Help me understand this. The combined armies of Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq attacked Israel when they know they did not have weapons?
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Israeli Soldiers Kena Attacked By Hordes Of Savages! Macam Like 'Black Hawk Down' Except Hawks Still Flying And Fired Missiles At Savages!
- Thread starter JohnTan
- Start date
In 1948, they were not in Palestine. Palestine was a British colony. Arabs had no armies to speak of.
Equip them today with the same weapons and you will find the zionists hurrying away to Europe, which will deafeat the original purpose of moving Jews out of Europe to Palestine.
The yemenis are arabs. Some are sunnis, some shiites. It was them who sailed all the way to china to trade. They had frankincense which were in demand.
So you're saying that the persians are actually yemenis?
Arabs had organized armies by 1948. Most of them have been independent for a few years and have modern soviet weapons imported openly in large numbers.
Your moslem fakestinians didn't even come into the political scene until the 1960s.
Very funny, the Arabs were armed with advanced weapon by Soviet Union and launched surprise attack in the Yom Kippur War. Yet they almost lost Cairo if not for Soviet Union begging for a ceasefire.
Too bad for the Arabs because they didn't realise the Jews were armed by the one true and living God. The Arabs will forever lose against Israel.
But the yemenis that sailed to india and china were sunnis. The tamils who became muslins are not part of the turkish horde that initialy invaded india and Pakistan.
Sultan is a turk influence so dunno why malays used it. Perhaps influence from india.
Influences of Zheng He's voyagesEdit
Stamps of Indonesia commemorating Zheng He's voyages to secure the maritime routes, usher urbanisation and assist in creating a common identity
Zheng He is credited to have settled Chinese Muslim communities in Palembang and along the shores of Java, the Malay Peninsula, and the Philippines. These Muslims allegedly followed the Hanafi school in the Chinese language.[40] This Chinese Muslim community was led by Hajji Yan Ying Yu, who urged his followers to assimilate and take local names.
Malays still follow hanafi school of thoughts so reason why malays stop eating pork can be traced to chinese influence.
Its a army in name but not in skill.arabs had no army when under turkish rule.
The Muslims had an army, they were part of Hitler's Nazi Army. Talk about always on the losing side. God is giving you ample warning.
Germans should know the arabs have forgotten how to fight. They can only hit you from the back like what they are currently doing. Th arabs can shout all they want but that spirit that took them to europe and central asia is not there anymore.
Those are not Palestinians. You equate Egypt, Syria as Palestinians? If Palestinians were equipped equally, the Zionist would have zero chance.
This I have to agree. And that god isn't Jesus. You will be aghast at the names Jews throw at Jesus.
Actually they are. The arab palestinians own view Israel or Palestine as part of southern syria. That was partially why Syria went to war against Israel in 1948.
moslems don't believe in fair fights. When moslems had the upper hand militarily, did they give their opponents a chance to equip equally?
The arab army is so useless that it makes us wonder about the myths about arabs being able to fight well long time ago.
A l9og time ago they were liberators against tyrannical roman rule. They had something to fight for. Today, would anyone fight for a authoritarian religion? I doubt it. People want freedom from oppression.
Syria was under french mandate. Palestine under british.
Normally french would set up a republic and british, monarchies, which still exist all over gulf region.
Ok whatever you say, you are saying the professional armies of all the Arab countries are dumber than the so called "Palestinians".
When the gunmen were forced to leave under a truce, Israelis allowed Christian militia to butcher Palestinian refugees who were unarmed.
Modern Syria gained independence in April 1946. They had a two-yeard head start over modern Israel in buying weapons and forming a modern army.
many moslems are fighting for an authoritarian islam. These moslems want the freedom to oppress other people. And they view any attempts to stop them from oppressing others as islamophobia.
Similar threads
