• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

is this what u voted for? ask simple question they dont answer and say its sensitive???

kaninabuchaojibye

Alfrescian
Loyal
No PR data by nationalities as it would create ‘negative sensitivities’ - Shanmugam

Mon, 5 July 2021, 11:43 pm

SINGAPORE — Singapore does not publish breakdowns of its permanent resident population by nationality as doing so may have implications on specific groups of PRs and create bilateral sensitivities with their country of origin, said Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam on Monday (5 July).

Shanmugam was responding in a written parliamentary reply to questions by Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh on the numerical breakdown by nationality of Singapore's PRs from each of the top 20 countries and further sub-divided by gender, and how many who were PRs for 10 and 20 years have not applied for citizenship at least once.

Singapore's PR population is about 45 per cent male and 55 per cent female.

Shanmugam said that a large number of the PRs come from Singapore’s “geographically nearest” neighbours.

“Given our history, it has been our assessment that releasing the data of country of origin of our PRs will both create negative sensitivities with other countries; and may affect the flow of PRs from such countries,” he added.

About 60 per cent of the persons granted PR were from Southeast Asia, followed by about 34 per cent from other Asian countries, and the remaining 6 per cent from other countries, according to the Population in Brief 2020, which was based on the PR grants in 2019.

Singapore’s immigration policy is “carefully calibrated”, and it has kept the size of its PR population stable at around half a million for a number of years, Shanmugam said. About 58 per cent of them have been PRs for 10 years or more, and 18 per cent have been PRs for at least 20 years.

“PRs contribute to Singapore’s economy and society in many ways. Many are also spouses of Singaporeans and parents of Singaporean children. Many go on to apply for our citizenship, and some are eventually granted. We are very strict to whom we grant citizenship,” Shanmugam added.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Major Chinese community gahmen shd not have Indians in them. Indians are not good race to start with.

Destructive race just look at their own country you know. Chests, and not a cheat you are not Indians.

Multicultural can exist just minus the bloody cheat Indians...
 

millim6868

Alfrescian
Loyal
How i wish i PR in sg ,enjoying same status of cotizen except NS n also get screwed always ,look at covid situation now ,better be a PR n enjoy freebies treatment
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Totalitarian regimes' first instinct for potentially bad/embarrassing news is to hide, spin or deflect.

If you want a one party 'bao gar liao' system similar to China's CCP for your so-called 'stability', thinking that is the golden ticket to progress and prosperity... this is what you will have to expect.

By the way, having a Minister/Ministry of Law should have never happened in the first place. To make matters worse, they've let one person take two portfolios: Law and Home Affairs. Definitely no conflicts of interest there... go back to sleep! :cool:
 

mudhatter

Alfrescian
Loyal
obvious who they are trying to fool

not going to work

this is why in democratic countries they have freedom of information or equivalent right

the idea that masses, no matter how stupid even stinkies, shouldn't know who has been granted permanent residency in their own countries is an absurd one
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If I have to guess: Tiongs, Viets, Japs, Koreans, ang mohs and CECAs. I've had these FTs show me their blue NRIC. :wink:
 

Untouchable

Alfrescian
Loyal
VUBJsXt.gif
 

bobby

Alfrescian
Loyal
Singapore does not publish breakdowns of its permanent resident population by nationality as doing so may have implications on specific groups of PRs and create bilateral sensitivities with their country of origin, said Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam on Monday (5 July).

How does black dog knows that it can "create bilateral sensitivities with their country of origin" ? Is this based on some findings or just his imagination ?

If the PR holders are indeed so ashamed of offending their country of origin...then the PR holders should have gracefully reject the PR status offered and be loyal to their country of origin or better still, stay put where they are.
 

Datingafter35

Alfrescian
Loyal
The fact that Singapore women are not lowering their standards to settle down and more than willing to let foreigners bait them, used and dumped. I don't have any statistics to back this opinion up. Only YouTube
 
Top