benefits and sextra allowances for overtime. it doesn't apply to the millions of tech workers. it doesn't apply to millions of part timers and contractors making ends meet. who are left? full timers at self-proprietorships, sme's, retail, non-unionized workers in nursing homes, hotels, event centers, cafeterias, landscape companies, etc. what is transpiring is that these already stressed businesses are not only laying off full-time workers, reducing hours in order to skirt the minimum wage rule, but also closing down altogether. what has the minimum wage law done in sillycon valley? almost every business, contractor, state, county, and city gov departments are hiring part timers or converting full time workers to part timers to avoid minimum wage rules from kicking in and stay within their respective (tight) budgets. who becomes the (new) victim of the law? the poor, out-of-date, non-unionized worker without the skills, education, training, and intellect to find a more rewarding job. they end up working less and earning less.