• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Is the Ocean not toxic enough

chuckyworld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Japan poison the Pacific ocean, with Fukushima leak, US want to add more Toxic to it, no wonder they are close and brubacking each other.


As long as it is not on their land they don't care,

US offers to destroy deadliest portion of Syria's chemical arms at sea.

WASHINGTON - Destroying Syria's deadliest chemical weapons on land would come with vexing diplomatic and security problems as well as environmental issues. To avoid those potential troubles, U.S. officials say, the Obama administration is exploring the use of a government-owned ship to carry out the disposal in international waters.

Under a plan yet to be approved, the chemicals would be transported to the MV Cape Ray in the Mediterranean Sea. The nearly 700-foot (213-meter) ship, based in Portsmouth, Viginia, and owned by the Transportation Department's Maritime Administration, would be outfitted with a special system to neutralize the chemical material. U.S. warships would provide an escort and security.

The decision to proceed with the chemical disposal plan at sea would be made by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, a global chemical weapons watchdog agency with 190 member states. In a statement Wednesday in the Netherlands, the watchdog agency said the effort to ship Syria's chemical arsenal out of the country "continues to pose challenges due to the security situation on the ground."

No country has committed to disposing of the chemical weapons on its own soil, which is why the U.S. offer to destroy the deadliest of the chemical components at sea is seen as a likely option. The U.S. officials who disclosed aspects of the U.S. portion of the plan spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk about it by name.

Jonathan Lalley, a spokesman for the president's National Security Council, stressed that no decision had been reached regarding destroying the chemical weapons outside of Syria.

"We and our international partners are pursuing alternative means of destruction, and we will continue discussing with other countries how they might best contribute to that effort," Lalley said in an emailed statement. "We remain confident that we will complete elimination of the program within the milestones agreed upon."

The Obama administration has turned to international waters when land-based actions proved problematic. The Navy buried al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden at sea to avoid his tomb becoming an attraction for extremists. The government has questioned terror suspects aboard Navy ships since the CIA closed its secret prisons overseas and President Barack Obama has refused to send more prisoners to the detention centre at the U.S. base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Under the plan being considered, a mobile Field Deployable Hydrolysis System using a titanium reactor and heated water and other chemicals would neutralize the chemical materials from Syria, making them unusable as weapons. The Defence Threat Reduction Agency, an arm of the Pentagon, developed the system but has never employed it in an actual operation.

According to several U.S. officials, two of the hydrolysis units would be mounted on the Cape Ray. It would take some time to retrofit the ship and conduct training to ensure that the process could be done successfully at sea.

Once the mission was finalized and the Cape Ray was ready, it would be transferred to control of the Defence Department's Military Sealift Command. It would have a civilian crew.

As of Wednesday, U.S. officials said they were still trying to determine how the chemical warfare materials would be moved from Syria to the U.S. ship. They said they expect that another country will provide a ship for that part of the task.

Officials said they expect a final decision soon and the operation would begin by the end of the year.

___

Associated Press writers Robert Burns and Deb Riechmann contributed to this report.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Spore also treats the sea as a dumping ground e.g they use to dispose old ammo, chemical weapons,... into the sea. I doubt things have changed because it's the cheapest method.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
easy way to destroy these things is to burn it in the sun.

Ask the Mat, they can do it at night when the sun is sleeping. By morning the sun rise it will be burnt.



Spore also treats the sea as a dumping ground e.g they use to dispose old ammo, chemical weapons,... into the sea. I doubt things have changed because it's the cheapest method.
 
Top